The preference of phytoplankton for ammonium over nitrate has traditionally been explained by the greater metabolic cost of reducing oxidized forms of nitrogen. This "metabolic cost hypothesis" implies that there should be a growth disadvantage on nitrate compared to ammonium or other forms of reduced nitrogen such as urea, especially when light limits growth, but in a variety of phytoplankton taxa, this predicted difference has not been observed. Our experiments with three strains of marine Synechococcus (WH7803, WH7805, and WH8112) did not reveal consistently faster growth (cell division) on ammonium or urea as compared to nitrate. Urease and glutamine synthetase (GS) activities varied with nitrogen source in a manner consistent with regulation by cellular nitrogen status via NtcA (rather than by external availability of nitrogen) in all three strains and indicated that each strain experienced some degree of nitrogen insufficiency during growth on nitrate. At light intensities that strongly limited growth, the composition (carbon, nitrogen, and pigment quotas) of WH7805 cells using nitrate was indistinguishable from that of cells using ammonium, but at saturating light intensities, cellular carbon, nitrogen, and pigment quotas were significantly lower in cells using nitrate than ammonium. These and similar results from other phytoplankton taxa suggest that a limitation in some step of nitrate uptake or assimilation, rather than the extra cost of reducing nitrate per se, may be the cause of differences in growth and physiology between cells using nitrate and ammonium.

Benefits and trade-offs of blue/green chromatic acclimation (CA4) have received limited study. We investigated the energetic costs associated with executing chromatic acclimation using a fluorescence-based calculation of light use efficiency. Using laboratory cultures and artificial light environments, we show that the delayed response to acclimation known to occur in marine Synechococcus acclimating strains (generalists) in green light do not reduce light use efficiency in green light, but that only one generalist, RCC307, with a much smaller range of acclimation, had higher light use efficiency than blue and green light specialist strains. Generalists with a wider acclimation range either had the same or >30% lower light use efficiencies in blue and green light environments. From this work, we propose that advantages from CA4 may not be geared at direct competition with other Synechococcus specialists with fixed pigment types, but may serve to expand the ecological range of Synechococcus in spectral competition with other genera. As all eight Synechococcus strains tested had higher light use efficiency in green light, regardless of a fixed or flexible light harvesting strategy, we add evidence to the suitability of the Synechococcus genus to greener ocean niches, whether stable, or variable.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract