Accumulatormodelsthatintegrateincomingsensoryinformationintomotorplansprovidearobustframeworktounderstanddecisionmaking.However, their applicability to situations that demand a change of plan raises an interesting problem for the brain. This is because interruption of the current motor plan must occur by a competing motor plan, which is necessarily weaker in strength. To understand how changes of mind get expressed in behavior, we used a version of the double-step task called the redirect task, in which monkeys were trained to modify a saccade plan. We microstimulated the frontal eye fields during redirect behavior and systematically measured the deviation of the evoked saccade from the response field to causally track the changing saccade plan. Further, to identify the underlying mechanisms, eight different computational models of redirect behavior were assessed. It was observed that the model that included an independent, spatially specific inhibitory process, in addition to the two accumulators representing the preparatory processes of initial and final motor plans, best predicted the performance and the pattern of saccade deviation profile in the task. Such an inhibitory process suppressed the preparation of the initial motor plan, allowing the final motorplantoproceedunhindered.Thus,changesofmindareconsistentwiththenotionofaspatiallyspecific,inhibitoryprocessthatinhibitsthe current inappropriate plan, allowing expression of the new plan.
How the brain converts parallel representations of movement goals into sequential movements is not known. We tested the role of basal ganglia (BG) in the temporal control of movement sequences by a convergent approach involving inactivation of the BG by muscimol injections into the caudate nucleus of monkeys and assessing behavior of Parkinson's disease patients, performing a modified doublestep saccade task. We tested a critical prediction of a class of competitive queuing models that explains serial behavior as the outcome of a selection of concurrently activated goals. In congruence with these models, we found that inactivation or impairment of the BG unmasked the parallel nature of goal representations such that a significantly greater extent of averaged saccades, curved saccades, and saccade sequence errors were observed. These results suggest that the BG perform a form of competitive queuing, holding the second movement plan in abeyance while the first movement is being executed, allowing the proper temporal control of movement sequences.
Speech processing is one of the required fields in digital signal processing that helps in processing the speech signals. The speech process is utilized in different fields such as emotion recognition, virtual assistants, voice identification, etc. Among the various applications, emotion recognition is one of the critical areas because it is used to recognize people’s exact emotions and eliminate physiological issues. Several researchers utilize signal processing and machine learning techniques together to find the exact human emotions. However, they fail to attain their feelings with less computational complexity and high accuracy. This paper introduces the intelligent computational technique called cat swarm optimized spiking neural network (CSSPNN). Initially, the emotional speech signal is collected from the Toronto emotional speech set (TESS) dataset, which is then processed by applying a wavelet approach to extract the features. The derived features are further examined using the defined classifier CSSPNN, which recognizes human emotions due to the effective training and learning process. Finally, the proficiency of the system is determined using experimental results and discussions. The proposed system recognizes the speech emotions up to 99.3% accuracy compared to recurrent neural networks (RNNs), deep neural networks (DNNs) and deep shallow neural networks (DSNNs).
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.