Measurement of environmental DNA (eDNA) is becoming a common technique to survey for rare and invasive fish due to its sensitivity and specificity. However, its utility is limited by an incomplete understanding of factors governing its sources and fates. Failure to detect eDNA is especially difficult to interpret so surveillance techniques often collect large numbers of samples across broad regions. If, however, fish could be reliably attracted to a single location where their eDNA could be easily measured that would be useful. We conducted a proof‐of‐concept study of this idea using invasive Common Carp. We monitored the distribution of radio‐tagged Carp and their eDNA across a 67 ha lake focusing at the bait site while a pheromone (Prostaglandin F2α; PGF
2α) was also measured to determine their reproductive condition. Prior to baiting, Carp were patchily distributed and while eDNA was occasionally detectable, it was patchy and only loosely associated with moderately dense groups of fish. Further, neither Carp, nor their eDNA were consistently measurable at the bait site and surrounding region, and the pheromone was not measurable at all. However, once baiting commenced, Carp started visiting the bait site and feeding, especially at night, where eDNA levels increased 500‐fold as fish densities doubled and PGF
2α became detectable. Fish presence, eDNA and pheromone concentrations peaked at night after 6 days, strongly suggesting feeding activity was the main driver. While the presence of eDNA precisely coincided with this aggregation, levels had dropped dramatically within 5 m. PGF
2α levels dropped less rapidly and demonstrated the presence of live mature fish. We suggest that food could be used to train fish to come to locations where they otherwise are too scarce to be reliably measured, increasing their eDNA release, making them measurable, and their reproductive condition also discernable by measuring pheromones.
The occurrence of musth, a period of elevated levels of androgens and heightened sexual activity, has been well documented for the male Asian elephant (Elephas maximus). However, the relationship between androgen-dependent musth and adrenocortical function in this species is unclear. The current study is the first assessment of testicular and adrenocortical function in free-ranging male Asian elephants by measuring levels of testosterone (androgen) and cortisol (glucocorticoid – a physiological indicator of stress) metabolites in faeces. During musth, males expectedly showed significant elevation in faecal testosterone metabolite levels. Interestingly, glucocorticoid metabolite concentrations remained unchanged between musth and non-musth periods. This observation is contrary to that observed with wild and captive African elephant bulls and captive Asian bull elephants. Our results show that musth may not necessarily represent a stressful condition in free-ranging male Asian elephants.
The epibranchial organ (EO) is an enigmatic tubular organ found in the pharyngeal cavity of many filter-feeding fishes. We investigated whether it might function as a taste organ that mediates aggregation and ingestion of planktonic food within the buccal cavity. The EO and associated structures of bighead and silver carps, two successful and invasive planktivorous fishes, were examined using histological and electrophysiological techniques. Both species possess finely structured gill rakers that extend directly via a series of protrusions into each of the four blind canals which are organized as the muscular EO, suggesting that the gill rakers and EO probably function in an integrated manner. Both the interior and exterior surfaces of the EOs of both species are covered with high densities of taste buds and solitary chemosensory cells (SCCs) as well as mucous cells. Conversely, taste buds are scarce in both the buccal cavities and external portions of the head and mouth of both species. Electrophysiological recordings from a caudal branch of the vagus nerve (cranial nerve X) found to innervate the EO showed it to be sensitive to chemicals found in a planktonic diet. L-Amino acids accounted for some, but not all of the neural activity. We conclude that taste buds and SCCs located on the EO and gill rakers probably serve to chemically detect food particles, which the EO then aggregates by mucus secretion before eventually expelling them onto the floor of the pharynx for ingestion. This specialized, pharyngeal chemosensory structure may explain the feeding success of these, and perhaps other planktivorous, filter-feeding fishes.
An increasing threat to U.S. waterways is the establishment and spread of invasive and injurious fishes. A species may be designated by the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) as federally "injurious" under the Lacey Act (18 U.S.C. 42) either if that species causes harm (injury) without establishing and spreading (not invasive), or if that species causes harm after establishment and spread (invasive). Species designated as injurious are prohibited from being imported, which is a highly effective way of preventing invasions by nonnative species. We developed a decision-support, riskassessment system to aid USFWS's prioritization of species for injuriousness. Our system is based on USFWS's evaluation criteria of a species' potential injuriousness and consists of a semi-quantitative, rapid-assessment procedure called the Ecological Risk Screening Summary (ERSS) and a quantitative probability network model called the Freshwater Fish Injurious Species Risk Assessment Model (FISRAM). ERSS provides information on a species' history of invasiveness elsewhere in the world, and on its biology and ecology, potential or known effects of introduction, global and domestic distribution, and climate associations, and provides conclusions on potential risk of invasiveness. FISRAM calculates expected probability of injuriousness as a function of species potential establishment, spread, and harm, based on probable effects on native species and ecosystems, suitability of climate and habitat in introduced areas, ease of dispersal and transport, and harm to humans. FISRAM is used to assess risk probability when ERSS categorizes invasion risk as uncertain. We calibrated and updated the probability structure of FISRAM using a data set of 50 species with known invasiveness outcomes. We demonstrate the use of these two models for risk assessment and decision-support in identifying and documenting species for potential risk management actions, such as listing wildlife as injurious under the Lacey Act.
Amazon sailfin catfish is relatively a recent invader to the open waters of India, and studies on ecological assessment of the species within the Indian freshwaters are lacking. In the present study, to assess the ecological impact of catfish, we established mesocosms mimicking the Indian freshwaters within natural ponds of eastern India using three species of native fish, rohu, catla and mrigal, and for two size classes, small (10-20 cm length) and large (20-30 cm length) native fishes. Mesocosms were maintained with (test) and without the catfish (control), and length and weight of native fish, zooplankton abundance, and several hydrological and soil parameters were measured at a monthly interval for a period of 120-days. The catfish had a significant (P<0.05) negative impact on growth of small-size rohu only. However, we found no significant (P>0.05) differences in abiotic parameters and zooplankton abundance between control and test ponds for the small-size class. We speculate that reduced growth of rohu could be due to competition from catfish in the context of feeding, and not due to modification of abiotic environment. Thus, we emphasize upon the need for behavioral studies to further assess the impact of the catfish.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.