Toxin-antitoxin (TA) systems are small genetic elements found on plasmids or chromosomes of countless bacteria, archaea, and possibly also unicellular fungi. Under normal growth conditions, the activity of the toxin protein or its translation is counteracted by an antitoxin protein or noncoding RNA. Five types of TA systems have been proposed that differ markedly in their genetic architectures and modes of activity control. Subtle regulatory properties, frequently responsive to environmental cues, impact the behavior of TA systems. Typically, stress conditions result in the degradation or depletion of the antitoxin. Unleashed toxin proteins impede or alter cellular processes including translation, DNA replication, or ATP or cell wall synthesis. TA toxin activity can then result in cell death or in the formation of drug-tolerant persister cells. The versatile properties of TA systems have also been exploited in biotechnology and may aid in combating infectious diseases.

Previously it has been demonstrated that Staphylococcus aureus is sensitive toward Pseudomonas-secreted exotoxins, which preferentially target the electron transport chain in staphylococci. Here it is shown that a subpopulation of S. aureus survives these respiratory toxins of Pseudomonas aeruginosa by selection of the small-colony variant (SCV) phenotype. Purified pyocyanin alone causes the same effect. A hemB mutant of S. aureus survives cocultivation with P. aeruginosa without a decrease in CFU.Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus are opportunistic pathogens and frequently coinfect the lungs of patients with cystic fibrosis (CF). P. aeruginosa excretes an arsenal of small respiratory inhibitors, like pyocyanin (5), hydrogen cyanide (2), or quinoline N-oxides (9), that may act against the commensal microbiota as well as host cells. Previously it has been demonstrated that S. aureus is sensitive toward the toxic products generated by P. aeruginosa and that these exotoxins preferentially target the electron transport chain (17).Staphylococcal species can be divided into two groups: the sensitive group, comprising pathogenic species such as S. aureus and S. epidermidis, and the resistant group, represented by nonpathogenic species such as S. carnosus, S. piscifermentans, and S. gallinarum. The resistance in the latter group was due to cydAB genes, which encode a pyocyanin-and cyanide-resistant cytochrome bd quinol oxidase (17). It has also been shown that the resistant or sensitive phenotype is determined by the CydB subunit, which is part of the cytochrome bd quinol oxidase of S. aureus. Despite its sensitivity to these exotoxins, S. aureus has frequently been coisolated with P. aeruginosa from the skin, eyes, and catheter infections and from the lungs of patients with CF. The aim of this study is to elucidate the escape mechanism of S. aureus by cocultivating S. aureus and P. aeruginosa. The findings indicate that a subpopulation of the staphylococcal community can survive in the presence of P. aeruginosa by the selection of small-colony variants (SCVs), which usually are defective in the electron transport chain. SCVs grow as tiny, nonpigmented colonies and are auxotrophic to hemin, menadione, or thymidine (14). Here we show that both a culture supernatant of P. aeruginosa and purified pyocyanin select for the SCV phenotype in S. aureus.Cocultivation of S. aureus and P. aeruginosa can select for S. aureus SCVs. S. aureus was grown in monoculture or in coculture with P. aeruginosa (1:1, optical density at 578 nm) in tryptic soy broth (TSB) medium under biofilm or planktonic conditions. Biofilm studies using S. aureus(pCtuf-gfp) and P. aeruginosa::pUT-tell-rfp grown in TSB medium supplemented with 0.5% glucose under static conditions for 36 h showed that both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa form thicker biofilm in monocultures, while in a mixed biofilm with P. aeruginosa only few S. aureus cells were visible (Fig. 1A).Titers of S. aureus grown under planktonic conditions in monoculture and in coculture w...

Bacterial persister cells are non- or slow-growing reversible phenotypic variants of the wild type, tolerant to bactericidal antibiotics. We analyzed here Staphylococcus aureus persister levels by monitoring colony-forming unit counts of planktonically grown cells treated with six different antimicrobials over time. The model laboratory strains HG001–HG003, SA113 and the small colony variant (SCV) strains hemB and menD were challenged by the compounds at different logs of minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in exponential or stationary growth phase. Antibiotic tolerance was usually elevated in SCV strains compared to normally growing cells and in stationary versus exponential phase cultures. Biphasic killing kinetics, typical for persister cell enrichment, were observed in both growth phases under different selective conditions. Treatment of exponential phase cultures of HG001–HG003 with 10-fold MIC of tobramycin resulted in the isolation of persisters which upon cultivation on plates formed either normal or phenotypically stable small colonies. Trajectories of different killing curves indicated physiological heterogeneity within persister subpopulations. Daptomycin added at 100-fold MIC to stationary phase SA113 cells rapidly isolated very robust persisters. Fractions of antibiotic-tolerant cells were observed with all S. aureus strains and mutants tested. Our results refute the hypothesis that S. aureus stationary phase cells are equivalent to persisters, as not all of these cells showed antibiotic tolerance. Isolation of S. aureus persisters of different robustness seems to depend on the kind and concentration of the antibiotic, as well as on the strain used.

SummaryInducible gene expression based upon Tet repressor (tet regulation) is a broadly applied tool in molecular genetics. In its original environment, Tet repressor (TetR) negatively controls tetracycline (tc) resistance in bacteria. In the presence of tc, TetR is induced and detaches from its cognate DNA sequence tetO, so that a tc antiporter protein is expressed. In this article, we provide a comprehensive overview about tet regulation in bacteria and illustrate the parameters of different regulatory architectures. While some of these set‐ups rely on natural tet‐control regions like those found on transposon Tn10, highly efficient variations of this system have recently been adapted to different Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria. Novel tet‐controllable artificial or hybrid promoters were employed for target gene expression. They are controlled by regulators expressed at different levels either in a constitutive or in an autoregulated manner. The resulting tetsystems have been used for various purposes. We discuss integrative elements vested with tc‐sensitive promoters, as well as tet regulation in Gram‐negative and Gram‐positive bacteria for analytical purposes and for protein overproduction. Also the use of TetR as an in vivo biosensor for tetracyclines or as a regulatory device in synthetic biology constructs is outlined. Technical specifications underlying different regulatory set‐ups are highlighted, and finally recent developments concerning variations of TetR are presented, which may expand the use of prokaryotic tet systems in the future.