Background: Failure to identify and correct malrotation of the first metatarsal may lead to recurrent hallux valgus deformity. We aimed to identify the proportion of hallux valgus patients with increased first metatarsal pronation using weightbearing computed tomography (WBCT) and to identify the relationship with conventional radiographic measurements. Methods: WBCT scans were analyzed for 102 feet with a hallux valgus angle (HVA) and intermetatarsal angle (IMA) greater than or equal to 16 and 9 degrees, respectively. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), alpha angle, sesamoid rotation angle (SRA), and sesamoid position were measured on standardized coronal WBCT slices. Pronation was recorded as positive. Hindfoot alignment angle (HAA) was assessed using dedicated software. Pearson correlation and multiple regression analyses were used to assess differences between groups. Results: Mean HVA was 29.8±9.4 degrees and mean IMA was 14.1±3.7 degrees. Mean MPA was 11.9±5.8 (range 0-26) degrees and mean alpha angle was 11.9±6.8 (range −3 to 29) degrees. In a previous study, we demonstrated the upper limit of normal MPA as 16 degrees and alpha angle as 18 degrees. Based on these criteria, we identified abnormal metatarsal pronation in 32 feet (31.4%). We found a strong positive correlation between SRA and HVA/IMA ( R = 0.67/0.60, respectively, P < .001). IMA and HAA weakly correlated with MPA and alpha angle (IMA: R = 0.26/0.27, respectively, P < .01; HAA: R = 0.26/0.27, respectively, P < .01). Regression analyses suggested that increasing IMA was the most significant radiographic predictor of increased pronation. In this cohort, there was no correlation between HVA or sesamoid position and MPA / alpha angle (HVA: P = .36/.12, respectively, sesamoid position, P = .86/.77, respectively). Conclusion: In this cohort of 102 feet that met plain radiographic criteria for hallux valgus deformity, first metatarsal pronation was found abnormal in 31.4% of patients. We found a weak association between the IMA and hindfoot valgus, but not the HVA.

We present the case of a 37-year-old man who presented with a penile lesion that engorged on erection. Ultrasound examination demonstrated vascularity of the lesion and the decision was made to perform a complete excision. Histological analysis confirmed the diagnosis of a pyogenic granuloma of the penis. Follow-up demonstrated no recurrence at 3 months.

Background Recurrence after surgical correction of hallux valgus may be related to coronal rotation of the first metatarsal. The scarf osteotomy is a commonly used procedure for correcting hallux valgus but has limited ability to correct rotation. Using weight-bearing computed tomography (WBCT), we aimed to measure the coronal rotation of the first metatarsal before and after a scarf osteotomy, and correlate these to clinical outcome scores. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 16 feet (15 patients) who had a WBCT before and after scarf osteotomy for hallux valgus correction. On both scans, hallux valgus angle (HVA), intermetatarsal angle (IMA), and anteroposterior/lateral talus-first metatarsal angle were measured using digitally reconstructed radiographs. Metatarsal pronation angle (MPA), alpha angle, sesamoid rotation angle, and sesamoid position were measured on standardized coronal WBCT slices. Preoperative and postoperative (12 mo) clinical outcome scores (Manchester Oxford Foot Questionnaire and Visual Analogue Scores) were captured. Results Mean HVA was 28.6 ± 10.1° preoperatively and 12.1 ± 7.7° postoperatively (P < .001). Mean IMA was 13.7 ± 3.8° preoperatively and 7.5 ± 3.0° postoperatively (P < .001). Before and after surgery, there were no significant differences in MPA (11.4 ± 7.7 and 11.4 ± 9.9°, respectively; P = .75) or alpha angle (10.9 ± 8.0 and 10.7 ± 13.1°, respectively; P = .83). There were significant improvements in sesamoid rotation angle (SRA) (26.4 ± 10.2 and 15.7 ± 10.2°, respectively; P = .03) and sesamoid position (1.4 ± 1.0 and 0.6 ± 0.6, respectively; P = .04) after a scarf osteotomy. There were significant improvements in all outcome scores after surgery. Poorer outcome scores correlated with greater postoperative MPA and alpha angles (r = .76 (P = .02) and .67 (P = .03), respectively). Conclusion A scarf osteotomy does not correct first metatarsal coronal rotation, and worse outcomes are linked to greater postoperative metatarsal rotation. Rotation of the metatarsal needs to be measured and considered when planning hallux valgus surgery. Further work was needed to compare postoperative outcomes with rotational osteotomies and modified Lapidus procedures when addressing rotation. Level of Evidence: 4

No abstract