We investigated clinical and neuropathologic heterogeneity and apolipoprotein E (apoE) genotype in 11 cases of neuropathologically diagnosed corticobasal degeneration (CBD). Although seven of the 11 patients presented with unilateral limb dysfunction, the remaining four patients had less typical presentations including memory loss, behavioral changes, and difficulties with speech or gait. All 11 patients eventually developed extrapyramidal signs as well as cortical features, most commonly apraxia. At autopsy, the brains of seven of the 11 patients exhibited predominant neuronal loss and gliosis of perirolandic cortex; degeneration of more rostral frontal cortex was observed in three of the four patients with atypical clinical presentations. All cases displayed ballooned neurons, tau-positive neuronal and glial inclusions, threads and grains, and nigral degeneration. Six of the 11 cases manifested overlapping neuropathologic features of one or more disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), Parkinson's disease (PD), and hippocampal sclerosis. Interestingly, these six patients all exhibited memory loss early in the course of their illness. The 11 CBD cases exhibited increased frequency (0.32) of the epsilon 4 allele of apoE, relative to control populations; the frequency remained elevated (0.25) even when the three cases with concomitant AD were excluded. Beta-amyloid (A beta) deposition in hippocampus or cortex was present in five of the seven cases with an epsilon 4 genotype. These observations indicate that CBD is a pathologically and clinically heterogeneous disorder with substantial overlap with other neurodegenerative disorders.

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: The North American Spine Society's (NASS) Evidence Based Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Low Back Pain features evidence-based recommendations for diagnosing and treating adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. The guideline is intended to reflect contemporary treatment concepts for nonspecific low back pain as reflected in the highest quality clinical literature available on this subject as of February 2016. PURPOSE: The purpose of the guideline is to provide an evidence-based educational tool to assist spine specialists when making clinical decisions for adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. This article provides a brief summary of the evidence-based guideline recommendations for diagnosing and treating patients with this condition. STUDY DESIGN: This is a guideline summary review. METHODS: This guideline is the product of the Low Back Pain Work Group of NASS' Evidence-Based Clinical Guideline Development Committee. The methods used to develop this guideline are detailed in the complete guideline and technical report available on the NASS website. In brief, a multidisciplinary work group of spine care specialists convened to identify clinical questions to address in the guideline. The literature search strategy was developed in consultation with medical librarians. Upon completion of the systematic literature search, evidence relevant to the clinical questions posed in the guideline was reviewed. Work group members utilized NASS evidentiary table templates to summarize study conclusions, identify study strengths and weaknesses, and assign levels of evidence. Work group members participated in webcasts and in-person rate expert opinion when necessary. The draft guideline was submitted to an internal and external peer review process and ultimately approved by the NASS Board of Directors. RESULTS: Eighty-two clinical questions were addressed, and the answers are summarized in this article. The respective recommendations were graded according to the levels of evidence of the supporting literature. CONCLUSIONS: The evidence-based clinical guideline has been created using techniques of evidence-based medicine and best available evidence to aid practitioners in the diagnosis and treatment of adult patients with nonspecific low back pain. The entire guideline document, including the evidentiary tables, literature search parameters, literature attrition flowchart, suggestions for future research, and all of the references,

Based on the results of preclinical models, magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) has gained attention as a putative neuroprotective agent. The negative results of a large-scale, randomized clinical trial using MgSO4 in acute stroke have tempered the initial enthusiasm for a neuroprotective benefit of the ion. Additional, large-scale clinical trials in stroke and other forms of brain injury are underway. This article reviews the central nervous system (CNS) physiology of Mg++, disordered Mg++ homeostasis in acute brain injury, preclinical and preliminary clinical foundations of current clinical trials, and the data regarding the CNS bio-availability of MgSO4 an important requisite for neuroprotective therapy. Although human studies have confirmed that moderate hypermagnesemia is well-tolerated and feasible, only modest elevation of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) [Mg++] occurs. This modest increment of CSF [Mg++] in brain-injured humans occurs in the range of 10 to 19%. However, experimental evidence has yet to establish whether this modest elevation is sufficient for neuroprotection. Because of the limited CNS passage of the ion, further experimental work is needed to define the neuroprotective threshold of [Mg++] in the injured brain.

No abstract

Neuropathic pain (NP), caused by a primary lesion or dysfunction in the nervous system, affects approximately 4 million people in the United States each year. It is associated with many diseases, including diabetic peripheral neuropathy, postherpetic neuralgia, human immunodeficiency virus-related disorders, and chronic radiculopathy. Major pathophysiological mechanisms include peripheral sensitization, sympathetic activation, disinhibition, and central sensitization. Unlike most acute pain conditions, NP is extremely difficult to treat successfully with conventional analgesics. This article introduces a contemporary management approach, that is, one that incorporates nonpharmacological, pharmacological, and interventional strategies. Some nonpharmacological management strategies include patient education, physical rehabilitation, psychological techniques, and complementary medicine. Pharmacological strategies include the use of first-line agents that have been supported by randomized controlled trials. Finally, referral to a pain specialist may be indicated for additional assessment, interventional techniques, and rehabilitation. Integrating a comprehensive approach to NP gives the primary care physician and patient the greatest chance for success.

In this study population, when MS-sNT was taken as directed for chronic, moderate to severe pain for up to 12 months, most AEs were typical opioid-related side effects. Mean COWS scores remained low, indicating lack of withdrawal symptoms and appropriate transition off the study drug at completion.

Hypermagnesemia produced only marginal increases in total and ionized cerebrospinal fluid [Mg]. Regulation of cerebrospinal fluid [Mg] is largely maintained following acute brain injury and limits the brain bioavailability of MgSO4.

CRPS = complex regional pain syndrome; RSD = reflex sympathetic dystrophy C omplex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy (RSD), is a regional, posttraumatic, neuropathic pain problem that most often affects 1 or more limbs. Weir Mitchell identified a pattern of clinical signs and symptoms in Civil War casualties and first described CRPS in the 1860s. He used the term causalgia to describe the key feature of burning pain after penetrating limb injuries. The ensuing severe chronic pain was noted to be more prevalent when the limb injury involved a major peripheral nerve.The nosology and terminology of posttraumatic limb pain have undergone a series of changes that have led to considerable confusion and controversy regarding the diagnosis and treatment of CRPS. Historically, CRPS has been known as RSD, posttraumatic dystrophy, causalgia, minor causalgia, Sudek atrophy, and shoulder-hand syndrome. The most popular contemporary label is RSD, and this terminology is based on the notion that a pathologic sympathetically maintained reflex arc is involved in the generation and perpetuation of pain. This theory was strengthened by anecdotal reports of pain relief after local anesthetic or pharmacological sympathetic ganglion blockade. Recent studies have shown that the sympathetic nervous system is Complex regional pain syndrome (CRPS), formerly known as reflex sympathetic dystrophy, is a regional, posttraumatic, neuropathic pain problem that most often affects 1 or more limbs. Like most medical conditions, early diagnosis and treatment increase the likelihood of a successful outcome. Accordingly, patients with clinical signs and symptoms of CRPS after an injury should be referred immediately to a physician with expertise in evaluating and treating this condition. Physical therapy is the cornerstone and first-line treatment for CRPS. Mild cases respond to physical therapy and physical modalities. Mild to moderate cases may require adjuvant analgesics, such as anticonvulsants and/or antidepressants. An opioid should be added to the treatment regimen if these medications do not provide sufficient analgesia to allow the patient to participate in physical therapy. Patients with moderate to severe pain and/or sympathetic dysfunction require regional anesthetic blockade to participate in physical therapy. A small percentage of patients develop refractory, chronic pain and require long-term multidisciplinary treatment, including physical therapy, psychological support, and pain-relieving measures. Pain-relieving measures include medications, sympathetic/somatic blockade, spinal cord stimulation, and spinal analgesia.