Background: Numerous tools, including nutritional and inflammatory markers, have been evaluated as the predictors of poor outcomes in COVID-19 patients. This study aims to verify the predictive role of the prognostic nutritional index (PNI), CONUT Score, and inflammatory markers (monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet to lymphocyte ratio (PLR), systemic inflammatory index (SII), Systemic Inflammation Response Index (SIRI), and Aggregate Index of Systemic Inflammation (AISI)) in cases of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) and acute pulmonary embolism (APE) risk, as well as mortality, in COVID-19 patients. Methods: The present study was designed as an observational, analytical, retrospective cohort study, and included 899 patients over the age of 18 who had a COVID-19 infection, confirmed through real time-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), and were admitted to the County Emergency Clinical Hospital and Modular Intensive Care Unit of UMFST “George Emil Palade” of Targu Mures, Romania between January 2020 and March 20212. Results: Non-Surviving patients were associated with a higher incidence of chronic kidney disease (p = 0.01), cardiovascular disease (atrial fibrillation (AF) p = 0.01; myocardial infarction (MI) p = 0.02; peripheral arterial disease (PAD) p = 0.0003), malignancy (p = 0.0001), tobacco (p = 0.0001), obesity (p = 0.01), dyslipidemia (p = 0.004), and malnutrition (p < 0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that both nutritional and inflammatory markers had a high baseline value and were all independent predictors of adverse outcomes for all enrolled patients (for all p < 0.0001). The presence of PAD, malignancy, and tobacco, were also independent predictors of all outcomes. Conclusions: According to our findings, higher MLR, NLR, PLR, SII, SIRI, AISI, CONUT Score, and lower PNI values at admission strongly predict DVT risk, APE risk, and mortality in COVID-19 patients. Moreover, PAD, malignancy, and tobacco, all predicted all outcomes, while CKD predicts APE risk and mortality, but not the DVT risk.

No abstract

Stroke is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. In addition to the classical etiologies of stroke as atherosclerosis and cardioembolism there are many unusual, rare causes, which require a high level of clinical suspicion and further investigations for correct and early diagnosis and adequate treatment. Giant-cell arteritis or temporal arteritis, the most frequent vasculitis in the elderly population is one of the uncommon causes of stroke. In the setting of giant-cell arteritis, stroke more likely affects the vertebrobasilar territory and is the main cause of mortality. Duplex ultrasound examination is a routine investigation for stroke patients and may be key to the diagnosis if the classical hypoechoic ‘halo sign’ is recognized at the level of vertebral arteries. In this situation the ultrasound evaluation of temporal arteries and temporal artery biopsy are mandatory. The Giant-cell arteritis-related stroke is a rare condition; therefore, there are no evidence-based guidelines or standard recommendations for the treatment. In the present review, the main characteristics of giant-cell arteritis-related stroke are discussed.

Acute ischemic stroke treatment has been revolutionized by the addition of mechanical and aspiration thrombectomy. Randomized controlled trials have proven beyond doubt, the substantial clinical impact of endovascular interventions in anterior circulation territory strokes. Unfortunately, patients with vertebrobasilar ischemic stroke could not be included in these early trials due to inherent clinical, radiological, and prognostic particularities of posterior circulation ischemia; thus, indications for the treatment of posterior fossa strokes and basilar artery occlusion (BAO) are mainly based on retrospective studies and registries. BAO carries high morbidity and mortality, despite the new improvements in endovascular therapy. Identifying patients who will likely benefit from invasive treatment and have a good clinical outcome resides in discovering clinical, biological, or imaging markers, that have prognostic implications. Such imaging markers have been described, especially in the last decade.

BackgroundFenestrations or divisions of the vascular lumen into separate channels appear to be common anatomical variations in patients with intracranial aneurysms. The most frequent sites of occurrence are the anterior communicating artery (ACom), followed by vertebrobasilar and middle cerebral artery (MCA) locations.Case presentationA 61-year-old female was brought to the emergency department after experiencing severe headache with abrupt onset, nausea, and vomiting. Clinical examination on arrival showed a drowsy patient (GCS 14), with neck stiffness, but no cranial nerve palsies or other neurological deficits (Hunt-Hess 2). Non-contrast head CT and CT angiography revealed subarachnoid and intraventricular hemorrhage (modified Fisher 4) and two saccular aneurysms, one located on the right supraclinoid ICA with peripheral calcifications, measuring 20 × 12 mm, the second on the left MCA bifurcation, 6 × 4 mm. 3D rotational angiography revealed a right ICA fenestration located between the ophthalmic (OA) and posterior communicating artery (PCom). The proximal part of the fenestration harbored a large saccular aneurysm projecting superiorly with the neck engulfing the origin of the fenestration; due to the favorable neck and geometry of the aneurysm, endovascular coil occlusion was chosen as a treatment option without balloon or stent assistance. The decision was taken to clip the MCA aneurysm.ConclusionSupraclinoid ICA fenestrations are rare anatomical variations. Endovascular treatment of supraclinoid ICA fenestration-related aneurysms is feasible and safe, with the notable concern of perforators originating from the limbs.