Aims: Previous comparisons between AMPLATZER septal occluders and other designs were retrospective, non-randomised, non-concurrent and involved fewer patients. A prospective concurrent head-to-head comparison of AMPLATZER (ASO), Cera (CSO) and Figulla (FSO) septal occluders was planned to study the patient outcomes.Methods and results: The three occluders were serially allocated in a cycle of three to consecutively included patients. Demographic, procedural details and complications were analysed. After calculating a sample size of 122 patients in each group, additional patients were recruited to ensure at least 80% follow-up. Four hundred and fifty (450) consecutive patients equally divided among the three designs were comparable in all parameters. There were no major complications and procedural success was 99.6%. The defects and device sizes were similar in all groups; the delivery system was significantly smaller with the ASO. The FSO needed special deployment techniques less often and formed a cobra deformity more often, though this was not statistically significant. Patient outcome was similar among the groups at a follow-up of 12-47 months.
Conclusions:The new occluders are comparable to the ASO with good outcomes and low complication rates in the current era. The new modified structural designs do not show any advantages in terms of procedural complications on early and midterm follow-up, but long-term studies are warranted.
ObjectivesNarrowed right ventricular (RV) outflow conduits and pulmonary arteries (PA) increase RV pressures and warrant interventions. Stent angioplasty is an alternative to more morbid redo-surgery in developing countries. We evaluate the efficacy and safety of stenting and assess need for redo-surgical reinterventions on midterm follow-up after stent angioplasty.MethodsPatients who underwent conduit, main PA and bilateral branch PA stenting for elevated RV pressures were analyzed retrospectively. Success was defined as 20% reduction in RV pressures or RV-aortic pressure ratio; 50% reduction in gradients or 50% increase of luminal diameter. Procedural results, complications and need for redo surgeries on follow-up were assessed.ResultsAmong 60 patients aged 1–46 years, 57 were post-operative patients, who needed stenting at a median period of 48 months after surgery. Stenting succeeded in 98% and reduced RV pressures from 105.42 ± 28.39 mmHg to 54.46 ± 16.89 mmHg. Direct major procedural complications in five (8%) patients included procedural failure in one, stent migration in three and lung hemorrhage in one. None of the stented conduits needed a surgical change on a follow-up ranging 3–120 months. Following bilateral PA stenting in twenty-four patients, only two needed a repeat open-heart surgery during follow-up ranging 3–108 months. Catheter reinterventions on follow-up included elective percutaneous pulmonary valve implantation in nine patients and stent redilation in seven patients.ConclusionsStent angioplasty was safe and effective. Surgery was postponed in all stenosed conduits. Elective redilation of stents after bilateral PA stenting may be needed for somatic growth; but open-heart repeat surgeries can be avoided in a majority.
When the inferior caval vein is occluded or abnormal, jugular and hepatic veins provide alternative routes for interventions. For pulmonary artery stenting, transhepatic access may give a relatively straighter route than that from the jugular veins. We describe the challenges and strategies during transhepatic bilateral pulmonary artery stenting after arterial switch operation complicated by occluded inferior caval vein and congested hepatic veins.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.