No abstract

No abstract

With the emergence of high-frequency connected and automated vehicle data, analysts can extract useful information from them. To this end, the concept of “driving volatility” is defined and explored as deviation from the norm. Several measures of dispersion and variation can be computed in different ways using vehicles’ instantaneous speed, acceleration, and jerk observed at intersections. This study explores different measures of volatility, representing newly available surrogate measures of safety, by combining data from the Michigan Safety Pilot Deployment of connected vehicles with crash and inventory data at several intersections. For each intersection, 37 different measures of volatility were calculated. These volatilities were then used to explain crash frequencies at intersection by estimating fixed and random parameter Poisson regression models. Given that volatility reflects the degree to which vehicles move, erratic movements are expected to increase crash risk. Results show that an increase in three measures of driving volatility are positively associated with higher intersection crash frequency, controlling for exposure variables and geometric features. More intersection crashes were associated with higher percentages of vehicle data points (speed & acceleration) lying beyond threshold-bands. These bands were created using mean plus two standard deviations. Furthermore, a higher magnitude of time-varying stochastic volatility of vehicle speeds when they pass through the intersection is associated with higher crash frequencies. These measures can be used to locate intersections with high driving volatilities. A deeper analysis of these intersections can be undertaken, and proactive safety countermeasures considered to enhance safety.

Connected and automated vehicle technologies have the potential to significantly improve transportation system performance. In particular, advanced driver-assistance systems, such as adaptive cruise control (ACC) and cooperative adaptive cruise control (CACC), may lead to substantial improvements in performance by decreasing driver inputs and taking over control of the vehicle. However, the impacts of these technologies on the vehicle- and system-level energy consumption, emissions, and safety have not been quantified in field tests. The goal of this paper is to study the impacts of automated and cooperative systems in mixed traffic containing conventional, ACC, and CACC vehicles. To reach this goal, experimental data based on real-world conditions are collected (in tests conducted by the Federal Highway Administration and the U.S. Department of Transportation) with presence of ACC, CACC, and conventional vehicles in a vehicle platoon scenario and a cooperative merging scenario. Specifically, a platoon of five vehicles with different vehicle type combinations is analyzed to generate new knowledge about potential safety, energy efficiency, and emission improvement from vehicle automation and cooperation. Results show that adopting the CACC system in a five-vehicle platoon substantially reduces the driving volatility and reduces the risk of rear-end collision which consequently improves safety. Furthermore, it decreases fuel consumption and emissions compared with the ACC system and manually-driven vehicles. Results of the merging scenario show that while the cooperative merging system slightly reduces the driving volatility, the fuel consumption and emissions can increase because of sharper accelerations of CACC vehicles compared with manually-driven vehicles.

No abstract