Drosophila neural stem cells, or neuroblasts, ingress from the neuroepithelium in an EMT-like process, during which the apical cell domain is lost. Apical constriction of neuroblasts and the serial loss of cell–cell contacts require periodic pulses of actomyosin that cause progressively stronger ratcheted contractions of the neuroblast apical cortex.

Germline stem cells in the Drosophila ovary are maintained by a somatic niche. The niche is structurally and functionally complex and contains four cell types, the escort, cap, and terminal filament cells and the newly identified transition cell. We find that the large Maf transcription factor Traffic jam (Tj) is essential for determining niche cell fates and architecture, enabling each niche in the ovary to support a normal complement of 2–3 germline stem cells. In particular, we focused on the question of how cap cells form. Cap cells express Tj and are considered the key component of a mature germline stem cell niche. We conclude that Tj controls the specification of cap cells, as the complete loss of Tj function caused the development of additional terminal filament cells at the expense of cap cells, and terminal filament cells developed cap cell characteristics when induced to express Tj. Further, we propose that Tj controls the morphogenetic behavior of cap cells as they adopted the shape and spatial organization of terminal filament cells but otherwise appeared to retain their fate when Tj expression was only partially reduced. Our data indicate that Tj contributes to the establishment of germline stem cells by promoting the cap cell fate, and controls the stem cell-carrying capacity of the niche by regulating niche architecture. Analysis of the interactions between Tj and the Notch (N) pathway indicates that Tj and N have distinct functions in the cap cell specification program. We propose that formation of cap cells depends on the combined activities of Tj and the N pathway, with Tj promoting the cap cell fate by blocking the terminal filament cell fate, and N supporting cap cells by preventing the escort cell fate and/or controlling the number of cap cell precursors.

No abstract

Ehlers–Danlos syndrome (EDS) is a heterogeneous group of connective tissue disorders characterized by hyperextensible skin, hypermobile joints, easy bruisability, and fragility of the connective tissues. The diagnosis is based on clinical assessment and phenotype‐guided genetic testing. Most EDS subtypes can be confirmed by genetic testing except for hypermobile EDS. This study explored the utility of applying the 2017 EDS classification criteria and molecular genetic testing in establishing an EDS diagnosis in children. In this retrospective study, we reviewed 72 patients referred to a tertiary care center for evaluation of EDS who underwent one or more forms of genetic testing. Eighteen patients (18/72, 25%) met the clinical criteria for one of the EDS subtypes and of these, 15 (15/18, 83%) were confirmed molecularly. Fifty‐four patients (54/72, 75%) had features that overlapped EDS and other syndromes associated with joint hypermobility but did not fully meet clinical criteria. Twelve of them (12/54, 22%) were later shown to have a positive molecular genetic diagnosis of EDS. Different molecular genetic tests were performed on the cohort of 72 patients (EDS panel, n = 44; microarray, n = 25; whole exome sequencing [WES], n = 9; single gene sequencing, n = 3; familial variant testing, n = 10; other genetic panels n = 3). EDS panel was completed in 44 patients (61%), and a molecular diagnosis was confirmed in nine of the patients who satisfied criteria for one of the EDS subtypes (9/12, 75%) and in nine of the patients who did not fully meet criteria (9/32, 28%). We observed a correlation between generalized joint hypermobility, poor healing, easy bruising, atrophic scars, skin hyperextensibility, and developmental dysplasia of the hip with a positive molecular result. This study provides guidance for the use of molecular genetic testing in combination with the 2017 clinical diagnostic criteria in children presenting with EDS characteristics.