RGC responses to electrical stimulation depend on the current pulse duration and location of the stimulating electrode. For an epiretinal prosthesis, short-duration current pulses may be preferable since they result in a more localized activation of the retina.

The results suggest that cathodal stimulation should produce lower thresholds, more localized stimulation, and somewhat better selectivity for cell bodies over axons than would anodal stimulation.

Retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) can be activated electrically either directly or indirectly (via the retinal neural network). Previous studies have shown that RGCs can follow high stimulus rates (> or = 200 pulses s(-1)) when directly activated. In the present study, we investigated how well RGCs can follow repetitive stimulation of the neural network. We studied the responses (spike activity) of RGCs in isolated rabbit retina to stimulation with paired pulses applied at different interpulse intervals and trains of pulses applied at different frequencies. We found that the response amplitude of a RGC to a current pulse applied soon (< or = 400 ms) after a preceding current pulse is diminished. This depression in response amplitude became greater as the interval between pulses became shorter. At an interpulse interval of 15 ms (shortest tested), the response amplitude to the second current pulse was reduced on average 94%. When a train of ten stimulus pulses was applied, further depression was observed, particularly at high stimulation frequencies. The depression with each successive pulse was relatively moderate compared to the depression to the second pulse. The results of this study have implications for the design of electrical stimulation strategies in a retinal prosthesis.

Rational selection of electrical stimulus parameters for an electronic retinal prosthesis requires knowledge of the electrophysiological responses of retinal neurons to electrical stimuli. In this study, we examined the effects of cathodal and anodal current pulses on the extracellularly recorded responses of OFF and ON rabbit retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) in an in vitro preparation. Current pulses (1 msec duration), delivered by a 125 microm electrode placed on the inner retinal surface within the receptive field of a RGC, produced both short-latency (< or =5 msec) and long-latency (8-60 msec) responses. The long-latency responses, but not the short-latency responses, were abolished upon application of the glutamate receptor antagonists CNQX and NBQX, thus indicating that the long-latency responses of RGCs are due to activation of presynaptic neurons in the retina. The latency of the long-latency response depended upon the polarity of the stimulus. For OFF RGCs, the average latency was 11 msec for a cathodal stimulus and 24 msec for an anodal stimulus. For ON RGCs, the average latency was 25 msec for a cathodal stimulus and 16 msec for an anodal stimulus. The threshold current also depended upon the polarity of the stimulus, at least for OFF RGCs. The average threshold current for evoking a long-latency response in OFF RGCs was 10 microA for a cathodal stimulus and 21 microA for an anodal stimulus. In ON RGCs, the average threshold current was 13 microA for a cathodal stimulus and 15 microA for an anodal stimulus.

No abstract