The Unilink system, a mechanical anastomotic device, was compared with standard suture techniques in terms of anastomotic strength under conditions of uniaxial loading. Twenty-five rabbits underwent Unilink and suture anastomosis of both carotid arteries and facial veins. Animals were sacrificed at 1 hour (five animals), 2 weeks (10 animals), and 16 weeks (10 animals), and all vessels were tested by constant loading in a material testing machine. The maximum load required to disrupt the anastomosis as well as the site of vessel failure were recorded. All 100 anastomoses were fully patent as evaluated by clinical testing. At 1 hour and 2 weeks, the Unilink arterial anastomoses were consistently and significantly stronger than the sutured anastomoses. At 16 weeks the sutured arterial anastomoses were significantly stronger than Unilink. The Unilink anastomoses, however, remained approximately 50% stronger than unoperated normal vessels. No statistical differences were observed in the strength of venous anastomoses at any of the intervals tested. There were no statistical differences in the sites of failure of the vessels under loading (i.e., at the anastomosis or proximal or distal to it) between the two techniques.

The Unilink/3M Precise anastomotic device for microvascular anastomoses has been evaluated in 38 critical anastomoses in 26 selected patients. The microvascular anastomosis was usually completed within three minutes by a single surgeon. There was only one failure, when an arterial anastomosis clotted because of a technical error. In all patients tissue survival was dependent on patent mechanical anastomoses (critical anastomoses) and the follow-up period was more than three years.

No abstract

Vein segments from the posterior facial vein of the rabbit were surgically isolated and re-anastomosed, either by manual suture technique or by the use of a new mechanical anastomotic device, the UNILINK apparatus. The purpose of the study was to compare anastomotic patency and time required for an orthotopic vein grafting procedure, when the two techniques were used. In the grafts anastomosed with the UNILINK technique, both clinical and histological evaluation showed 100% patency, while 20% of the sutured grafts showed impaired flow as a result of occlusive thrombosis. When the mechanical device was used, the full procedure was completed within one third of the time, as compared to suture anastomoses.

No abstract