No abstract

Objective: To assess if the percentage of cancer in prostate needle biopsies provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and/or biochemical relapse after radical prostatectomy. Methods: One hundred and forty prostate cancer patients who underwent radical prostatectomy were evaluated. Preoperative parameters analyzed were patient age, PSA, clinical stage, and the information obtained from sextant biopsies (Gleason score, maximum percentage of cancer in a core, percentage of tissue with cancer in all biopsies and the number of cores positive for cancer). Univariate and multivariate analyses (logistic regression) for the dependent variables (prostate cancer, organ-confined and biochemical relapse) were performed. Results: The tumor was organ-confined in 73.6% of patients. In those patients studied for disease progression (n = 126), no biochemical recurrence was observed in 76.2%. In the multivariate analysis for organ-confined disease, the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level, the Gleason score and the clinical stage were the most accurate predictive factors of pathological stage. The multivariate analysis for the study of biochemical failure indicated that only the total percentage of biopsy tissue with cancer, the preoperative PSA level and the Gleason score were independent predictive factors. According to the logistic regression analysis for disease recurrence, 3 risk groups could be identified: low risk (less than 10% probability of disease progression), intermediate risk (30%) and high risk (more than 70%). Conclusions: The percentage of cancer in prostate biopsy provides independent prognostic information for predicting pathological stage and the risk of biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy.

No abstract

Aim: We evaluate the prevalence of erectile dysfunction (ED) prior to surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and changes produced after surgical intervention. Patients and Methods: This prospective study included 128 patients treated surgically for BPH. The prevalence of ED was determined before and after surgery according to the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF). The influence of different clinical variables on erectile function (EF) improvement or deterioration after surgery was determined using uni- and multivariate analyses. Results: Mean IIEF score before surgery was 20.5 ± 7.6. Overall, ED was absent in 32% of patients, mild in 42%, moderate in 13.3%, and severe in 12.5%. Mean IIEF score following surgery was 21.5 ± 7.4 (p = n.s.). After surgery EF improved in 26.6% (34/128) of patients and worsened in 18.8% (24/128) (p < 0.05). Analysing the subset of patients with presurgical ED, 39% reported improvement and 21.1% reported worsening of EF postoperatively. None of the variables analyzed showed a significant relationship with improvement or worsening of EF. Only age was related to worsening EF in the subgroup of non-ED patients. Conclusions: There is a high prevalence of ED amongst candidates for BPH surgery. Although the risk of worsening EF exists postsurgically, an important percentage of ED patients will improve.

No abstract