Background:Intrathecal neostigmine and magnesium sulfate (MgSO4) produce substantial antinociception, potentiate analgesia of bupivacaine without neurotoxicity.Aims:The aim was to investigate the effect of neostigmine and MgSO4 on characteristics of spinal anesthesia (SA), hemodynamic stability and postoperative analgesia when added to 0.5% hyperbaric bupivacaine for SA.Subjects and Methods:In this prospective, randomized, double-blind study 75 American Society of Anesthesiologist status I and II adult females posted for major gynecological surgery were assigned to one of the three groups (n = 25). Group N received Neostigmine 25 μg, Group M received MgSO4 50 mg, Group C received 0.5 ml saline as an adjuvant to 17.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Onset, duration of block, heart rate, mean arterial pressure, postoperative analgesia, analgesic requirement, and adverse effects were recorded. Data expressed as mean (standard deviation) or number (%). P <0.05 were statistically significant.Results:The three groups were comparable in characteristics of SA. The mean duration of analgesia was significantly longer in Group N (5.1 h) followed by Group M (4.2 h) and Group C (3.8 h) (P = 0.0134). Analgesic requirement was significantly less in Group N followed by Group M and Group C (P = 0.00232). The pain score was significantly less in Group M (P < 0.05). The incidence of hypotension and vasopressor requirement was lowest (48%) in Group N than in Group M (64%) and Group C 84% (P = 0.0276). The incidence of bradycardia and atropine requirement was the lowest in Group M (P = 0.0354). Sedation was observed in 56% patients in Group M compared to 20% in Group N and 8% in Group C (P = 0.0004).Conclusion:Intrathecal Neostigmine and MgSo4 does not affect characteristics of SA. Postoperative analgesia of neostigmine was better than MgSO4. Neostigmine provides some protection against hypotension of SA whereas MgSO4 protects against bradycardia.

Background:The study was planned to assess the comparative efficacy, safety and duration of analgesia produced by low-dose clonidine and midazolam when used as adjuvant for spinal anesthesia.Materials and Methods:This is a randomized, participant and observer blind, prospective, parallel group clinical trial. Fifty ASA grade I and II patients posted for lower abdominal surgery were randomly allocated into two groups. BC group received spinal clonidine 30 μg and BM group received preservative-free midazolam 2 mg with 15 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine. Postoperative analgesia, analgesic requirement in 24 hours, onset and duration of block, hemodynamic stability and adverse effects were observed (P<0.05 – considered significant, P<0.01 considered highly significant).Results:The duration of postoperative analgesia was prolonged in BM group (391.64 ± 132.98 min) than BC group (296.60 ± 52.77 min) (P<0.01). The mean verbal rating pain score was significantly less in BM group than BC group (P<0.01). The number of analgesic doses in 24 hours were significantly less in BM group (P<0.05). Nine patients (36%) in BC group required additional analgesia as against none in BM group (P<0.01). The onset of sensory block and peak sensory level was significantly earlier in BM group as compared to BC group. Duration of sensory block was longer in BM group (P<0.05). Subjects in BC group(36%) had bradycardia as compared to none in BM group (P<0.01). Hypotension was observed in 44% patients in BC group as against 16% in BM group (P<0.05).Conclusion:Postoperative analgesia with clonidine is short lived with some bradycardia. Intrathecal midazolam provides superior analgesia without clinically relevant adverse effects.

No abstract

BACKGROUNDSellick's maneuver is used for the prevention of pulmonary aspiration in emergency situation. To evaluate the efficacy of Sellick's maneuver controlled trials were not done up till now because of ethical and legal issue. On the background of recent updates, we have planned to evaluate the emergency laparotomy and obstetric cases of last four and a half years for the risk of pulmonary.