The histologic distinction between dermatofibrosarcoma protuberans (DFSP) and the fibrous type of benign fibrous histiocytoma (dermatofibroma, DF) may be extremely difficult. In this study, we evaluated the extent and pattern of immunoreactivity of both CD34 and factor XIIIa in a large number of DFSPs and DFs in order to determine the utility of these markers in their distinction. Using histologic criteria alone, the authors independently evaluated and agreed upon 30 cases of DF and 24 cases of DFSP, and a representative section was stained with antibodies to both factor XIIIa and CD34. Immunopositivity was evaluated semiquantitatively and assigned a score from 0 to 5. CD34 immunoreactivity was seen in 22 (92%) of 24 DFSPs (mean CD34 score, 4.60 +/- 0.3). Only 12 (40%) of 30 DFs showed CD34 immunopositivity (mean CD34 score, 0.6 +/- 0.1). Factor XIIIa was seen in 29 (97%) of 30 DFs (mean factor-XIIIa score, 4.1 +/- 0.3). In contrast, 18 (75%) of 24 DFSPs stained for factor XIIIa (mean factor-XIIIa score, 1.3 +/- 0.2), but in most of these cases the factor-XIIIa-positive cells were felt to be entrapped nonneoplastic dermal dendrocytes. Thus, an immunoprofile using antibodies to CD34 and factor XIIIa is capable of distinguishing between DFSP and the fibrous type of DF in the vast majority of cases, as long as there is recognition that there may be some CD34-positive cells in DFs, as well as some factor-XIIIa-positive cells in DFSPs.
This represents one of the largest randomized, controlled trials of adjuvant vaccine therapy in human cancer reported to date. Compliance with randomization was excellent, with only 2% refusing assigned therapy. There is no evidence of improved disease-free survival among patients randomized to receive vaccine, although the power to detect a small but clinically significant difference was low. Future investigations of adjuvant vaccine approaches for patients with intermediate-thickness melanoma should involve larger numbers of patients and ideally should include sentinel node biopsy staging.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.