BACKGROUND Atrial fibrillation after cardiac surgery is associated with increased rates of death, complications, and hospitalizations. In patients with postoperative atrial fibrillation who are in stable condition, the best initial treatment strategy — heart-rate control or rhythm control — remains controversial. METHODS Patients with new-onset postoperative atrial fibrillation were randomly assigned to undergo either rate control or rhythm control. The primary end point was the total number of days of hospitalization within 60 days after randomization, as assessed by the Wilcoxon rank-sum test. RESULTS Postoperative atrial fibrillation occurred in 695 of the 2109 patients (33.0%) who were enrolled preoperatively; of these patients, 523 underwent randomization. The total numbers of hospital days in the rate-control group and the rhythm-control group were similar (median, 5.1 days and 5.0 days, respectively; P = 0.76). There were no significant between-group differences in the rates of death (P = 0.64) or overall serious adverse events (24.8 per 100 patient-months in the rate-control group and 26.4 per 100 patient-months in the rhythm-control group, P = 0.61), including thromboembolic and bleeding events. About 25% of the patients in each group deviated from the assigned therapy, mainly because of drug ineffectiveness (in the rate-control group) or amiodarone side effects or adverse drug reactions (in the rhythm-control group). At 60 days, 93.8% of the patients in the rate-control group and 97.9% of those in the rhythm-control group had had a stable heart rhythm without atrial fibrillation for the previous 30 days (P = 0.02), and 84.2% and 86.9%, respectively, had been free from atrial fibrillation from discharge to 60 days (P = 0.41). CONCLUSIONS Strategies for rate control and rhythm control to treat postoperative atrial fibrillation were associated with equal numbers of days of hospitalization, similar complication rates, and similarly low rates of persistent atrial fibrillation 60 days after onset. Neither treatment strategy showed a net clinical advantage over the other. (Funded by the National Institutes of Health and the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT02132767.)

Background Delirium after surgery is a common condition that leads to poor outcomes. Few studies have examined the effect of postoperative delirium on outcomes after cardiac surgery. Objectives To assess the relationship between delirium after cardiac surgery and the following outcomes: length of stay after surgery, prevalence of falls, discharge to a nursing facility, discharge to home with home health services, and use of inpatient physical therapy. Methods Electronic medical records of 656 cardiac surgery patients were reviewed retrospectively. Results Postoperative delirium occurred in 161 patients (24.5%). Patients with postoperative delirium had significantly longer stays (P < .001) and greater prevalence of falls (P < .001) than did patients without delirium. Patients with delirium also had a significantly greater likelihood for discharge to a nursing facility (P < .001) and need for home health services if discharged to home (P < .001) and a significantly higher need for inpatient physical therapy (P < .001). Compared with patients without postoperative delirium, patients who had this complication were more likely to have received zolpidem and benzodiazepines postoperatively and to have a history of arrhythmias, renal disease, and congestive heart failure. Conclusions Patients who have delirium after cardiac surgery have poorer outcomes than do similar patients without this complication. Development and implementation of an extensive care plan to address postoperative delirium is necessary for cardiac surgery patients who are at risk for or have delirium after the surgery.

IMPORTANCE Stroke is a major complication of surgical aortic valve replacement. OBJECTIVE To determine the effectiveness and safety of cerebral embolic protection devices in reducing ischemic central nervous system injury during surgical aortic valve replacement DESIGN, SETTING and PARTICIPANTS A parallel-group trial conducted in 18 North American centers, randomizing patients with calcific aortic stenosis undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement between March 2015 and July 2016. INTERVENTIONS Use of one of two cerebral embolic protection devices (suction-based extraction;n=118 or intra-aortic filtration device;n=133) versus a standard aortic cannula (n=132) at the time of surgical aortic valve replacement. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary endpoint was freedom from clinical or radiographic central nervous system (CNS) infarction at 7±3 days post-procedure. Secondary endpoints included a composite of clinical ischemic stroke, acute kidney injury, and death ≤30 days after surgery; delirium; mortality; serious adverse events and neurocognition. RESULTS Among 383 randomized patients (mean age 73.9, 38.4% women), freedom from CNS infarction at 7 days did not differ between suction-based extraction and controls (32.0 vs. 33.3%,difference −1.3,95%CI−13.8, 11.2) nor between intra-aortic filtration and controls (25.6% vs 32.4%, −6.9,95%CI−17.9, 4.2). Clinical stroke occurred in 5.1% suction-based extraction vs 5.8% controls (−0.7, 95%CI −6.5, 5.1) and 8.3% intra-aortic filtration vs. 6.1% controls (2.2, 95%CI −4.1, 8.4). Delirium trajectories (baseline to day 7) differed for suction-based extraction vs. control (p= 0.03) and intra-aortic filtration vs. control (p=0.02); by day 7, 6.3% of suction-based extraction vs 15.3% of control patients (−9.1, 95%CI −17.1, −1.0), and 8.1% of intra-aortic filtration vs 15.6% of control patients (−7.4, 95%CI−15.5, 0.6) experienced delirium. The 30-day composite endpoint did not differ between suction-based extraction and controls (21.4% vs 24.2%; −2.8, 95%CI −13.5,7.9) nor between intra-aortic filtration and controls (33.3% vs 23.7%; 9.7, 95%CI −1.2,20.5). Neurocognitive outcomes were not different between groups except for less decline in executive function in intra-aortic filtration vs controls (p=0.05). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE The incidence of CNS infarction after surgical aortic valve replacement was not altered by either embolic protection device. Potential benefits for delirium reduction, cognition and symptomatic stroke merit larger trials with longer follow-up.

Kaposi sarcoma (KS)-associated herpesvirus (KSHV)–associated multicentric Castleman disease (MCD) is a relapsing and remitting systemic lymphoproliferative disorder characterized by severe inflammatory symptoms most common among people living with HIV (PLWH). Patients with KSHV-MCD may present with concurrent KSHV-associated diseases, such as KS and/or primary effusion lymphoma (PEL). We evaluated clinical and immunologic characteristics, the effects of concurrent KSHV malignancies, and treatments from the largest prospective natural history study of participants with KSHV-MCD within the United States. Treatment options administered at investigator discretion included high-dose zidovudine with valganciclovir (AZT/VGC), rituximab, or rituximab with liposomal doxorubicin (R-Dox) during KSHV-MCD flares. Survival analyses and prognostic factors were explored for all participants. Sixty-two participants with HIV were enrolled, including 20 with KSHV-MCD alone, 34 with KSHV-MCD and KS, 1 with KSHV-MCD and PEL, and 7 with all KSHV-associated diseases. Forty-four percent of KSHV-MCD diagnoses were made at our institution. Forty-four participants received rituximab-based therapies, 20 of whom had maintenance AZT/VGC or interferon. Participants receiving R-Dox and then maintenance AZT/VGC had the highest 5-year progression-free survival (89%). Cytokine profiles during KSHV-MCD flares did not differ by the presence of concurrent KSHV-associated diseases. The 10-year survival was 71% (95% confidence interval [CI], 56% to 82%) for all participants. A concurrent diagnosis of PEL negatively impacted survival (PEL hazard ratio, 5.4; 95% CI, 1.8 to 16.8). KSHV-MCD is an underdiagnosed condition among PLWH, including those with KS. KSHV-MCD has an excellent prognosis with appropriate treatment. Physicians should be alert for patients with multiple KSHV diseases, which impact optimal treatment and survival outcomes. This study was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT00099073.

BackgroundNon-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) is currently the most common malignancy among people living with HIV (PLWH) in the USA. NHL in PLWH is more frequently associated with oncogenic viruses than NHL in immunocompetent individuals and is generally associated with increased PD-1 expression and T cell exhaustion. An effective immune-based second-line approach that is less immunosuppressive than chemotherapy may decrease infection risk, improve immune control of oncogenic viruses, and ultimately allow for better lymphoma control.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective study of patients with HIV-associated lymphomas treated with pembrolizumab±pomalidomide in the HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute.ResultsWe identified 10 patients with stage IV relapsed and/or primary refractory HIV-associated NHL who were treated with pembrolizumab, an immune checkpoint inihibitor, with or without pomalidomide. Five patients had primary effusion lymphoma (PEL): one had germinal center B cell-like (GCB) diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL); two had non-GCB DLBCL; one had aggressive B cell lymphoma, not otherwise specified; and one had plasmablastic lymphoma. Six patients received pembrolizumab alone at 200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks, three received pembrolizumab 200 mg intravenously every 4 weeks plus pomalidomide 4 mg orally every day for days 1–21 of a 28-day cycle; and one sequentially received pembrolizumab alone and then pomalidomide alone. The response rate was 50% with particular benefit in gammaherpesvirus-associated tumors. The progression-free survival was 4.1 months (95% CI: 1.3 to 12.4) and overall survival was 14.7 months (95% CI: 2.96 to not reached). Three patients with PEL had leptomeningeal disease: one had a complete response and the other two had long-term disease control. There were four immune-related adverse events (irAEs), all CTCAEv5 grade 2–3; three of the four patients were able to continue receiving pembrolizumab. No irAEs occurred in patients receiving the combination of pembrolizumab and pomalidomide.ConclusionsTreatment of HIV-associated NHL with pembrolizumab with or without pomalidomide elicited responses in several subtypes of HIV-associated NHL. This approach is worth further study in PLWH and NHL.

Objective: There are four conditions caused by Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV): Kaposi sarcoma, KSHV-associated multicentric Castleman disease (MCD), primary effusion lymphoma (PEL), and KSHV inflammatory cytokine syndrome (KICS). These KSHV-associated disorders (KADs) often occur in people with HIV and can lead to multiorgan dysfunction requiring admission to the ICU. However, little is known about patient outcomes in this setting.Methods: A retrospective study of patients with KADs admitted to the ICU between 2010 and 2021 was conducted, examining KAD admission diagnoses, HIV characteristics, selected cytokine profiles, and ICU interventions. Primary outcomes were 60-day and median overall survival from ICU admission to death from any cause.Results: Forty-seven patients (all but one with HIV coinfection) were included. At ICU admission, 44 patients (94%) were on antiretroviral therapy with a median CD4 þ count of 88 cells/ml and HIV viral load of 23 copies/ml. The most common presentation was respiratory failure alone (19%) or with hypotension (17%). Twenty-two (47%) patients had presumed KICS (with or without Kaposi sarcoma) at admission and an additional KAD was diagnosed in 36% of these patients. IL-6 levels did not vary across KAD subtype. Twenty (43%) patients received KAD-directed therapy in the ICU. Sixty-day survival was 70% and median overall survival was 9 months. Conclusion:The majority of patients with HIV and KADs admitted to the ICU had well controlled HIV. Additional KAD were diagnosed during ICU admission in a proportion of patients who presented with presumed KICS. Critical illness did not preclude a subset of patients from receiving KAD-directed therapy in the ICU.

Anal dysplasia can lead to anal cancer, which affects persons living with HIV (PLWH) more than people in the general population. Screening for anal dysplasia is recommended to detect anal cancer at an early stage. The aim of our process improvement project was to improve compliance and consistency in implementing anal dysplasia screening for PLWH receiving care at a Ryan White facility covering 18 counties in western North Carolina. There were 291 PLWH screened for anal dysplasia during the 9-month data-gathering period. The compliance rate significantly increased from a preintervention rate of 31.3% to 57.5% (p < .001). There were 109 (37.5%) abnormal screening results. PLWH who had abnormal screening results were more likely to be White. Gender and age were not significantly associated with abnormal screening results. Anal dysplasia screening is a simple procedure to detect precursors to cancer that can be integrated into the primary care of PLWH.

Background: Primary effusion lymphoma (PEL) is a rare, aggressive B-cell neoplasm strongly associated with HIV infection. It generally presents with malignant effusions but may also present with extracavitary (EC) masses. It is caused by the gammaherpesvirus Kaposi sarcoma herpesvirus (KSHV, also called human herpesvirus 8), which is also responsible for the development of Kaposi sarcoma (KS) and a form of multicentric Castleman disease (MCD). There are no prospective studies in PEL and no standard therapy. Prognosis is poor compared to other HIV-associated lymphomas with median survival of 10-22 months when treated with conventional lymphoma chemotherapy regimens. In vitro data demonstrate lenalidomide (LEN), an immunomodulatory agent, downregulates IRF4, a cell activation marker overexpressed in PEL, and can reverse KSHV-induced downregulation of MHC-1 and ICAM-1. Dose-adjusted infusional etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and prednisone combined with rituximab (EPOCH-R) has been shown to be safe and effective for CD20+ HIV-associated lymphomas. While PEL is generally CD20 negative, rituximab eradicates the KSHV-infected B-cell reservoir, a source of inflammatory cytokines that drive the natural history of PEL; moreover, many patients have concurrent MCD for which rituximab is a standard treatment. Methods: In a prospective phase 1/2 study conducted in the HIV and AIDS Malignancy Branch at the National Cancer Institute (NCI), we are evaluating EPOCH combined with rituximab and LEN (EPOCH-R2) in participants (pts) with untreated PEL. The primary objective was to evaluate safety and tolerability of EPOCH-R2 and determine the recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of LEN. PEL was diagnosed/confirmed in the NCI Laboratory of Pathology via cytology and/or flow cytometry of effusions or via biopsy in EC disease. Pts received EPOCH-R days 1-5 and every 21 days for 6 cycles. LEN was administered orally days 1-10 of each cycle starting at 25 mg (with dose de-escalation if toxicity occurred). Dose-limiting toxicities were evaluated during cycles 1-2. Pts with leptomeningeal PEL (CSF-PEL), determined by cytology and/or flow cytometry of cerebrospinal fluid, received intrathecal chemotherapy; intrathecal prophylaxis was given to pts without CSF-PEL. All pts received thromboprophylaxis (aspirin 81 mg daily), opportunistic infection prophylaxis, and antiretroviral therapy (ART). Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated using CTCAEv5 and treatment response was evaluated by Lugano criteria after cycles 2 and 6. Response to treatment, immune reconstitution, and overall survival (OS) were evaluated using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank test and Kaplan-Meier methodology. Results: We are reporting results of the completed Phase I portion of the trial. 6 HIV+ cisgender men (5 Black, 1 White) with stage 4 PEL were enrolled July 2017-August 2019. All received non-boosted integrase inhibitor-based ART. 3 had pleural effusions, 2 had EC disease without effusions, and 1 had both effusions and EC disease. 3 had CSF-PEL and 1 had bone marrow involvement. 4 had concurrent KS; 1 also had concurrent MCD. Median CD4+was 231 cells/µL (IQR: 10, 310) at baseline and 189.5 cell/µL (IQR: 56, 224) at end-of-treatment, which was not a significant decline (p=0.46). The most common AEs were hematologic, including grade (G) 4 neutropenia (100%), leukopenia (100%), thrombocytopenia (67%) and CD4+ lymphopenia (67%). 3 pts (50%) developed G3 pulmonary emboli despite thromboprophylaxis. There were 7 episodes of G3 febrile neutropenia and 2 episodes of sepsis. No pts developed opportunistic infections. There were no dose-limiting toxicities and LEN 25 mg is the RP2D. 4 pts completed all 6 cycles. 2 pts completed 5 cycles: 1 died due to progressive disease and 1 had progressive disease and went on to receive additional therapy. 1 pt who completed all 6 treatment cycles died due to HIV-related complications 5 months after EPOCH-R2 with no evidence of PEL at autopsy. The response rate was 83.3% (95% CI: 36.8-99.6) and 50% (95% CI: 11.8-88.1) after cycles 2 and 6, respectively. 2-year overall survival was 66.7% (95% CI:19.5-90.4). Conclusions: Front-line PEL treatment with EPOCH-R2 is safe, and the most common toxicities were hematologic. This regimen showed preliminary evidence of activity and good OS, which will be further evaluated in the ongoing phase 2. Disclosures Lurain: Celgene: Research Funding; EMD-Serrono: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Ramaswami:Celgene: Research Funding; EMD-Serrono: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. Whitby:Patent: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor on US Patent 10,001,483 entitled "Methods for the treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma or KSHV-induced lymphoma using immunomodulatory compounds, and uses of biomarkers.. Uldrick:Patent: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor on US Patent 10,001,483 entitled "Methods for the treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma or KSHV-induced lymphoma using immunomodulatory compounds, and uses of biomarkers."; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding; Roche: Research Funding. Yarchoan:Patent: Patents & Royalties: Coinventor on patents on a peptide vaccine for HIV and on the treatment of Kaposi sarcoma with IL12; EMD-Serrono: Patents & Royalties; Patent: Patents & Royalties: Co-inventor on US Patent 10,001,483 entitled "Methods for the treatment of Kaposi's sarcoma or KSHV-induced lymphoma using immunomodulatory compounds, and uses of biomarkers.; Patent: Patents & Royalties: An immediate family member of R. Yarchoan is a co-inventor on patents related to internalization of target receptors, on KSHV viral IL-6, and on the use of calreticulin and calreticulin fragments to inhibit angiogenesis; Celgene: Research Funding; Merck: Research Funding. OffLabel Disclosure: Dose-adjusted infusional etoposide, vincristine, and doxorubicin with cyclophosphamide and prednisone combined with rituximab and lenalidomide for the use of primary effusion lymphoma will be discussed.