No abstract

The mechanism by which protein-coding portions of eukaryotic genes came to be separated by long non-coding stretches of DNA, and the purpose for this perplexing arrangement, have remained unresolved fundamental biological problems for three decades. We report here a plausible solution to this problem based on analysis of open reading frame (ORF) length constraints in the genomes of nine diverse species. If primordial nucleic acid sequences were random in sequence, functional proteins that are innately long would not be encoded due to the frequent occurrence of stop codons. The best possible way that a long protein-coding sequence could have been derived was by evolving a split-structure from the random DNA (or RNA) sequence. Results of the systematic analyses of nine complete genome sequences presented here suggests that perhaps the major underlying structural features of split-genes have evolved due to the indigenous occurrence of split protein-coding genes in primordial random nucleotide sequence. The results also suggest that intron-rich genes containing short exons may have been the original form of genes intrinsically occurring in random DNA, and that intron-poor genes containing long exons were perhaps derived from the original intron-rich genes.

The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate two different standing postures, intermittent walking (dynamic) and stationary, on 11 volunteers. While performing the activity in a stationary posture, volunteers worked barefoot for 25 minutes at a particular workstation, taking up to five passive breaks. The dynamic standing postural activity was similar in every respect with the exception of the nature of the breaks that were spent walking from one workstation to the other. Foot pressure was analyzed using a static evaluation variable (contact area) and a dynamic evaluation variable (area pressure change root mean square [aPcrms]). Foot center of pressure (COP) was analyzed using two of its features: excursion length (LEN) and root mean square velocity of excursions (VEL). In addition, a psychophysical study was used to distinguish the comfort levels of various muscles between the two postures. The quantifications of the four physiological variables revealed a lower comfort index (p < 0.05) in stationary standing compared to dynamic standing during assembling duties. This significant distinction was further corroborated by the results of the psychophysical test. Such a positive influence of the dynamic standing posture on standing comfort can be used to improve industrial productivity.

No abstract