Recent widespread concern has led to legislation in the UK preventing the use of fetal ovarian tissue for the treatment of infertile women. This questionnaire-based study aimed to assess the attitudes of both fertile and infertile men and women as well as egg donors and recipients towards the use of donated eggs for treatment, diagnosis and research. Fertile individuals were significantly less aware of egg donation but the majority in both the fertile and the infertile groups approved the use of eggs for research (89 and 95% of women and 88 and 92% of men respectively) and treatment (similar percentages). However, fetal sources of oocytes were acceptable to only 15% of women in the fertile, 21% in the infertile, 35% in the recipient and 19% in the donor groups. Cadaveric sources of oocytes were slightly more acceptable (28% fertile, 28% infertile, 50% recipient and 42% donors). Both these sources of oocytes were slightly more acceptable to men. Education had little influence on attitudes, although men and women of tertiary education level said they would be less likely to have gamete donation themselves. Thus there would appear to be widespread approval for the use of donor eggs in research and treatment but not if the source of eggs is fetal or cadaveric.

Mifepristone interrupts folliculogenesis in women but the mechanism is not clear. Previous studies have investigated the effect of this compound on gonadotrophin secretion and have provided conflicting results. To study further the effect of mifepristone on basal and gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH)-induced gonadotrophin secretion, 12 normally ovulating women were investigated during two consecutive menstrual cycles, comprising an untreated cycle (control) and a cycle treated with mifepristone. All women were treated with mifepristone on days 2-8 at the dose of 100 mg (group 1, eight women) or 10 mg per day (group 2, six women). Two women were treated with both regimens in two different cycles. On day 8 of both cycles, the women received two GnRH pulses of 10 micrograms each 2 h apart. Blood samples in relation to the first GnRH pulse were taken at-15, 0, 30, 60, 120, 150, 180 and 240 min. In group 1, the increase in luteinizing hormone (delta LH) in response to GnRH was significantly attenuated from 30 to 180 min, while the increase in follicle stimulating hormone (delta FSH) was attenuated only in response to the second GnRH pulse. No significant decrease in delta LH and delta FSH response to GnRH was seen during treatment with the 10 mg dose (group 2). In group 1, serum oestradiol and inhibin-A concentrations after day 8 were lower than in the control cycles and the LH peak was postponed by 7 days on average. Basal LH values increased significantly on day 8 in both groups, while FSH values did not change significantly compared with the control cycles. A significant increase in serum progesterone and cortisol values occurred during the treatment only in group 1. Mid-luteal values of inhibin-A were significantly lower in cycles treated with 100 mg mifepristone than in the control cycles. We conclude that the disruption of folliculogenesis by mifepristone cannot be explained by a decrease in basal FSH concentrations during the critical period of follicle recruitment and selection. It is possible that mifepristone exerts its effect at the level of the ovary. It is also suggested that progesterone during the follicular phase of the cycle may participate in the control of the self-priming action of GnRH on the pituitary.

STUDY QUESTION What is the association between serum progesterone levels on the day of frozen embryo transfer (FET) and the probability of live birth in women undergoing different FET regimens? SUMMARY ANSWER Overall, serum progesterone levels <7.8 ng/ml were associated with reduced odds of live birth, although the association between serum progesterone levels and the probability of live birth appeared to vary according to the route of progesterone administration. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Progesterone is essential for pregnancy success. A recent systematic review showed that in FET cycles using vaginal progesterone for endometrial preparation, lower serum progesterone levels (<10 ng/ml) were associated with a reduction in live birth rates and higher chance of miscarriage. However, there was uncertainty about the association between serum progesterone levels and treatment outcomes in natural cycle FET (NC-FET) and hormone replacement therapy FET (HRT-FET) using non-vaginal routes of progesterone administration. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This was a multicentre (n = 8) prospective cohort study conducted in the United Kingdom between January 2020 and February 2021. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS We included women having NC-FET or HRT-FET treatment with progesterone administration by any available route. Women underwent venepuncture on the day of embryo transfer. Participants and clinical personnel were blinded to the serum progesterone levels. We conducted unadjusted and multivariable logistic regression analyses to investigate the association between serum progesterone levels on the day of FET and treatment outcomes according to the type of cycle and route of exogenous progesterone administration. Our primary outcome was the live birth rate per participant. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE We studied a total of 402 women. The mean (standard deviation) serum progesterone level was 14.9 (7.5) ng/ml. Overall, the mean adjusted probability of live birth increased non-linearly from 37.6% (95% confidence interval [CI] 26.3%-48.9%) to 45.5% (95% CI 32.1%-58.9%) as serum progesterone rose between the 10th (7.8 ng/ml) and 90th (24.0 ng/ml) centiles. In comparison to participants whose serum progesterone level was ≥7.8 ng/ml, those with lower progesterone (<7.8 ng/ml, 10th centile) experienced fewer live births (28.2% versus 40.0%, adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.41, 95% CI 0.18-0.91, P = 0.028), lower odds of clinical pregnancy (30.8% versus 45.1%, aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.16-0.79, P = 0.011) and a trend towards increased odds of miscarriage (42.1% versus 28.7%, aOR 2.58, 95% CI 0.88-7.62, P = 0.086). In women receiving vaginal progesterone, the mean adjusted probability of live birth increased as serum progesterone levels rose, whereas women having exclusively subcutaneous progesterone experienced a reduction in the mean probability of live birth as progesterone levels rose beyond 16.3 ng/ml. The combination of vaginal and subcutaneous routes appeared to exert little impact upon the mean probability of live birth in relation to serum progesterone levels. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION The final sample size was smaller than originally planned, although our study was adequately powered to confidently identify a difference in live birth between optimal and inadequate progesterone levels. Further, our cohort did not include women receiving oral or rectal progestogens. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS Our results corroborate existing evidence suggesting that lower serum progesterone levels hinder FET success. However, the relationship between serum progesterone and the probability of live birth appears to be non-linear in women receiving exclusively subcutaneous progesterone, suggesting that in this subgroup of women, high serum progesterone may also be detrimental to treatment success. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS This work was supported by CARE Fertility and a doctoral research fellowship (awarded to P.M.) by the Tommy’s Charity and the University of Birmingham. M.J.P. is supported by the NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre. S.F. is a minor shareholder of CARE Fertility, but has no financial or other interest with progesterone testing or manufacturing companies. P.L. reports personal fees from Pharmasure, outside the submitted work. G.P. reports personal fees from Besins Healthcare, outside the submitted work. M.W. reports personal fees from Ferring Pharmaceuticals, outside the submitted work. The remaining authors have no conflict of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04170517

Thrombophilia and impaired placental vasculature are a major cause of adverse pregnancy outcome. In 2007, a new hereditary factor for obstetric complications and recurrent pregnancy loss (RPL) was identified as a sequence variation in the core promoter of the annexin A5 gene, ANXA5, called the M2 haplotype. M2 carriership has been demonstrated in couples with recurrent miscarriage and its origin is embryonic rather than specifically maternal, confirmed by subsequent papers. The M2 haplotype is the first report of a hereditary factor related to pregnancy pathology caused by embryonic-induced anticoagulation. It has been demonstrated that couples with RPL had equal and significantly increased M2 carriership and that maternal and paternal carriership confers equal risk. Given its importance for patients with RPL, and potentially implantation failure, this study assessed the incidence of carrier status for the M2 ANXA5 haplotype in both the male and female of couples attending five CARE IVF centres. In 314 patients (157 couples), 44% of couples (one or both partners), 24% of females, 26% of males and 37% of couples with unexplained infertility were M2 carriers. This high incidence has provoked further urgent studies on specific patient populations and on the value of post embryo-transfer therapy.

BackgroundPregnancy failure and placenta mediated pregnancy complications affect > 25% of pregnancies. Although there is biological plausibility for a procoagulant mechanism underlying some of these events, antithrombotic intervention trials demonstrate limited benefit, possibly through lack of stratification in heterogeneous patient groups. The ANXA5 M2 haplotype is a possible procoagulant biomarker and was tested pragmatically to determine whether this screening and LMWH treatment normalized the outcome for ANXA5 M2 positive couples.This was a pragmatic study that aimed to measure the effectiveness of a testing (for the M2 haplotype) and treatment (LMWH) pathway in routine clinical practice where there is variation between patients. Such a study in couples with fertility problems can inform choices between treatments; it is then the management protocol which is the subject of the investigation, not the individual treatments.MethodsCouples (N = 77) with one or both partners ANXA5 M2 positive demonstrated association of this haplotype with adverse IVF outcome. A pragmatic, multicenter, prospective cohort study of ANXA5 M2 haplotype screening, and LWMH treatment following embryo transfer (ET) in 103 IVF couples positive for ANXA5 M2 was performed. They were compared with a group of 1000 contemporaneous randomly selected unscreened and untreated couples undergoing assisted conception, from which 103 matched control couples were derived. The primary outcome measure was live birth incidence. Secondary outcomes were results following embryo transfer (ET) and live birth outcome by gender and M2 carriage, and allelic dose influence.FindingsThe tested and treated cohort of ANXA5 M2 carriers achieved a similar live birth rate (37.9%) per ET cycle compared to both the more fertile comparison group (38.5%), and to the 103 matched controls (33.0%). Significantly more treated male carrier only couples had a live birth versus female M2 only (47.7% vs. 25.0% p = 0.045).InterpretationPragmatic ANXA5 M5 screening and treatment with LMWH in couples undergoing IVF is associated with similar outcome to couples with more favorable prognostic factors. The difference in live birth outcome for treated male only carrier couples may be consistent with an additional maternal thrombophilic factor that may adversely affect pregnancy, although other mechanisms are possible. This study suggests that LMWH treatment should be started prior to clinical pregnancy.

Background: Pregnancy failure and placenta mediated pregnancy complications affect N 25% of pregnancies. Although there is biological plausibility for a procoagulant mechanism underlying some of these events, antithrombotic intervention trials demonstrate limited benefit, possibly through lack of stratification in heterogeneous patient groups. The ANXA5 M2 haplotype is a possible procoagulant biomarker and was tested pragmatically to determine whether this screening and LMWH treatment normalized the outcome for ANXA5 M2 positive couples. This was a pragmatic study that aimed to measure the effectiveness of a testing (for the M2 haplotype) and treatment (LMWH) pathway in routine clinical practice where there is variation between patients. Such a study in couples with fertility problems can inform choices between treatments; it is then the management protocol which is the subject of the investigation, not the individual treatments. Methods: Couples (N = 77) with one or both partners ANXA5 M2 positive demonstrated association of this haplotype with adverse IVF outcome. A pragmatic, multicenter, prospective cohort study of ANXA5 M2 haplotype screening, and LWMH treatment following embryo transfer (ET) in 103 IVF couples positive for ANXA5 M2 was performed. They were compared with a group of 1000 contemporaneous randomly selected unscreened and untreated couples undergoing assisted conception, from which 103 matched control couples were derived. The primary outcome measure was live birth incidence. Secondary outcomes were results following embryo transfer (ET) and live birth outcome by gender and M2 carriage, and allelic dose influence. Findings: The tested and treated cohort of ANXA5 M2 carriers achieved a similar live birth rate (37.9%) per ET cycle compared to both the more fertile comparison group (38.5%), and to the 103 matched controls (33.0%). Significantly more treated male carrier only couples had a live birth versus female M2 only (47.7% vs. 25.0% p = 0.045). Interpretation: Pragmatic ANXA5 M5 screening and treatment with LMWH in couples undergoing IVF is associated with similar outcome to couples with more favorable prognostic factors. The difference in live birth outcome for treated male only carrier couples may be consistent with an additional maternal thrombophilic factor that may adversely affect pregnancy, although other mechanisms are possible. This study suggests that LMWH treatment should be started prior to clinical pregnancy.

These results suggest that mifepristone arrests follicular development at a stage beyond the recruitment-selection point by delaying the growth of the dominant follicle. This is probably achieved through an effect of mifepristone on the ovary where it reduces the sensitivity of the selected follicle to FSH. Mifepristone may have a potential application for the inhibition of the LH surge in superovulation induction programmes.

Findings paragraph) of this article, whereby the 47.7% for male ANXA5 M2 only should have been 58.3%, as is in Table 5 and in Results section of the article.The correct Findings paragraph of the Abstract should read as follows: Findings The tested and treated cohort of ANXA5 M2 carriers achieved a similar live birth rate (37.9%) per ET cycle compared to both the more fertile comparison group (38.5%), and to the 103 matched controls (33.0%). Significantly more treated male carrier only couples had a live birth versus female M2 only (58.3% vs. 25.0% p = 0.045).