While sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) has virtually replaced axillary dissection as the initial diagnostic procedure for invasive breast cancer, the role of SLNB in ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with SLNB in DCIS. All patients with DCIS or DCIS with microinvasion (DCISM) who underwent SLNB from June 1997 to April 2002 at the University of Florida were included for analysis. The indications for SLNB were at the discretion of the treating surgeon. Lymphatic mapping involved a sequential dermal-peritumoral radiocolloid injection and dynamic lymphoscintigraphy followed by an intraoperative assessment of radioactivity with a handheld gamma probe. All sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) with radioactive counts>or=10% of the ex vivo counts of the most radioactive SLN were removed. Pathologic analysis consisted of slicing the SLN at 2 mm intervals for permanent section. All paraffin blocks of the SLNs were step sectioned in 4 microm sections (92 microm spacing) through the entire lymph node. Slides were then stained with an immunohistochemical stain for cytokeratin (AE1/AE3) and evaluated by microscopy. Nodal metastases were classified using the 6th edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging manual. From April 1998 to April 2002, 43 patients with DCIS underwent SLNB at the University of Florida. Seven patients (16%) with multifocal or extensive DCIS (five patients) or DCISM (two patients) who underwent SLNB had a positive sentinel node. Two of the three patients considered positive by immunohistochemistry alone had either DCISM or invasive disease. Four (80%) of the five patients with extensive DCIS and a positive sentinel node were ultimately determined to have invasive or microinvasive disease. While SLNB remains controversial in DCIS, our data suggest that patients with extensive DCIS should undergo SLNB at the initial procedure to avoid the need for a second operation. Data from clinical trials are needed to determine the impact of SLNB results on overall survival in patients with DCIS.

Systemic therapy alone for metastatic melanoma is relatively ineffective, and surgical resection of metastases to a solitary site remains the best single treatment to improve survival. While cytoreductive surgery plus chemotherapy play a significant role in the management of advanced ovarian cancer, the precise role of surgery as an adjunct to systemic therapy for melanoma metastatic to multiple sites is not well defined. We report a patient with ocular melanoma metastatic to liver and pancreas treated by cytoreductive surgery consisting of mesohepatic resection, distal pancreatectomy, and portal node dissection, followed by biochemotherapy with dacarbazine and interferon alpha. The concept of cytoreductive surgery is reviewed, with particular attention to its use in the management of metastatic melanoma. The patient's postoperative course was unremarkable and she remains alive and asymptomatic with no detectable disease at 20 months' follow-up. Cytoreductive surgery as a part of an aggressive multidisciplinary approach may play a role in the treatment of cutaneous and ocular melanoma metastatic to multiple visceral sites. Data from well-designed, innovative clinical trials of cytoreductive surgery and biochemotherapy are required to determine the effectiveness of this multidisciplinary approach.

No abstract