Poly 96L/4D-lactide copolymer bioabsorable implants seem to be safe and effective for the management of unstable juvenile OCD lesions of the knee. They offer stability for the healing OCD lesions, with minimal reaction from degradation products.

Background: Despite improving diagnostic and surgical techniques, some patients do not respond as well as others following hip arthroscopy. In most musculoskeletal studies, predictors for surgical outcomes focus solely on physical health prior to surgery. However, there likely exists a relationship between a patient’s mental health and their postoperative patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Methods: 40 patients who met indications for hip arthroscopy were enrolled in this prospective cohort study. All patients completed a baseline Brief Resilience Scale (BRS) and 4validated PROMs: modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), visual analogue scale for pain (VAS), Hip Outcomes Score for Activities of Daily Living (HOS-Daily), and Hip Outcomes Score for Sports-Related Activities (HOS-Sport). For a secondary measure of psychometric evaluation, past medical histories of anxiety/depression were recorded. Patients were stratified into Low Resilience (LR < 21), Normal Resilience (NR 22-24), and High Resilience (HR > 25) by tertile to determine differences in PROMs. Comparisons and correlations of pre- and postoperative outcomes between resilience groups were performed. Results: In comparing the LR and HR groups, there was a significant relationship between resilience and all PROMs both preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively ( p < 0.05), with the exception of the HOS-Sports. Pearson Correlation Coefficients confirmed this trend in the mHHS and the HOS-Daily. Additionally, there were sixteen patients who were discharged prior to 6-month follow-up with an average resilience above the mean of total population ( p < 0.0001). Resilience was associated with return to activity ( p = 0.017). A past history of anxiety/depression was associated with lower resilience ( p = 0.039). Conclusions: This study showed that HR hip arthroscopy patients had better PROMs than LR patients both preoperatively and postoperatively. HR patients were able to return to activity earlier and had lower rates of preoperative anxiety/depression. The BRS is a simple in-office screening tool, which may help guide patient and doctor communication and expectations.

Gluteus medius (GM) tears are recognized as a significant cause of lateral hip pain. While non-operative management can be effective, those who fail this treatment modality may be indicated for operative intervention. There is no widely agreed upon ‘gold standard’ technique with regards to open, mini-open and endoscopic repair. Our study prospectively enrolled 31 patients undergoing the authors preferred ‘mini-open’ repair technique with patients completing pre- and post-operative patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Modified Harris Hip Score, Visual Analogue pain Scale, Hip Outcomes Score for Activities of Daily Living and Hip Outcomes Score for Sports-Related Activities (HOS-SSS). The effect of anxiety/depression on outcomes was also examined. Patients had an average follow-up of 6 months. There was a statistically significant increase in all PROMs in the 31 patients undergoing mini-open repair. A sub-group of patients with self-reported history of anxiety/depression via patient intake paperwork experienced less improvement than those without, however this cohort still had significant improvement in all categories except HOS-SSS. Our study shows that a mini-open GM repair technique provides good patient reported outcomes at 6 months, and allows for improved cosmesis compared with traditional open techniques utilizing a larger surgical incision. It is important to counsel patients with a history of anxiety/depression that while they can expect significant functional improvement, that their improvement may be less than patients without these comorbidities.

No abstract

Background: Many studies have analyzed gymnastics-related injuries in collegiate and elite athletes, but there is minimal literature analyzing the epidemiological characteristics of injuries in the greater gymnastics community. Hypothesis: A higher incidence of injuries in younger gymnasts between the ages of 6 and 15 years compared with those 16 years and older and a difference in the distribution of injuries between male and female gymnasts. Study Design: Retrospective cross-sectional study. Level of Evidence: Level 3. Methods: The National Electronic Injury Surveillance System (NEISS) was queried for all gymnastics-related musculoskeletal injuries presenting to the emergency department (ED) between 2013 and 2020. Incidence was calculated as per 100,000 person-years using the weighted estimates provided by NEISS and national participation data. Chi-square and column proportion z-testing was used to analyze where appropriate. Results: The incidence of gymnastics-related musculoskeletal injuries was 480.7 per 100,000 person-years. Most ED visits were children between the ages of 6 and 15 years (84.0%). Younger gymnasts (ages 6 to 10) were most likely to experience a lower arm fracture, while those over the age of 10 years were most likely to experience an ankle sprain ( P < 0.01). Men and boys presented with a much greater proportion of shoulder injuries (8.0% vs 3.9%), while women and girls presented with a greater proportion of elbow injuries (9.9 % vs 5.9%) and wrist (10.5% vs 8.3%) injuries ( P < 0.01). Conclusion: As hypothesized, most gymnastics-related injuries between 2013 and 2020 were athletes between 6 and 15 years old. Many of these athletes are attempting new, more difficult, skills and are at increased risk of more acute injury when attempting skills they may be unfamiliar with. Clinical Relevance: With increased pressure to specialize at an early age to maintain competitiveness and learn new, higher-level skills compared with their peers, younger athletes are most susceptible to acute injury. New injury prevention strategies could be implemented to help this high-risk population compete and train safely.

No abstract

Preoperative hip joint space width (JSW) of ≤2 mm on plain radiography has been shown to be predictive of intraoperative findings of osteoarthritis, worse functional outcomes, and failure to total hip arthroplasty following hip arthroscopy. However, there is no evidence to suggest that hip joint space greater than 2 mm can definitively rule out the presence of osteoarthritis. We hypothesize that a preoperative JSW of 2 mm or greater does not reliably rule out the presence of high-grade arthritis on hip arthroscopy. Retrospective review of 50 patients who underwent hip arthroscopy between January 11, 2010, and January 3, 2015, at a single institution was performed. Preoperative, standing anteroposterior hip radiographs were reviewed to determine the minimum hip JSW of each operative hip. Operative notes and images were reviewed to determine the Outerbridge classification of cartilage changes on both the acetabulum and femoral head for each patient. High-grade arthritis was defined as a minimum of grade 3 changes on either the femoral head or the acetabulum, which was required for inclusion in the study. The sensitivity of a JSW of 2 mm or less on preoperative radiographs to diagnose a patient with grade 3, grade 4, and grade 3 or 4 arthritis was calculated. Linear regression was used to test for an association between Outerbridge grading and the radiographic minimum JSW. The mean JSW for all patients was 3.5 ± 1.2 mm (range: 0–5.5 mm). Regression found an inverse relationship between joint space and the arthroscopic grading of the articular surfaces (p = 0.0031). However, a preoperative JSW of ≤ 2 mm was only 14.3% sensitive (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.6–51.3%) for predicting Outerbridge grade 3 changes, 7.3% sensitive (95% CI: 2.5–19.4%) for predicting Outerbridge grade 4 changes, and 8.3% sensitive (95% CI: 3.3–20.6%) for predicting Outerbridge grade 3 or 4 changes. The threshold of ≤2 mm of hip JSW on plain radiographs has poor sensitivity for predicting the existence of high-grade arthritis.

Traumatic anterior shoulder dislocations are the most common dislocations of the shoulder, and the recurrence rate is high when they are treated nonoperatively in young patients (<30 years old). This has led to a trend toward early surgical stabilization. Originally open Bankart repair was considered the standard of care, with good clinical outcomes and a low recurrence rate. However, the majority of Bankart repairs are now performed with newer arthroscopic techniques because of their potential advantages and similar results. Both open and arthroscopic repairs have been shown to decrease the recurrence rate to 6% to 23%. Although arthroscopic Bankart repair is now more common, open repair should be considered for younger patients participating in contact sports or military activity, osseous Bankart lesions, revision cases, shoulder instability with "subcritical" (20% to 25%) glenoid bone loss, ligamentous laxity, or cases not considered repairable with arthroscopic techniques. Therefore, knowing how to perform an open Bankart repair is essential. The major steps of the procedure are (1) preoperative planning, (2) induction of anesthesia, (3) patient positioning and setup, (4) examination under anesthesia, (5) possible arthroscopic examination of the shoulder, (6) incision along the anterior axillary fold, (7) exposure using the deltopectoral interval, (8) clavipectoral fascia incision, (9) vertical tenotomy of the subscapularis tendon, (10) dissection of the capsule from the subscapularis, (11) assessment of the quality of the capsule, (12) "T" capsulotomy, (13) repair of the Bankart lesion, (14) anterior capsulorrhaphy, (15) subscapularis repair, (16) possible closure of the rotator interval, (17) wound closure, and (18) postoperative rehabilitation. Studies have shown that surgical stabilization after traumatic anterior shoulder instability decreases the recurrence rate, and open and arthroscopic techniques have similar clinical outcomes.