The chemokine receptors CXCR4 and CCR5 have recently been shown to act as coreceptors, in concert with CD4, for human immunodeficiency virus-type 1 (HIV-1) infection. RANTES and other chemokines that interact with CCR5 and block infection of peripheral blood mononuclear cell cultures inhibit infection of primary macrophages inefficiently at best. If used to treat HIV-1-infected individuals, these chemokines could fail to influence HIV replication in nonlymphocyte compartments while promoting unwanted inflammatory side effects. A derivative of RANTES that was created by chemical modification of the amino terminus, aminooxypentane (AOP)-RANTES, did not induce chemotaxis and was a subnanomolar antagonist of CCR5 function in monocytes. It potently inhibited infection of diverse cell types (including macrophages and lymphocytes) by nonsyncytium-inducing, macrophage-tropic HIV-1 strains. Thus, activation of cells by chemokines is not a prerequisite for the inhibition of viral uptake and replication. Chemokine receptor antagonists like AOP-RANTES that achieve full receptor occupancy at nanomolar concentrations are strong candidates for the therapy of HIV-1-infected individuals.

CC chemokine receptor (CCR)4, a high affinity receptor for the CC chemokines thymus and activation-regulated chemokine (TARC) and macrophage-derived chemokine (MDC), is expressed in the thymus and spleen, and also by peripheral blood T cells, macrophages, platelets, and basophils. Recent studies have shown that CCR4 is the major chemokine receptor expressed by T helper type 2 (Th2) polarized cells. To study the in vivo role of CCR4, we have generated CCR4-deficient (CCR4−/−) mice by gene targeting. CCR4−/− mice developed normally. Splenocytes and thymocytes isolated from the CCR4−/− mice failed to respond to the CCR4 ligands TARC and MDC, as expected, but also surprisingly did not undergo chemotaxis in vitro in response to macrophage inflammatory protein (MIP)-1α. The CCR4 deletion had no effect on Th2 differentiation in vitro or in a Th2-dependent model of allergic airway inflammation. However, CCR4−/− mice exhibited significantly decreased mortality on administration of high or low dose bacterial lipopolysaccharide (LPS) compared with CCR4+/+ mice. After high dose LPS treatment, serum levels of tumor necrosis factor α, interleukin 1β, and MIP-1α were reduced in CCR4−/− mice, and decreased expression of MDC and MIP-2 mRNA was detected in peritoneal exudate cells. Analysis of peritoneal lavage cells from CCR4−/− mice by flow cytometry also revealed a significant decrease in the F4/80+ cell population. This may reflect a defect in the ability of the CCR4−/− macrophages to be retained in the peritoneal cavity. Taken together, our data reveal an unexpected role for CCR4 in the inflammatory response leading to LPS-induced lethality.

Modification of the amino terminus of regulated on activated normal T-cell expressed (RANTES) has beenshown to have a significant effect on biological activity and produces proteins with antagonist properties. Two amino-terminally modified RANTES proteins, Met-RAN-TES and aminooxypentane-RANTES (AOP-RANTES), exhibit differential inhibitory properties on both monocyte and eosinophil chemotaxis. We have investigated their binding properties as well as their ability to activate the RANTES receptors CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5 in cell lines overexpressing these receptors. We show that Met-RANTES has weak activity in eliciting a calcium response in Chinese hamster ovary cells expressing CCR1, CCR3, and CCR5, whereas AOP-RANTES has full agonist activity on CCR5 but is less effective on CCR3 and CCR1. Their ability to induce chemotaxis of the murine pre-B lymphoma cell line, L1.2, transfected with the same receptors, consolidates these results. Monocytes have detectable mRNA for CCR1, CCR2, CCR3, CCR4, and CCR5, and they respond to the ligands for these receptors in chemotaxis but not always in calcium mobilization. AOP-RANTES does not induce calcium mobilization in circulating monocytes but is able to do so as these cells acquire the macrophage phenotype, which coincides with a concomitant up-regulation of CCR5. We have also tested the ability of both modified proteins to induce chemotaxis of freshly isolated monocytes and eosinophils. Cells from most donors do not respond, but occasionally cells from a particular donor do respond, particularly to AOP-RANTES. We therefore hypothesize that the occasional activity of AOP-RAN-TES to induce leukocyte chemotaxis is due to donor to donor variation of receptor expression.The chemokine family is responsible for the trafficking of leukocytes to maintain a correctly functioning immune system (1-3). Members of both the ␣-and ␤-subclasses of chemokines may be expressed constitutively and have been shown to be responsible for leukocyte homing, whereas many others are inducible and have been shown to be up-regulated in inflammatory conditions, both in human disease as well as animal models of inflammation. Inflammatory chemokines include members of the MCP 1 and MIP families, as well as the closely related proteins, RANTES and eotaxin. Chemokines mediate their biological effects through seven transmembrane-spanning, G-protein-coupled receptors, which also serve as the coreceptor with CD4 for HIV-1 infection. Cellular migration is a consequence of several signaling events, and many intracellular changes such as actin polymerization, shape change, and receptor polarization are implicated (4). Many investigations have shown the importance of the aminoterminal region of the chemokine proteins for receptor activation via G-protein-coupled signal transduction. Several members of the CXC family have a three-residue motif, ELR (GluLeu-Arg), preceding the first two cysteines that is essential for receptor binding and for neutrophil chemotactic activity. Truncation of the first 5 residues, so that ...