DNA repair proteins participate in extensive proteinÀ protein interactions that promote the formation of DNA repair complexes. To understand how complex formation affects protein function during base excision repair, we used SpyCatcher/ SpyTag ligation to produce a covalent complex between human uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) and replication protein A (RPA). Our covalent "RPAÀ SpyÀ UNG2" complex could identify and excise uracil bases in duplex areas next to ssDNAÀ dsDNA junctions slightly faster than the wild-type proteins, but this was highly dependent on DNA structure, as the turnover of the RPAÀ SpyÀ UNG2 complex slowed at DNA junctions where RPA tightly engaged long ssDNA sections. Conversely, the enzymes preferred uracil sites in ssDNA where RPA strongly enhanced uracil excision by UNG2 regardless of ssDNA length. Finally, RPA was found to promote UNG2 excision of two uracil sites positioned across a ssDNAÀ dsDNA junction, and dissociation of UNG2 from RPA enhanced this process. Our approach of ligating together RPA and UNG2 to reveal how complex formation affects enzyme function could be applied to examine other assemblies of DNA repair proteins.

No abstract

Human uracil DNA glycosylase (UNG2) is responsible for removal of uracil bases from DNA and initiates base excision repair pathways. Accumulation of uracil or its fluorinated analogs in DNA is one of the killing mechanisms of thymidylate synthase (TS) inhibitors in cancer cells, and depletion of UNG2 often enhances the toxicity of these anticancer drugs. We used CRISPR to knockout UNG2 from HT29 colon cancer cells and confirmed the absence of protein by western blot and uracil excision assays. We tested the effect of UNG2 KO on the efficacy of multiple TS inhibitors (5‐fluorouracil, fluorodeoxyuridine, pemetrexed, and raltitrexed), and we determined that only fluorodeoxyuridine and raltitrexed were significantly more potent in UNG2 KO cells compared to wild‐type HT29 cells (fluorodeoxyuridine IC50: 2 mM (wt) vs. 3 nM (KO); raltitrexed IC50: 14 nM (wt) vs. 2 nM (KO)). Interestingly, UNG2 protein levels can also be depleted by the HDAC inhibitors SAHA and MS275, providing a pharmacologic strategy to reduce UNG2 activity in cells. Unexpectedly, the HDAC inhibitors synergized with 5‐fluorouracil, but not fluorodeoxyuridine, in both wild‐type and UNG2‐knockout cells. This suggested that HDAC inhibitors sensitized cells to 5‐fluorouracil through an UNG2‐independent mechanism. Moreover, cell death pathways activated by fluorodeoxyuridine and regulated by UNG2 activity are not sensitized by HDAC inhibitors. Our combined genetic and pharmacologic strategies targeting UNG2 activity in cells are defining cell death mechanisms for combination therapies of TS inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors. Future work will examine these drug combinations in additional cell lines to understand optimal therapeutic combinations and to further refine mechanisms of cell death.