Some new cases of ectoparasitoid wasps from the Polysphincta genus-group manipulating the behaviour of host spiders have been described in recent years, indicating that the modification of normal web structure is the rule rather than an exception as the outcome of these interactions. In most cases, orb web diameter and the number of adhesive spirals are reduced, which decreases the probability of web damage from the interception of insects on the viscid threads during the development of the parasitoid within the cocoon. In this study, we describe a new interaction between the host spider Leucauge volupis and the recently described parasitoid Hymenoepimecis jordanensis. Web modifications induced by larvae in their last instar, in this case, are different to those described for two other Leucauge species attacked by Hymenoepimecis spp., L. argyra and L. roseosignatha. The cocoon webs constructed by the parasitized L. volupis are similar to those webs constructed by immature individuals, presenting a lower tangle, which may increase the stability of the web or offer additional physical protection for the cocoon. As in other previously described cases, sticky spirals are absent from cocoon webs. However, the photographs of webs constructed by spiders carrying second instar larvae indicated that the reduction in spirals begins before the construction of the cocoon web. These webs remain functional, being substantially modified only when the larvae reach the third instar. Variation among cocoon web designs of congeneric hosts attacked by distinct Hymenoepimecis species indicate that the substance used for host manipulation may vary in concentration and/or composition. Alternatively, distinct host responses may occur to the same substances.

No abstract

Males should be more selective when they have a high investment in reproduction, especially in species with biparental or paternal care. In this context, male mate choice can promote size-assortative mating (SAM) when (1) large males win intrasexual disputes, (2) large females are more fecund, and (3) males prefer larger females to smaller ones. In the spider Manogea porracea, males exhibit high reproductive investment by building their webs above those of females and exhibiting extended care of offspring in the absence of females. Under these circumstances, we expect the occurrence of SAM and male preference for large females. Herein, we performed observations and experiments in the field to evaluate the hypotheses that (1) M. porracea mates assortatively by size and (2) SAM is influenced by male mate choice. Furthermore, we measured variables that could affect mating patterns, the sex ratios, and densities of both sexes. Pairing in M. porracea was positively size-assortative in 2012, but not in 2013. Large males won most disputes for mates and preferred larger females, which produced more eggs. The inconsistency in detection of SAM was due to population dynamics, namely variations in sex ratio and population density across the breeding season. Furthermore, we found that the significance of male mate choice on sexual selection of body size in M. porracea strongly depends on the competition intensity for mating opportunities. The traditional sexual selection hypothesis of SAM needs to be reviewed and must include measures of competition intensity.

Despite the important roles of assortative mating for understanding evolutionary processes, our knowledge on the variation in assortative mating across populations and breeding periods has been overshadowed by the greater attention given to general patterns. Obtaining data on mating pairs are difficult for most species; therefore, researchers often group data from different populations or breeding periods, which can increase positive biases in detecting and estimating assortative mating. We used a meta‐analytic approach to investigate the biases caused by spatially or temporally pooling data and the assortative mating consistency across populations and breeding periods. We describe assortative mating patterns across and within animal taxa. We performed a systematic review to search studies reporting measures of size‐assortative mating (SAM). Grouping data from multiple populations and seasons incurred positive biases. Overall, assortative mating moderately exhibited low repeatability in space and time, but it was inconsistent for most taxa. After excluding pooled measures, the average estimate for assortative mating was moderate and positive. Thus, our findings demonstrate that pooling data can produce misleading results. We also highlight the importance of further investigation of hypotheses that explain spatial and temporal variation in assortative mating, after its detection. Our study reinforces the significance of investigating mating patterns at various spatial and temporal scales before drawing broad conclusions.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

Individual nutritional status may increase marginal foraging costs and potentially drive animal foraging strategies. Here, we investigated how it might affect foraging strategies of the shelter-building spider Hingstepeira folisecens (Hingston 1932) (Araneidae). This spider can catch prey using two strategies with different relative costs: 'pulling' (higher energy expenditure) and 'pursuing' (lower energy expenditure). We conducted experiments by offering prey at a fixed distance from the shelter entrance to investigate if spiders with lower nutritional status would exhibit riskier but less costly foraging behaviours more frequently than spiders with better status. The nutritional status did not affect the foraging behaviours adopted by H. folisecens. Additionally, the frequency of both foraging behaviours was similar. Therefore, our results did not provide any evidence that individual nutritional status is a factor driving the selection of foraging behaviours in H. folisecens. We suggest that the malnourished spiders should adopt additional strategies to compensate for the costs of pulling behaviour, especially when prey is far from the shelter. Furthermore, it is possible that other factors, like relative prey size in relation to web size, can help us to understand the threshold that determines when such individuals must adopt one of two possible behaviours.