Background: There is a substantial and unmet clinical need for pharmacological treatment of cannabis use disorders. Cannabidiol (CBD) could offer a novel treatment but it is unclear which doses might be effective or safe.Methods: Participants meeting DSM-5 cannabis use disorder criteria were allocated to four-week treatment with oral CBD at 200mg, 400mg, 800mg or placebo during a cessation attempt using a double-blinded block randomisation sequence. All received a brief psychological intervention of motivational interviewing. An adaptive Bayesian dose-finding design was used to identify effective/ineffective doses at a priori interim and final analysis stages. The primary objective was to identify the Most Effective Dose (MED) of CBD for reducing cannabis use. The primary endpoint was lower urinary THC-COOH:creatinine concentrations and/or increased days per week abstinent from cannabis during treatment, evidenced by posterior probabilities exceeding Pr=0.9 for CBD versus placebo. All analyses were intention-to-treat.Outcomes: Participants were initially randomised to placebo, 200mg, 400mg and 800mg CBD (n=48; 1:1:1:1). At interim analysis 200mg CBD was eliminated from the trial as an ineffective dose.Randomisation continued to 400mg CBD, 800mg CBD, and placebo (n=34; 1:1:1). At final analysis, both 400mg CBD and 800mg CBD exceeded primary endpoint criteria (Pr=0.9) for both primary outcomes: urinary THC-COOH:creatinine (Pr(400mg=MED │Data)=0.9995; Pr(800mg=MED │Data)=0.9965), days per week abstinent from cannabis (Pr(400mg=MED │Data)=0.9966; Pr(800mg=MED │Data)=0.9247). Compared to placebo, 400mg CBD decreased THC-COOH:creatinine concentrations by -94.21 ng/ml (95% Interval ) and increased abstinence from cannabis by 0.48 days per week (95% Interval Estimate=0.15, 0.82). Compared to placebo, 800mg CBD decreased THC-COOH:creatinine concentrations by -72.02 ng/ml (95% Interval Estimate= -135.47, -19.52) and increased abstinence from cannabis by 0.27 days per week (95% Interval Estimate= -0.09, 0.64). CBD was well tolerated with no severe adverse events and 94% completed treatment.Interpretation: In the first randomised clinical trial of CBD for cannabis use disorder, 400mg and 800mg CBD were safe and more effective than placebo at reducing cannabis use.

The recent liberalisation of cannabis regulation has increased public and scientific debate about its potential benefits and risks. A key focus has been the extent to which cannabidiol (CBD) might influence the acute effects of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), but this has never been reviewed systematically. In this systematic review of how CBD influences the acute effects of THC we identified 16 studies involving 466 participants. Ten studies were judged at low risk of bias. The findings were mixed, although CBD was found to reduce the effects of THC in several studies. Some studies found that CBD reduced intense experiences of anxiety or psychosis-like effects of THC and blunted some of the impairments on emotion and reward processing. However, CBD did not consistently influence the effects of THC across all studies and outcomes. There was considerable heterogeneity in dose, route of administration and THC:CBD ratio across studies and no clear dose-response profile emerged. Although findings were mixed, this review suggests that CBD may interact with some acute effects of THC.

The laws governing cannabis are evolving worldwide and associated with changing patterns of use. The main psychoactive drug in cannabis is Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), a partial agonist at the endocannabinoid CB1 receptor. Acutely, cannabis and THC produce a range of effects on several neurocognitive and pharmacological systems. These include effects on executive, emotional, reward and memory processing via direct interactions with the endocannabinoid system and indirect effects on the glutamatergic, GABAergic and dopaminergic systems. Cannabidiol, a non-intoxicating cannabinoid found in some forms of cannabis, may offset some of these acute effects. Heavy repeated cannabis use, particularly during adolescence, has been associated with adverse effects on these systems, which increase the risk of mental illnesses including addiction and psychosis. Here, we provide a comprehensive state of the art review on the acute and chronic neuropsychopharmacology of cannabis by synthesizing the available neuroimaging research in humans. We describe the effects of drug exposure during development, implications for understanding psychosis and cannabis use disorder, and methodological considerations. Greater understanding of the precise mechanisms underlying the effects of cannabis may also give rise to new treatment targets.

Chronic use of drugs may alter the brain’s reward system, though the extant literature concerning long-term cannabis use and neural correlates of reward processing has shown mixed results. Adolescents may be more vulnerable to the adverse effects of cannabis than adults; however, this has not been investigated for reward processing. As part of the ‘CannTeen’ study, in the largest functional magnetic resonance imaging study of reward processing and cannabis use to date, we investigated reward anticipation and feedback in 125 adult (26–29 years) and adolescent (16–17 years) cannabis users (1–7 days/week cannabis use) and gender- and age-matched controls, using the Monetary Incentive Delay task. Blood-oxygen-level-dependent responses were examined using region of interest (ROI) analyses in the bilateral ventral striatum for reward anticipation and right ventral striatum and left ventromedial prefrontal cortex for feedback, and exploratory whole-brain analyses. Results showed no User-Group or User-Group × Age-Group effects during reward anticipation or feedback in pre-defined ROIs. These null findings were supported by post hoc Bayesian analyses. However, in the whole-brain analysis, cannabis users had greater feedback activity in the prefrontal and inferior parietal cortex compared to controls. In conclusion, cannabis users and controls had similar neural responses during reward anticipation and in hypothesised reward-related regions during reward feedback. The whole-brain analysis revealed tentative evidence of greater fronto-parietal activity in cannabis users during feedback. Adolescents showed no increased vulnerability compared with adults. Overall, reward anticipation and feedback processing appear spared in adolescent and adult cannabis users, but future longitudinal studies are needed to corroborate this.

Rationale There is growing interest in the therapeutic potential of cannabidiol (CBD) across a range of psychiatric disorders. CBD has been found to reduce anxiety during experimentally induced stress in anxious individuals and healthy controls. However, the mechanisms underlying the putative anxiolytic effects of CBD are unknown. Objectives We sought to investigate the behavioural and neural effects of a single dose of CBD vs. placebo on a range of emotion-related measures to test cognitive-mechanistic models of its effects on anxiety. Methods We conducted a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover, acute oral challenge of 600 mg of CBD in 24 healthy participants on emotional processing, with neuroimaging (viewing emotional faces during functional magnetic resonance imaging) and cognitive (emotional appraisal) measures as well as subjective response to experimentally induced anxiety. Results CBD did not produce effects on brain responses to emotional faces and cognitive measures of emotional processing, or modulate experimentally induced anxiety, relative to placebo. Conclusions Given the rising popularity of CBD for its putative medical benefits, these findings question whether further research is warranted to investigate the clinical potential of CBD for the treatment of anxiety disorders.

Cannabis is the most widely used illicit drug worldwide, and it is estimated that up to 30% of people who use cannabis will develop a cannabis use disorder (CUD). Demand for treatment of CUD is increasing in almost every region of the world and cannabis use is highly comorbid with mental disorders, where sustained use can reduce treatment compliance and increase risk of relapse. In this narrative review, we outline evidence for psychosocial and pharmacological treatment strategies for CUD, both alone and when comorbid with psychosis, anxiety or depression. Psychosocial treatments such as cognitive behavioural therapy, motivational enhancement therapy and contingency management are currently the most effective strategy for treating CUD but are of limited benefit when comorbid with psychosis. Pharmacological treatments targeting the endocannabinoid system have the potential to reduce cannabis withdrawal and cannabis use in CUD. Mental health comorbidities including anxiety, depression and psychosis hinder effective treatment and should be addressed in treatment provision and clinical decision making to reduce the global burden of CUDs. Antipsychotic medication may decrease cannabis use and cannabis craving as well as psychotic symptoms in patients with CUD and psychosis. Targeted treatments for anxiety and depression when comorbid with CUD are feasible.

Background: Adolescence is characterised by psychological and neural development. Cannabis harms may be accentuated during adolescence. We hypothesised that adolescents would be more vulnerable to the associations between cannabis use and mental health and addiction problems than adults. Method: As part of the ‘CannTeen’ study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. There were 274 participants: split into groups of adolescent users ( n = 76; 16–17 years old) and controls ( n = 63), and adult users ( n = 71; 26–29 years old) and controls ( n = 64). Among users, cannabis use frequency ranged from 1 to 7 days/week, while controls had 0–10 lifetime exposures to cannabis. Adolescent and adult cannabis users were matched on cannabis use frequency (mean=4 days/week). We measured Diagnostic and Statistical Manual (DSM-5) Cannabis Use Disorder (CUD), Beck Depression Inventory, Beck Anxiety Inventory and Psychotomimetic States Inventory-adapted. Results: After adjustment for covariates, adolescent users were more likely to have severe CUD than adult users (odd ratio = 3.474, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.501–8.036). Users reported greater psychotic-like symptoms than controls ( b = 6.004, 95% CI = 1.211–10.796) and adolescents reported greater psychotic-like symptoms than adults ( b = 5.509, 95% CI = 1.070–9.947). User-group was not associated with depression or anxiety. No significant interactions between age-group and user-group were identified. Exploratory analyses suggested that cannabis users with severe CUD had greater depression and anxiety levels than cannabis users without severe CUD. Conclusion: Adolescent cannabis users are more likely than adult cannabis users to have severe CUD. Adolescent cannabis users have greater psychotic-like symptoms than adult cannabis users and adolescent controls, through an additive effect. There was no evidence of an amplified vulnerability to cannabis-related increases in subclinical depression, anxiety or psychotic-like symptoms in adolescence. However, poorer mental health was associated with the presence of severe CUD.

BackgroundAdolescence is characterised by psychological and neural development. Cannabis harms may be accentuated during adolescence. We hypothesised adolescents would be more vulnerable to cannabis-related mental health and addiction problems than adults.MethodAs part of the ‘CannTeen’ study, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis. There were 274 participants: adolescent users (n=76; 16-17 years old), and controls (n=63), and adult users (n=71; 26-29 years old), and controls (n=64). The users used cannabis 1-7 days/week and controls had 0-10 lifetime exposures to cannabis. We measured DSM-5 CUD, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI), Beck Anxiety Inventory (BAI), and Psychotomimetic States Inventory-adapted (PSI-a). Linear and logistic regressions with age-group, user-group, their interaction, and pre-defined covariates were conducted.ResultsAfter adjustment for covariates, adolescent users were more likely to have severe CUD than adult users (OR=3.474, 95% CI=1.501-8.036). Users reported greater psychotic-like symptoms than controls (b=6.004, 95% CI=1.211-10.796) and adolescents reported greater psychotic-like symptoms than adults (b=5.509, 95% CI=1.070-9.947). Depression and anxiety were not associated with user-group. No significant interactions between age-group and user-group were identified. Exploratory analyses suggested that users with severe CUD had greater depression and anxiety than users without.ConclusionsAdolescent cannabis users are more likely than adult cannabis users to have severe CUD. Adolescent cannabis users have greater psychotic-like symptoms than adult cannabis users and adolescent controls, through an additive effect. There was no evidence of an amplified vulnerability to cannabis-related depression, anxiety, or psychotic-like symptoms in adolescence. However, poorer mental health was associated with the presence of severe CUD.