Konsumsi bubble tea kini menjadi sebuah tren di masyarakat khususnya usia remaja-dewasa. Di sisi lain, muncul UU Jaminan Produk Halal yang mewajibkan sertifikasi halal pada semua produk pangan yang beredar di Indonesia. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui adanya pengaruh kesadaran halal dan label halal terhadap keputusan pembelian produk bubble tea pada mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung. Populasi pada penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa Universitas Muhammadiyah Bandung. Jumlah sampel ditentukan menggunakan teknik Isaac & Michael sebanyak 325 responden. Pengumpulan data menggunakan kuesioner. Kuesioner telah diuji coba dan telah memenuhi syarat validitas dan reliabilitas. Pengujian hipotesis menggunakan regresi linear berganda. Hasil dari penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa variabel label halal dan kesadaran halal secara independent maupun simultan berpengaruh positif terhadap keputusan pembelian bubble tea. Mahasiswa UM Bandung sebagai mahasiswa dari universitas Islam memiliki kesadaran halal dengan membeli bubble tea yang telah memiliki label halal.
In Indonesia, determination of glycemic index (GI) was performed according to approved protocols prescribed by FAO (1998) and BPOM (2011); but, remarkable differences among these methods exist, primarily regarding the points of recommendation. This present work aimed to evaluate the technical steps of the protocol for determining GI between two protocols recommended by BPOM (2011) and FAO (1998). Ten healthy subjects (age 21-36 years old and body mass index (BMI) 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ) were recruited for the study. The blood glucose was measured with repeated glucose trials, while the number of sampling points for the blood glucose test was also investigated. The range of GI for rice, wheat cookies, NS-cookies, HMT-cookies were 68-77; 55-60; 35 -43; 35-41, respectively, using the combination of three different aspects between FAO and BPOM protocol. Noticeably, the difference in glucose trials did not cause significant variations to GI (n=10, p>0.05). Regarding statistical performance between methods, the Coefficient of Variance (CV) resulted from BPOM protocol (10 subjects, 5 sampling points) ranged 37 to 49%, being slightly higher compared to CV obtained from FAO protocol (7 subjects with triplicate glucose trials, 7 sampling points), i.e., 33% and 35%. The conclusive remark was noticed, that the most satisfying protocol for determination of GI was achieved using no less than two reference food trials, seven subjects, and seven blood sampling points.
The notion of the Glycemic Index (GI) can be utilized to aid in the choosing of foods for a healthy diet, leading to low GI claims that have been commonly found in various food products. The convenience of the test subject could affect GI results, such as the type of reference food and how much of it to be consumed. Therefore, the goals of this research were to see if white rice (Pandan Wangi) could be used as a reference food and to compare GI result obtained from a different portion of available carbohydrate. The recruited subjects ranged in age from 21-36 years old with BMI of 18.5-24.9 kg/m 2 ). Glucose measurement and sample testing (white rice and cookies) were conducted in the experiment. Overnight fasting was required of volunteers, and blood samples were obtained using One Touch Ultra Lifescan. There were seven points of blood sampling with triplication of glucose testing GI values were calculated with Incremental Area Under Curves (IAUC). The result means of GI were 74±16 (white rice), 60±24 (wheat cookies), 38±14 (NS-cookies), and 39±16 (HMT-cookies). The correlation between IAUC glucose and rice was significant with r=0. 834 (n=10, p<0,01). GI of white rice based on 25g available carbohydrates (AVCHO) was significantly different from GI based on 50g AVHCO (n=10, p<0.05). Pandan Wangi white rice can be used to substitute glucose or white bread in GI tests with a conversion factor of 0.74. It needed further study regarding the use of 25g AVCHO as the basic portion in GI test.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.