Summary Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are helical repeat proteins that bind RNA and influence gene expression in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Several PPR proteins in plants harbor a carboxy-terminal Small-MutS-Related (SMR) domain, but functions of the SMR appendage are unknown. To address this issue, we studied a maize PPR-SMR protein denoted PPR53 (GRMZM2G438524), which is orthologous to the Arabidopsis protein SOT1 (AT5G46580). Null ppr53 alleles condition a chlorotic, seedling lethal phenotype and a reduction in plastid ribosome content. Plastome-wide transcriptome and translatome analyses revealed strong defects in the expression of the ndhA and rrn23 genes, which were superimposed on secondary effects resulting from a decrease in plastid ribosome content. Transcripts with processed 5′-ends mapping approximately 70-nt upstream of rrn23 and ndhA are absent in ppr53 mutants, and the translational efficiency of the residual ndhA mRNAs is reduced. Recombinant PPR53 binds with high affinity and specificity to the 5′ proximal region of the PPR53-dependent 23S rRNA, suggesting that PPR53 protects this RNA via a barrier mechanism similar to that described for several PPR proteins lacking SMR motifs. However, recombinant PPR53 did not bind with high affinity to the ndhA 5′ UTR, suggesting that PPR53’s RNA stabilization and translation enhancing effects at the ndhA locus involve the participation of other factors.
Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are a large family of helical-repeat proteins that bind RNA in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Precise RNA targets and functions have been assigned to only a small fraction of the >400 members of the PPR family in plants. We used the amino acid code governing the specificity of RNA binding by PPR repeats to infer candidate-binding sites for the maize protein PPR103 and its ortholog Arabidopsis EMB175. Genetic and biochemical data confirmed a predicted binding site in the chloroplast rpl16 5′UTR to be a site of PPR103 action. This site maps to the 5′ end of transcripts that fail to accumulate in ppr103 mutants. A small RNA corresponding to the predicted PPR103 binding site accumulates in a PPR103-dependent fashion, as expected of PPR103's in vivo footprint. Recombinant PPR103 bound specifically to this sequence in vitro. These observations imply that PPR103 stabilizes rpl16 mRNA by impeding 5′→3′ RNA degradation. Previously described PPR proteins with this type of function consist of canonical PPR motifs. By contrast, PPR103 is a PLS-type protein, an architecture typically associated with proteins that specify sites of RNA editing. However, PPR103 is not required to specify editing sites in chloroplasts.
Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins comprise a large family of helical repeat proteins that influence gene expression in mitochondria and chloroplasts. PPR tracts can bind RNA via a modular one repeat-one nucleotide mechanism in which the nucleotide is specified by the identities of several amino acids in each repeat. This mode of recognition, the so-called PPR code, offers opportunities for the prediction of native PPR binding sites and the design of proteins to bind specified RNAs However, a deep understanding of the parameters that dictate the affinity and specificity of PPR-RNA interactions is necessary to realize these goals. We report a comprehensive analysis of the sequence specificity of PPR10, a protein that binds similar RNA sequences of ∼18 nucleotides (nt) near the chloroplast and genes in maize. We assessed the contribution of each nucleotide in the binding site to PPR10 affinity in vitro by analyzing the effects of single-nucleotide changes at each position. In a complementary approach, the RNAs bound by PPR10 from partially randomized RNA pools were analyzed by deep sequencing. The results revealed three patches in which nucleotide identity has a major impact on binding affinity. These include 5 nt for which protein contacts were not observed in a PPR10-RNA crystal structure and 4 nt that are not explained by current views of the PPR code. These findings highlight aspects of PPR-RNA interactions that pose challenges for binding site prediction and design.
Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are a large family of helical repeat proteins that bind RNA in mitochondria and chloroplasts. Sites of PPR action have been inferred primarily from genetic data, which have led to the view that most PPR proteins act at a very small number of sites in vivo. Here, we report new functions for three chloroplast PPR proteins that had already been studied in depth. Maize PPR5, previously shown to promote trnG splicing, is also required for rpl16 splicing. Maize PPR10, previously shown to bind the atpI-atpH and psaJ-rpl33 intercistronic regions, also stabilizes a 3′-end downstream from psaI. Arabidopsis PGR3, shown previously to bind upstream of petL, also binds the rpl14-rps8 intercistronic region where it stabilizes a 3′-end and stimulates rps8 translation. These functions of PGR3 are conserved in maize. The discovery of new functions for three proteins that were already among the best characterized members of the PPR family implies that functional repertoires of PPR proteins are more complex than have been appreciated. The diversity of sequences bound by PPR10 and PGR3 in vivo highlights challenges of predicting binding sites of native PPR proteins based on the amino acid code for nucleotide recognition by PPR motifs.
Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) proteins are helical-repeat proteins that offer a promising scaffold for the engineering of proteins to bind specified RNAs. PPR tracts bind RNA in a modular 1-repeat, 1-nucleotide fashion. An amino acid code specifying the bound nucleotide has been elucidated. However, this code does not fully explain the sequence specificity of native PPR proteins. Furthermore, it does not address nuances such as the contribution toward binding affinity of various repeat-nucleotide pairs or the impact of mismatches between a repeat and aligning nucleotide. We used an in vitro bind-n-seq approach to describe the population of sequences bound by four artificial PPR proteins built from consensus scaffolds. The specificity of these proteins can be accounted for by canonical code-based nucleotide recognition. The results show, however, that interactions near the 3′-end of binding sites make less contribution to binding affinity than do those near the 5′-end, that proteins with 11 and 14 repeats exhibit similar affinity for their intended targets but 14-repeats are more permissive for mismatches, and that purine-binding repeats are less tolerant of transversion mismatches than are pyrimidine-binding motifs. These findings have implications for mechanisms that establish PPR–RNA interactions and for optimizing PPR design to minimize off-target interactions.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.