Virtual reality (VR) can be a very effective tool to evaluate built environment to support improvement of pedestrian and other vulnerable road user safety. However, in order to draw actionable conclusions from VR it is important to understand the degree to which pedestrians’ perceptions and behaviors match across real and virtual environments. In this study, participants experienced equivalent real and virtual environments and performed similar tasks in each. Tasks included pedestrian’ intention to cross, estimation of speed and distance of an approaching vehicle, and the perceived safety and risk of crossing a road. Pedestrians’ presence was also measured in all environments. Result showed that there were no differences between the real and virtual environments for most of the tasks. Significant differences between real and virtual environments were observed in the estimation of speed and measures of presence. These results have important implications for using VR as tool to evaluate pedestrian safety in built environments.

Nighttime crashes at intersections present a major traffic safety issue in the United States. Existing approach to intersection lighting design does not account for a driver's visual performance or the potential interactive effects of vehicle headlamps and roadway lighting. For effective design lighting at intersection, empirical research is required to evaluate the effects of lighting configuration (part of the intersection illuminated) and lighting levels on nighttime driver visual performance. The current study had two goals. First, to quantify visual performance in three lighting configurations (illuminating the intersection box, approach, or both). Second, to determine what lighting levels within each lighting configuration support the best visual performance. The study involved a target detection task, completed at night on a realistic roadway intersection.Illuminating the intersection box led to superior visual performance, as indicated by longer target detection distances, fewer missed targets, and more targets identified within a safe stopping distance. For this lighting configuration, visual performance plateaued between 7 and 10 lux of mean intersection illuminance. These results have important implications for the design of intersection lighting at isolated/rural intersections, specifically that illuminating the intersection box is an effective strategy to increase nighttime visual performance for a wider range of driver ages and could also be an energy efficient solution.

light-emitting diode technology being applied to roadway lighting, the spectral power distribution of the light source is becoming much more important. In this experiment, the detection of pedestrians at five adaptation levels under three light sources, high pressure sodium and light emitting diodes of two color temperatures, was measured in realistic roadway scenarios. The results show that while the light source type was not significant, an increase in adaptation luminance also increased the detection distance. As the offset of the object to the roadway increased, some spectral effects became more significant; however, this effect was not consistent across all angles of eccentricity. The conclusions from this work indicate that mesopic factors may not be applicable on high-speed roads.

No abstract

Almost all existing research about intersection lighting indicates that the presence of lighting reduces nighttime crashes. This study aimed to quantify the effect of lighting level and lighting quality on the night-to-day (ND) crash ratios at rural intersections. Illuminance measurements were collected from 99 lighted and unlighted rural intersections in Virginia. The measurements were then combined with the crash data, obtained from the Virginia Department of Transportation, for each of the intersections. A negative binomial regression was used to model the crash and lighting data. Results indicated that lighting level (average horizontal illuminance) significantly affected the ND crash ratios at rural intersections. A 1 lux (lx) increase in the average horizontal illuminance at all rural intersections in Virginia corresponded to a 7% decrease in the ND crash ratio. For the lighted intersections, a 1 lx increase in average horizontal illuminance corresponded to a 9% decrease in the ND crash ratio. The largest decrease in the ND crash ratio was for unlighted intersections, where a 1 lx increase in the average horizontal illuminance corresponded to a 21% decrease. Stop-controlled intersections had smaller ND crash ratios than signalized intersections. Intersections with a posted speed limit of less than or equal to 40 mph had lower ND crash ratios than intersections with a posted speed limit of greater than 40 mph. Each of the results is discussed with respect to the impacts of the lighting measurements on nighttime driving safety and overall visibility.