Physics-based well performance modeling technology has been developed that establishes Well Operability Limits (WOLs) to mitigate well failures due to the complex geomechanical loads resulting from compacting reservoirs. This new technology assists in active reservoir management by both limiting the producing drawdown pressure on wells most susceptible to failure and providing confidence in increasing drawdown pressure on wells determined not to be susceptible. In 2000–2001, ExxonMobil experienced three unexpected reservoir compaction well failures during the start-up of the deepwater Diana/Hoover project in the Gulf of Mexico. This experience led to the development of advanced well performance modeling technology which was used to assess ExxonMobil's worldwide portfolio for potential compaction related well failures. WOLs have now successfully been used to manage nearly 100 deepwater wells without failure since 2001 and are actively used to establish completion and production strategies for wells in many other types of producing assets worldwide. Implementation of this technology has not only prevented well failures and associated production disruption due to reservoir compaction, but also enabled safe increases in well drawdown and accompanying increases in production rates beyond previous industry experience. This paper focuses on the application of WOL technology to ExxonMobil deepwater wells. The general methodology and development of the reservoir compaction WOL technology will be introduced. Selected case studies will highlight the successful application of the technology as well as illustrate the operating strategies and the subsequent production benefits. WOL technology has significantly improved ExxonMobil's ability to operate wells without incurring costly well failures by more clearly defining the complex limits of compacting reservoirs. Background Ensuring long-term well integrity and optimum completion performance is important for the economic development of any field. As fields are developed with fewer wells and in more technically challenging environments, analysis is required to deliver reliable wells that can be operated at the high rates required to meet today's aggressive production targets. Long-term well integrity is essential for commercial deepwater field development. Operators cannot rely on historical industry practices based on aggregate historical data, anecdotal evidence, and simplified analytical models to prevent well failures while simultaneously maximizing well production and reservoir recovery. This is especially true in deepwater environments, where reservoir characteristics are significantly different than in the fields that serve as the basis for historical practices and the cost of well intervention to recover from a failure is substantial. Well failures due to compaction and subsidence have been experienced for decades in various environments and are summarized briefly below:Wilmington Field - One of the first ExxonMobil experiences with subsidence occurred at the Wilmington field located onshore California. Production began in 1936, and 7 feet of subsidence occurred by 1947, the time of the earliest casing failures. Horizontal movements of 9 inches were documented in three weak shale layers above the producing reservoir (Allen, 1959).
South Diana is a single-well gas condensate field in the deepwater Gulf of Mexico (GOM). The reservoir consists of turbidite unconsolidated sands separated by thin shales. Geomechanical characterization of South Diana core revealed high rock compressibility and potential for compaction- induced permeability reduction. This paper discusses various modeling studies conducted prior to field startup to assess the impact of rock compaction on well integrity and producibility. Geomechanical models, reservoir simulation studies, and core measurements were used to develop physics-based integrated well performance technical limits. These technical limits have been used to successfully manage rock compaction related risks to well integrity and producibility. Reservoir surveillance data and comparison with model predictions are discussed. Reservoir management issues and insights gained from field data for this compacting deepwater reservoir are also discussed. Introduction As offshore developments trend toward fewer wells with high per-well production volumes and rates, new technologies are required to ensure long-term mechanical integrity and optimum producibility of wells. An example of one such development is the South Diana single-well satellite gas field in deepwater GOM. The field was developed through an 8-mile subsea well tie back to existing infrastructure in the Diana Basin (4400-ft water depth). The reservoir consists of several high quality distal turbidite unconsolidated sands separated by thin shales. At the time of field development, key geologic uncertainties included connectivity across the reservoir area and sand thickness away from existing well control. Natural depletion with moderate water-drive is the expected depletion mechanism. Cores and fluid samples were obtained from the discovery well and a sidetrack well. Geomechanical characterization of South Diana core revealed high rock compressibility with depletion and potential for compaction-induced permeability reduction. Pressure transient analysis from offset ExxonMobil operated reservoirs (Diana, Hoover, Marshall, Madison) within the Diana basin has confirmed reservoir-wide compaction. These analyses have shown reductions of up to 80% of the original flow capacity (Kh) for several wells. The quantitative impact of compaction could not be predicted directly from laboratory measurements on cores for a number of reasons including differences in stress paths between experimental and actual reservoir depletion. Similar compaction induced reduction of Kh has been documented by other GOM operators.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.