Background Adult cardiac surgery is often complicated by elevated blood losses that account for elevated transfusion requirements. Perioperative bleeding and transfusion of blood products are major risk factors for morbidity and mortality. Timely diagnostic and goal-directed therapies aim at the reduction of bleeding and need for allogeneic transfusions. Methods Single-centre, prospective, randomized trial assessing blood loss and transfusion requirements of 26 adult patients undergoing elective cardiac surgery at high risk for perioperative bleeding. Primary endpoint was blood loss at 24 h postoperatively. Random assignment to intra- and postoperative haemostatic management following either an algorithm based on conventional coagulation assays (conventional group: platelet count, aPTT, PT, fibrinogen) or based on point-of-care (PoC-group) monitoring, i.e. activated rotational thromboelastometry (ROTEM®) combined with multiple aggregometry (Multiplate®). Differences between groups were analysed using nonparametric tests for independent samples. Results The study was terminated after interim analysis ( n = 26). Chest tube drainage volume was 360 ml (IQR 229-599 ml) in the conventional group, and 380 ml (IQR 310-590 ml) in the PoC-group ( p = 0.767) after 24 h. Basic patient characteristics, results of PoC coagulation assays, and transfusion requirements of red blood cells and fresh frozen plasma did not differ between groups. Coagulation results were comparable. Platelets were transfused in the PoC group only. Conclusion Blood loss via chest tube drainage and transfusion amounts were not different comparing PoC- and central lab-driven transfusion algorithms in subjects that underwent high-risk cardiac surgery. Routine PoC coagulation diagnostics do not seem to be beneficial when actual blood loss is low. High risk procedures might not suffice as a sole risk factor for increased blood loss. Trial registration NCT01402739 , Date of registration July 26, 2011.

No abstract

Well-staged and realistic simulation is associated with better learning outcomes. It may be important to take gender aspects into account in ACRM training.

Zusammenfassung Adoptive T‑Zelltherapien sind neuartige Konzepte zur Behandlung verschiedener Krankheiten. CAR-T-Zellen sind dabei als Letztlinientherapie für fortgeschrittene B‑Zelllymphome und die B‑Zellleukämie etabliert und zugelassen. TCR-basierte T‑Zellen als Behandlungsoption verschiedener hämatologischer und solider Tumoren befinden sich in der klinischen Entwicklung. Genetisch modifizierte regulatorische T‑Zellen stehen dagegen noch am Anfang ihrer klinischen Entwicklung zur Induktion von Immuntoleranz in einer Vielzahl von Anwendungsgebieten. In diesem Artikel wird zunächst ein Überblick über die Funktion der regulatorischen T‑Zellen für die Induktion der Immuntoleranz sowie über ihre Rolle im Pathomechanismus bestimmter Immunerkrankungen gegeben und der aktuelle Stand der klinischen Entwicklungen von therapeutischen Ansätzen auf Basis genetisch modifizierter regulatorischer T‑Zellen zusammengefasst. Im Weiteren werden die regulatorisch-wissenschaftlichen Anforderungen und Herausforderungen hinsichtlich Herstellung und Qualitätskontrolle sowie nichtklinischer und klinischer Testung genetisch modifizierter regulatorischer T‑Zellen als Arzneimittel für neuartige Therapien diskutiert.

<p>We describe the animal species identification of meat using MALDI-TOF mass spectroscopy including the development and validation of a reliable method, qualified for use in the accredited official food-control laboratory.</p> <p>Previous publications had shown the potential of MALDI-TOF MS for animal species differentiation of several kind of food, including meat. Our aim was to establish a rapid and reliable method by means of a simplified sample preparation without prior tryptic digest, an existing popular MALDI system, an independent extensive reference database, and an adequate validation concept. In contrast to the previous works, we consequently use the MALDI user platform “MALDI-UP” to give other food control laboratories the possibility of exchanging reference and validation spectra.<br></p>