No abstract

Objective We analyzed malfunction rates (obstruction, omental wrapping, displacement) and catheter survival for self-locating catheters as compared with other Tenckhoff catheter designs. Patients and Methods We conducted our survey at two centers, prospectively studying all self-locating catheters implanted from May 1997 to October 2000 and used for peritoneal dialysis (PD). Tenckhoff catheters of other designs used previously in our units were used as the control group. We analyzed removal causes and catheter survival. Results We studied 173 catheters (105 self-locating catheters, 53 straight catheters, and 15 coiled catheters) implanted in 139 patients (43% of them women) with a mean age of 53 ± 14 years. The analysis of catheter removal showed that 3 of 105 self-locating catheters, 3 of 15 coiled catheters, and 17 of 53 straight catheters were removed owing to malfunction (c 2: p = 0.0000). Kaplan–Meier curves showed that the bulk of removals for malfunction occurred within the first 3 months after PD start. The group of self-locating catheters showed better survival (log-rank: p = 0.0009). Other causes for catheter removal included peritonitis ( n = 22), exit-site infection alone ( n = 4), and end of PD treatment ( n = 66). No significant differences were seen in the annual peritonitis rate (straight-tip: 0.955 ± 2.315 episodes annually; coiled-tip: 0.651 ± 0.864 episodes annually; self-locating: 0.720 ± 1.417 episodes annually; t-test: p > 0.400). No gut or bladder perforations were observed. Conclusion In our survey, self-locating catheters were associated with better survival and fewer removals for malfunction than were Tenckhoff catheters of other designs.

No abstract

No abstract

Random variability of blood pressure complicates the diagnosis and subsequent treatment of hypertension. To evaluate the importance of the number of blood pressure measurements in the correct diagnosis and control of hypertension, the authors used a Bayesian model to estimate the true average blood pressure of a group of newly diagnosed hypertensives, then calculated the diagnostic error that would result from monitoring methods using 24 daytime measurements or from using only three random monitoring measurements. The study population consisted of 129 individuals with newly diagnosed mild hypertension according to standard criteria, who were also evaluated with an ambulatory blood pressure monitor. In true normotensives (daytime diastolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg), the negative predictive value with three measurements was 0.92, and it rose to 0.96 with monitoring methods. In mild hypertensives (90-104 mm Hg), the positive predictive value was 0.64 with three measurements and 0.84 with monitoring methods, thus reducing the rate of false mild hypertensives from 35% to 15%. Finally, in patients with moderate or severe hypertension (>104 mm Hg), the positive predictive value improved from 0.26 with three readings to 0.61 with monitoring methods. Similar results were observed with daytime systolic pressure measurements. As the number of measurements increased, the diagnostic error due to the random variability of blood pressure became progressively smaller. In cases of hypertension, the large improvement in predictive values may justify using monitoring methods to confirm standard diagnosis.