Since approximately 30% to 40% of autogenous vein bypass grafts to the femoropopliteal level may occlude within 5 years of implantation, additional vein will be required for subsequent revisions. We undertook a study to determine whether the preferential use of an above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft to save vein is an appropriate option. We reviewed our experience with 114 above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass reconstructions. Life-table analysis of primary and secondary graft patency was carried out by the method of Peto and statistically analyzed for the influence of clinical indication, runoff as determined by both preoperative and intraoperative completion arteriography, smoking, and diabetes. The 5-year primary patency rate of 57% for patients with claudication was comparable to contemporary randomized or retrospective series with below-knee autogenous vein for that indication, and it was superior to the patency rate for limb salvage. The status of the runoff vessels was an important determinant of outcome. The 59 limbs with good arteriographic runoff (2 to 3 vessels) had a markedly higher 5-year patency rate (70%) than the poor arteriographic runoff (0 to 1 vessels) group (30%). Continued cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus also appeared to affect adversely primary graft patency in our hands. Our data support the use of preferential above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in patients with good angiographic runoff. This approach does not appear to prejudice the limb against secondary revisionary procedures or the use of a new autogenous graft, if required.
Since approximately 30% to 40% of autogenous vein bypass grafts to the femoropopliteal level may occlude within 5 years of implantation, additional vein will be required for subsequent revisions. We undertook a study to determine whether the preferential use of an above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass graft to save vein is an appropriate option. We reviewed our experience with 114 above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene bypass reconstructions. Life-table analysis of primary and secondary graft patency was carried out by the method of Peto and statistically analyzed for the influence of clinical indication, runoff as determined by both preoperative and intraoperative completion arteriography, smoking, and diabetes. The 5-year primary patency rate of 57% for patients with claudication was comparable to contemporary randomized or retrospective series with below-knee autogenous vein for that indication, and it was superior to the patency rate for limb salvage. The status of the runoff vessels was an important determinant of outcome. The 59 limbs with good arteriographic runoff (2 to 3 vessels) had a markedly higher 5-year patency rate (70%) than the poor arteriographic runoff (0 to 1 vessels) group (30%). Continued cigarette smoking and diabetes mellitus also appeared to affect adversely primary graft patency in our hands. Our data support the use of preferential above-knee expanded polytetrafluoroethylene grafts in patients with good angiographic runoff. This approach does not appear to prejudice the limb against secondary revisionary procedures or the use of a new autogenous graft, if required.
Because of uncertainty existing in respect to the etiologic factors in certain cases of constrictive pericarditis, an analysis of 25 proven cases and of additional series from the literature was conducted. It was evident that a fairly consistent clinical syndrome developed, but the factor of myocardial insufficiency deserves as much consideration as actual constriction by the pericardium. The survey supports the belief that the clinical picture of chronic constrictive pericarditis may result from tuberculosis in most cases, at times only by implication. In addition, cases can result from trauma to the chest, rheumatic heart disease and purulent pericarditis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.