No abstract

In hemodialysis patients, C-reactive protein (CRP), an acute-phase reactant, is a sensitive and independent marker of malnutrition, anemia, and amyloidosis. The aim of the present studies was to evaluate CRP and interleukin 6 levels in plasma samples from long-term hemodialysis patients on different extracorporeal modalities associated with or without backfiltration. Two hundred and forty-seven patients were recruited in eight hospital-based centers. All patients had been on their dialytic modality for at least 6 months. At enrollment, 46 hemodialysis patients out of 247 (18.6%) had clinical evidence of pathologies known to be associated with high CRP values. The 201 remaining patients were defined as clinically stable and were on conventional hemodialysis (34%), hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes <10 liters/session (10%), hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes <20 liters/session (32%), and double-chamber hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes <10 liters/session (22%). Analysis of CRP values in the clinically stable patients showed that an unexpectedly high proportion (47%) of the patients had CRP values higher than 5 mg/l (taken as the upper limit in normal human subjects). The values of CRP and interleukin 6 were significantly higher in hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes <10 liters/session than in hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes >20 liters/session, in hemodialysis and in double-chamber hemodiafiltration. The same pattern occurred after 6 months of follow-up in 171 out of 201 clinically stable patients. Hemodialytic conditions that expose to the risk of backfiltration such as low exchange volume hemodiafiltration may induce a chronic inflammatory state as reflected by increased plasma values of both CRP and interleukin 6, thus suggesting the need for hemodialytic strategies that reduce (hemodialysis with low-permeability membranes or hemodiafiltration with infusion volumes >20 liters) or eliminate (double-chamber hemodiafiltration) backfiltration of bacteria-derived contaminants.

Objective The recent increase in the use of automated peritoneal dialysis (APD) has led to concerns about the adequacy of clearances delivered by this modality. Few clinical studies looking at the effects of varying the individual components of the APD prescription on delivered clearance have been done, and most published data are derived from computer modeling. Most controversial is the optimal frequency of exchanges per APD session. Many centers prescribe 4 to 6 cycles per night but it is unclear if this is optimal. The purpose of this study was to address at what point the beneficial effect of more frequent cycles is outweighed by the concomitant increase in the proportion of the total cycling time spent draining and filling. Methods A comparison was made between the urea and creatinine clearances (CCrs) achieved by 4 different APD prescriptions, used for 7 days each, in 18 patients. The prescriptions were for 9 hours each and were all based on 2-L dwell volumes, but differed in the frequency of exchanges. They were 5 x 2 L, 7 x 2 L, and 9 x 2 L, as well as a 50% tidal peritoneal dialysis (TPD) prescription using 14 L. Ultrafiltration, dwell time, glucose absorption, sodium and potassium removal, protein excretion, and relative cost were also compared. Clearances due to day dwells and residual renal function were not included in the calculation. Results Mean urea clearances were 7.5, 8.6, 9.1, and 8.3 L/night for the four prescriptions respectively. Urea clearance with 9 x 2 L was significantly greater than with the other three prescriptions ( p < 0 0.05). Urea clearance with 7 x 2 L and TPD were superior to 5 x 2 L ( p < 0.05). Mean CCr was 5.1, 6.1, 6.4, and 5.6 L/night, respectively. Compared to 5 x 2-L, the 7 x 2-L, 9 x 2-L, and TPD prescriptions achieved greater CCr ( p < 0.05). Taking both urea and CCr into account, 9 x 2 L was the optimal prescription in 12 of the 18 patients. Ultrafiltration and sodium and potassium removals were all significantly greater with the higher frequency prescriptions. Conclusion The 5 x 2-L prescription significantly underutilizes the potential of APD to deliver high clearances, and 7 x 2 L is a consistently superior prescription if 2-L dwells are being used. Although more costly, 9 x 2 L should be considered if higher clearances are required.