The overall redox potential of a cell is primarily determined by oxidizable/reducible chemical pairs, including glutathione–glutathione disulfide, reduced thioredoxin–oxidized thioredoxin, and NAD+–NADH (and NADP–NADPH). Current methods for evaluating oxidative stress rely on detecting levels of individual byproducts of oxidative damage or by determining the total levels or activity of individual antioxidant enzymes. Oxidation–reduction potential (ORP), on the other hand, is an integrated, comprehensive measure of the balance between total (known and unknown) pro-oxidant and antioxidant components in a biological system. Much emphasis has been placed on the role of oxidative stress in chronic diseases, such as Alzheimer's disease and atherosclerosis. The role of oxidative stress in acute diseases often seen in the emergency room and intensive care unit is considerable. New tools for the rapid, inexpensive measurement of both redox potential and total redox capacity should aid in introducing a new body of literature on the role of oxidative stress in acute illness and how to screen and monitor for potentially beneficial pharmacologic agents.

When debridement of the wound bed is not sufficient to reduce bacterial loads, the application of broad-spectrum antiseptics maybe indicated. Our data would suggest that H2O2 and iodine are poor choices, potentially retarding the contribution of fibroblasts to the healing process. Silver sulfadiazine and chlorhexidine, at levels still proven to be bactericidal, had fewer detrimental effects on fibroblast activity in these assays. The silver-containing antiseptics may even increase the proliferative potential of these cells in culture.