PurposeReports evaluating diagnosis and cross reactivity of quinolone hypersensitivity have revealed contradictory results. Furthermore, there are no reports investigating the cross-reactivity between gemifloxacin (GFX) and the others. We aimed to detect the usefulness of diagnostic tests of hypersensitivity reactions to quinolones and to evaluate the cross reactivity between different quinolones including the latest quinolone GFX.MethodsWe studied 54 patients (mean age 42.31±10.39 years; 47 female) with 57 hypersensitivity reactions due to different quinolones and 10 nonatopic quinolone tolerable control subjects. A detailed clinical history, skin test (ST), and single-blind placebo-controlled drug provocation test (SBPCDPT), as well as basophil activation test (BAT) and lymphocyte transformation test (LTT) were performed with the culprit and alternative quinolones including ciprofloxacin (CFX), moxifloxacin (MFX), levofloxacin (LFX), ofloxacin (OFX), and GFX.ResultsThe majority (75.9%) of the patients reported immediate type reactions to various quinolones. The most common culprit drug was CFX (52.6%) and the most common reaction type was urticaria (26.3%). A quarter of the patients (24.1%) reacted to SBPCDPTs, although their STs were negative; while false ST positivity was 3.5% and ST/SBPCDPTs concordance was only 1.8%. Both BAT and LTT were not found useful in quinolone hypersensitivity. Cross-reactivity was primarily observed between LFX and OFX (50.0%), whereas it was the least between MFX and the others, and in GFX hypersensitive patients the degree of cross-reactivity to the other quinolones was 16.7%.ConclusionsThese results suggest that STs, BAT, and LTT are not supportive in the diagnosis of a hypersensitivity reaction to quinolone as well as in the prediction of cross-reactivity. Drug provocation tests (DPTs) are necessary to identify both culprit and alternative quinolones.

No abstract

BackgroundEpidemiological studies show that immunoglobulin E (IgE) levels were higher in subjects with acute coronary events. However, it is unknown if the increased IgE level is a marker of future coronary incidents and whether it may be regarded as a risk factor of an ischemic heart disease.ObjectiveOur aim was to investigate the relationship between IgE levels and some atherosclerotic markers in patients without known atherosclerotic disease.MethodsFifty patients (mean age, 40.96 ± 10.8 years) with high serum IgE levels due to various conditions who did not display evidence of an atherosclerotic disease and 30 healthy control subjects (mean age, 47 ± 8.27 years) were included in the study. Atherosclerotic disease markers including adhesion molecules like vascular cell adhesion molecule-1, intercellular adhesion molecule-1, proinflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6, endothelin-1, and systemic inflammatory markers such as high sensitivity C-reactive protein were determined by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Endothelial functions of the coronary arteries were determined by coronary flow reserve (CFR) measurements and carotid intima media thickness using transthoracic Doppler echocardiography.ResultsCFR was significantly lower in the patient group when compared with the control group (p<0.001; 95% confidence interval, -0.79 to-0.20) while carotid media thicknesses were not different between 2 groups. There were no differences in ELISA test results between the 2 groups.ConclusionOur results showed that CFR as an early marker of endothelial dysfunction was significantly lower in patients with high IgE levels. This finding seems to support the role of IgE in the vascular pathology of atherosclerosis.

Background Hereditary angioedema (HAE) attacks can be provoked with psychological factors. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of anxiety, depression and stress related to COVID‐19 pandemic on disease activity of HAE patients during the quarantine period (QP) and the return to normal period (RTNP). Methods This study was conducted between March 2020 and September 2020 in four allergy centres. Demographic, clinical features and mental health status were evaluated in QP (from March to the beginning of June) and RTNP (from June to the beginning of September) applied by the government. The 10‐point visual analogue scale (VAS10) was used to define the severity of HAE attacks. Depression‐Anxiety‐ Stress Scale‐21 (DASS‐21) and Fear of COVID‐19 (FC‐19) scales were performed to assess mental health status. Results 139 HAE patients were included in the study. In QP, median attack numbers and median VAS10 scores were 5 (min‐max: 0‐45) and 6 (min‐max: 0‐10), respectively. HAE attack numbers, DASS‐21 stress, anxiety, depression and total DASS‐21 scores, as well as FC‐19 scores were higher in QP than RTNP (p=0.001, p<0.001, p=0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, p<0.001, respectively). However, there was no difference in attack severity scores between the two periods (p>0.05). Conclusions This study revealed that the restriction measures during COVID‐19 outbreak causes an increase in the number of HAE attacks in relation to anxiety, depression, stress and fear of COVID‐19 pandemic. Therefore, it is important to provide psychological support to HAE patients during the pandemic.

Aleukemic leukemia cutis (ALC), a discrete tumor of leukemic cells involving the skin, may be the first manifestation of acute myeloid leukemia, preceding the onset in marrow and blood by months and years. ALC is often difficult to diagnose and is associated with a dismal prognosis. A 63-year-old male presented with nodular swellings on the face, a plaque extending over the right shoulder and multiple enlarged cervical lymph nodes. The skin biopsy of the plaque lesion showed a diffuse neoplastic infiltration extending from the dermis to subcutaneous tissue with diffuse positivity for myeloperoxidase and focal positivity for CD34 on immunohistochemical staining. The diagnosis was leukemia cutis. One month later, acute monocytic leukemia (FAB AML-M5b) was diagnosed. The patient died on the seventh month of diagnosis.

Background: Although paucigranulocytic asthma (PGA) is the most common phenotype of stable asthma, its features have not been adequately studied. In this study, we aimed to display the characteristics of PGA. Method: A total of 116 non-smoking adult patients with asthma (80% women; mean ± standard deviation age, 39 ± 12.9 years) admitted to three tertiary centers were included. Their demographic and clinical features, allergy status, biochemical results, scores of Asthma Control Test (ACT), spirometry, and exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) measurements were obtained. Induced sputum cytometry was performed. Results: Four phenotypes, according to induced sputum cell counts, were detected: eosinophilic asthma (EA) (22.4%), mixed granulocytic asthma (MGA) (6.9%), neutrophilic (NA) (7.8%), and PGA (62.9%). In the sputum, macrophages were higher in the PGA group compared with the other groups (PGA versus NA and PGA versus MGA, p < 0.001; and PGA versus EA, p =0 .030). The atopy rate between phenotypes was the same. Although the forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) was similar in four groups, the ratio of FEV1 to the forced vital capacity ratio was higher (p = 0.013) and FEV1 reversibility was lower in the patients with PGA than the corresponding values in other phenotypes (p = 0.015). Low reversibility was comparable both in patients with PGA who were inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) naive and in patients on ICS treatment. Although insignificant, the FeNO values and blood eosinophil counts were higher in the MGA and EA groups, whereas these were the lowest in the PGA group. The uncontrolled asthma ratio was low in PGA (16%), whereas it was 11% for NA, 25% for MG, and 23% in EA. Conclusion: Macrophages are predominant in sputum of patients with PGA. Besides a lower uncontrolled asthma ratio, lower FEV1 reversibility is a prominent characteristic of this phenotype.

No abstract

Aim: To investigate the potential risk factors in patients who have experienced anaphylaxis from drugs. Method: The study included 281 adult patients (median age 40 years; 76.5% female) who experienced immediate types of hypersensitivity reaction to a drug. The patients were divided into an anaphylaxis group and a nonanaphylaxis group. The anaphylaxis group was diagnosed according to the criteria of the World Allergy Organization. Skin testing with culprit drugs was performed. In the nonanaphylaxis group, drug provocation tests were performed with culprit drugs, including aspirin or diclofenac, to determine nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) hypersensitivity. Atopy was determined by skin prick tests with the common inhalant allergens. Patients’ demographics, clinical features, and baseline tryptase and total IgE levels were compared between the 2 groups. Results: The median interval between the last reaction in the patient’s history and the study evaluation was 7 months (range 1–120 months). In 52.3% of the patients, reactions were defined as anaphylaxis. The most common culprit drugs were NSAIDs (56.9%) and β-lactams (34.7%). The culprit drugs were used parenterally in 13.2% of the patients. 34.9% of the patients had comorbid diseases and 24.6% used additional drugs, the most common being antihypertensives (10%). Atopy was determined in 28.8% and 28.1% of the patients were smokers. The median serum level of baseline tryptase and total IgE was 3.5 µg/L and 77 kU/L, respectively. In 46.3% of the patients, skin tests with culprit drugs were positive and the positivity ratio was higher in the anaphylaxis group (p = 0.002). Anapyhlaxis was more common in patients who were: hypertensive, atopic, using angio­tensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, and received the culprit drug parenterally (p = 0.034, p = 0.04, p = 0.03, p = 0.035, p = 0.013, and p < 0.001). In the multivariate analysis, it was observed that the parenteral usage of the drug and the presence of atopy were significantly higher in the anaphylaxis group (p < 0.001, odds ratio [OR] = 20.05, confidence interval [CI] 4.75–88.64; p = 0.012, OR = 2.1, CI 1.17–3.74). Age, smoking, family history, and serum levels of baseline tryptase and total IgE did not differ between groups. Conclusion: The parenteral route and atopy increase the risk of drug-induced anaphylaxis. IgE-mediated sensitivity to the culprit drug seems to facilitate anaphylaxis.