OBJECTIVEThe use of colonoscopy as a primary screening test for colorectal cancer (CRC) in average risk adults is a subject of controversy. Our primary objective was to build a predictive model based on a few simple variables that could be used as a guide for identifying average risk adults more suitable for examination with colonoscopy as a primary screening test. METHODSThe prevalence of advanced adenomas was assessed by primary screening colonoscopy in 2210 consecutive adults at least 40 yr old, without known risk factors for CRC. Age, gender, and clinical and biochemical data were compared among people without adenomas, those with nonadvanced adenomas, and those with any advanced neoplasm. A combined score to assess the risk of advanced adenomas was built with the variables selected by multiple logistic regression analysis. RESULTSNeoplastic lesions were found in 617 subjects (27.9%), including 259 with at least one neoplasm that was 10 mm or larger, villous, or with moderate-to-severe dysplasia, and 11 with invasive cancers. Advanced lesions were more frequent among men, older people, and those with a higher body mass index (BMI). These three variables were independent predictors of advanced adenomas in multivariate analysis. A score combining age, sex, and BMI was developed as a guide for identifying individuals more suitable for screening colonoscopy. CONCLUSIONSAge, gender, and BMI can be used to build a simple score to select those average risk adults who might be candidates for primary screening colonoscopy.Reprint requests and correspondence: Maria Teresa Betés Ibáñez, M.D. Departamento de Digestivo, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra 31080 Pamplona, Spain. INTRODUCTIONColorectal cancer (CRC) is the second most frequent cause of cancer-related death in western countries (1). Most cancers develop from benign adenomatous polyps (2, 3), in subjects with no known risk factors for the disease (4). Although it is not yet possible to determine which adenomas will progress to cancer, certain pathological features have been found to correlate with the risk of progressing to CRC (3, 5). "Advanced adenomas" have been defined as those with at least one of the following characteristics: size 1 cm or larger, tubulovillous or villous histology, and moderate or severe dysplasia (6-9).Screening with full colonoscopy as a primary procedure has been limited to a few small series (10-16), and results have not been focused in advanced adenomas. Two large colonoscopic series recently published (17,18) have assessed the proportion of advanced proximal adenomas in average risk adults. Although the prevalence of colonic adenomas is higher among men than among women (5,12,19,20) and increases with age (11,13,15), more data are needed to adequately assess the independent role of the most relevant predictors of advanced adenomas (18). A variety of factors have been linked to the development of adenomas or CRC (21-25), but currently there is no dominant risk factor that could be practically used for risk stratification in screening...

BACKGROUNDRadioembolization is a new tool for the treatment of hepatic tumors that consists in the injection of biocompatible microspheres carrying radioisotopes into the hepatic artery or its branches. METHODSWe have performed radioembolization in 78 patients with hepatic tumors using resinbased microspheres loaded with yttrium-90. All patients were previously evaluated to minimize the risk of hazardous irradiation to nontarget organs and to obtain the data needed for dose calculation. RESULTSWe report a complication found in three cases (3.8%) that consists of abdominal pain resulting from gastroduodenal lesions and that had a chronic, insidious course. Microscopically, microspheres were detected in the specimens obtained from all affected gastric areas. Since these gastroduodenal lesions do not appear when nonradiating microspheres are injected in animals, lesions are likely to be due to radiation and not to an ischemic effect of vascular occlusion by spheres. CONCLUSIONSWe believe that a pretreatment evaluation that includes a more thorough scrutiny of the hepatic vascularization in search of small collaterals connecting to the gastroduodenal tract can help prevent this awkward complication.

BACKGROUNDFor colorectal cancer screening, the predictive value of distal findings in the ascertainment of proximal lesions is not fully established. The aims of this study were to assess distal findings as predictors of advanced proximal neoplasia and to compare the predictive value of endoscopy alone vs. combined endoscopic and histopathologic data. METHODSPrimary colonoscopy screening was performed in 2210 consecutive, average-risk adults. Age, gender, endoscopic (size, number of polyps), and histopathologic distal findings were used as potential predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms (i.e., any adenoma ≥1 cm in size, and/or with villous histology, and/or with severe dysplasia or invasive cancer). Polyps were defined as distal if located in the descending colon, the sigmoid colon, or the rectum. Those in other locations were designated proximal. RESULTSNeoplastic lesions, including 11 invasive cancers, were found in 617 (27.9%) patients. Advanced proximal neoplasms without any distal adenoma were present in 1.3% of patients. Of the advanced proximal lesions, 39% were not associated with any distal polyp. Older age, male gender, and distal adenoma were independent predictors of advanced proximal neoplasms. The predictive ability of a model with endoscopic data alone did not improve after inclusion of histopathologic data. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the predictive ability of models that use age, gender, and any combination of distal findings was relatively low. The proportion of advanced proximal neoplasms identified if any distal polyp was an indication for colonoscopy was only 62%. CONCLUSIONSA strategy in which colonoscopy is performed solely in patients with distal colonic findings is not effective screening for the detection of advanced proximal neoplasms in an average-risk population.Reprint requests: Maite Betés Ibáñez, MD, PhD, Departamento de Digestivo, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, 31080 Pamplona, Spain. INTRODUCTIONMost colorectal cancers (CRC) develop from adenomas, 1-3 which have a long, asymptomatic phase during which they are detectable and curable. Excision of colorectal adenomas reduces the incidence and the mortality of CRC. 2,4-11 Therefore, CRC fulfills the criteria for benefit from screening. 12 In 1996, the United States Preventive Services Task Force recommended screening of asymptomatic adults over 50 years of age with either flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) or fecal occult blood tests (FOBT). 13 These recommendations now are endorsed by the American Cancer Society, 14 the World Health Organization, 15 and by virtually all medical and surgical professional societies concerned with digestive diseases. 16,17 A positive FS or FOBT result is an indication for colonoscopy. The continuing high mortality rates for patients with CRC, together with two large studies that demonstrate that FS fails to identify a substantial proportion of proximal lesions, 18,19 have led many specialists to regard reliance on FS or FOBT alone as screening tests would be as wrong as mammography o...

No abstract