Purpose Bone-patellar-tendon-bone (BPTB) autografting fixed with metal interference screws (IS) is the gold standard for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Advances in surgical technology provide a wide choice of grafts, fixation devices and surgical approaches. Methods Two-hundred and sixty-one orthopedic surgeons of ten subspecialties from 57 countries were surveyed on their choice of graft and fixation device, the number of reconstructed bundles, and arthroscopic portal. Their preferences were analyzed according to country of origin, field of expertise and seniority, and compared to current publications. Results Hamstring autografting was the most popular choice (63 %), then BPTB (26 %) and allograft (11 %). The anteromedial portal was preferred over the traditional transtibial portal (68 % versus 31 %). Two-thirds reported routinely performing a single-bundle graft reconstruction, compared to one-third who used the double-bundle technique. The Endo-button was the most common graft fixation method (40 %), followed by the bioabsorbable IS (34 %), metallic IS (12 %), rigidfix (10 %) and others (4 %). The preferences of hamstring tendon grafting and the anteromedial portal are not supported in the literature. Responses from North American and European surgeons were different from all the others.Conclusions Surgeon preferences in ACL reconstruction differ considerably worldwide. Common practice is not always supported by evidence-based publications.

The most common surgical approaches in use in hip arthroplasty are posterior and lateral. Anterior approach is used by a minority of orthopedic surgeons for that purpose. Cementing hip prosthesis is falling out of favor among orthopedic surgeons worldwide. The trend toward un-cemented hip arthroplasty is not well supported in the current literature.

The rate of complication is higher in multisegmental resections and when double combined approach is performed. Reoperations display greater morbidity owing to dissection through scar/fibrosis from previous operations and possibly from RT. Careful treatment planning and, in the event of uncertainty, referral to a specialty center must be stressed. The high risk of complications should not discourage surgeons from performing en bloc resection when needed. Most of the patients who sustain complications benefit from the better local control resulting from en bloc resection.

No abstract