Racism is now widely recognized as a fundamental cause of health inequali­ties in the United States. As such, health scholars have rightly turned their attention toward examining the role of struc­tural racism in fostering morbidity and mortality. However, to date, much of the empirical structural racism-health dispari­ties literature limits the operationalization of structural racism to a single domain or orients the construct around a White/ Black racial frame. This operationaliza­tion approach is incomprehensive and overlooks the heterogeneity of historical and lived experiences among other racial and ethnic groups.To address this gap, we present a theoreti­cally grounded framework that illumi­nates core mutually reinforcing domains of structural racism that have stratified opportunities for health in the United States. We catalog instances of structural discrimination that were particularly con­straining (or advantageous) to the health of racial and ethnic groups from the late 1400s to present. We then illustrate the utility of this framework by applying it to American Indians or Alaska Natives and discuss the framework’s broader implica­tions for empirical health research. This framework should help future scholars across disciplines as they identify and interrogate important laws, policies, and norms that have differentially constrained opportunities for health among racial and ethnic groups.Ethn Dis. 2021;31(Suppl 1):301-310; doi:10.18865/ed.31.S1.301

Despite repeated calls by scholars to critically engage with the concepts of race and ethnicity in US epidemiologic research, the incorporation of these social constructs in scholarship may be suboptimal. This study characterizes the conceptualization, operationalization, and utilization of race and ethnicity in US research published in leading journals whose publications shape discourse and norms around race, ethnicity, and health within the field of epidemiology. We systematically reviewed randomly selected articles from prominent epidemiology journals across five periods: 1995-99, 2000-04, 2005-09, 2010-14, 2015-18. All original human-subjects research conducted in the US was eligible for review. Information on definitions, measurement, coding, and use in analysis was extracted. We reviewed 1050 articles, including 414 (39%) in analyses. Four studies explicitly defined race and/or ethnicity. Authors rarely made clear delineations between race and ethnicity, often adopting an ethno-racial construct. In the majority of studies across time periods, authors did not state how race and/or ethnicity was measured. Top coding schemes included “Black, White” (race), “Hispanic, Non-Hispanic” (ethnicity), and “Black, White, Hispanic” (ethno-racial). Most often, race and ethnicity were deemed “not of interest” in analyses (e.g., control variable). Broadly, disciplinary practices have remained largely the same between 1995-2018 and are in need of improvement.

BackgroundWhile primary care medical clinics have been the most common setting for the delivery of advice about smoking cessation, the hospital emergency department (ED) is a valuable context for counseling medically underserved tobacco users. We conducted a secondary analysis based on a larger audio-recorded study of patient-provider communication about pain and analgesics in the ED. Within a sample of ED patients with back pain, the purpose of this mixed-methods study was to examine how physicians and nurse practitioners capitalize on “teachable moments” for health education to offer spontaneous smoking cessation counseling in the ED.MethodsPatients presenting to an academic ED with a primary complaint of back pain were invited to participate in a study of patient-provider communication. Audio-recorded encounters were transcribed verbatim. Two coders reviewed each transcript to determine whether smoking was discussed and to build a corpus of smoking-related discussions. We then developed inductively generated coding categories to characterize how providers responded when patients endorsed smoking behavior. Categories were refined iteratively to accommodate discrepancies.ResultsOf 52 patient-provider encounters during which smoking was discussed, two-thirds of the patients indicated that they were smokers. Providers missed opportunities for smoking cessation counseling 70% of the time. Eleven encounters contained teachable moments for smoking cessation. We identified four primary strategies for creating teachable moments: 1) positive reinforcement, 2) encouragement, 3) assessing readiness, and 4) offering concrete motivating reasons.ConclusionsMost providers missed opportunities to offer teachable moments for smoking cessation. In encounters that contained teachable moments, providers employed multiple strategies, combining general advice with motivation tailored to the patient’s particular circumstances. Creating motivational links to enhance smoking cessation efforts may be possible with a minimal investment of ED resources.

Objective We examined the direct and indirect means by which patients express a desire for analgesic medication. Methods Back pain patients presenting to an academic ED were invited to participate in a study of patient-provider communication. Audio-recorded encounters were transcribed verbatim and transcripts analyzed using a qualitative approach based on conversation analysis. Results Requests for analgesics were documented in 15 out of 74 interactions (20%). We identified three basic patterns: direct requests, in which the patient explicitly asked for medication; indirect requests, in which the patient hinted at a desire for medication but did not ask for it outright; and no request, in which the provider discussed a prescription without the patient requesting it. Conclusion Most patients did not request analgesics. When they did so, they utilized strategies of mitigation, indirection, and deference that presented themselves as deserving patients while upholding the physician's autonomy. Practice Implications Patients come to the clinical encounter with a variety of expectations, of which a desire for an analgesic may be only part of the picture. Rather than focusing on strategies for inuring providers to inappropriate patient requests, it may be useful to devote clinical resources to examining patients' priorities and expectations for treatment.

When public health considers the health and disease status of Indigenous people, it often does so using a racial lens. In recent decades, public health researchers have begun to acknowledge that commonly employed racial categories represent history, power dynamics, embodiment, and legacies of discrimination and racism, rather than innate biology. Even so, public health has not yet fully embraced an understanding of other components of identity formation for Indigenous people, including political status within Native nations. In this article, we discuss why the continued racial conceptualization of Indigeneity in US public health is inadequate. We begin by providing a brief account of racialization as a tool of colonization, of failure to recognize and acknowledge Indigenous sovereignty, and of common public health practices of Indigenous data collection and interpretation. We then articulate the stakes of racialized health data for Native communities. We end by offering alternative approaches, many drawn from scholarship from Indigenous researchers. (Am J Public Health. 2021;111(11):1969–1975. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2021.306465 )

BackgroundSystemic racial and ethnic inequities continue to be perpetuated through scientific methodology and communication norms despite efforts by medical institutions. We characterized methodological practices regarding race and ethnicity in U.S. research published in leading medical journals.MethodsWe systematically reviewed randomly selected articles from prominent medical journals: Annals of Internal Medicine, BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and NEJM within five periods: 1995-99, 2000-04, 2005-09, 2010-14, 2015-18. Original human-subjects research conducted in the U.S. was eligible for inclusion. We extracted information on definitions (conceptualization), measurement/coding (operationalization), use in analysis (utilization), and justifications. We reviewed 1050, including 242 (23%) in analyses.FindingsThe proportion of U.S. medical research studies including race and/or ethnicity data increased between 1995 and 2018. However, no studies defined race or ethnicity. Studies rarely delineated between race and ethnicity, frequently opting for a combined “ethno-racial” construct. In addition, most studies did not state how race and/or ethnicity was measured. Common coding schemes included: “Black, other, White,” “Hispanic, Non-Hispanic,” and “Black, Hispanic, other, White.” Race and/or ethnicity was most often used as a control variable, descriptive covariate, or matching criteria. Under 30% of studies included a justification for their methodological choices regarding race and/or ethnicity.InterpretationDespite regular efforts by medical journals to implement new policies around race and ethnicity in medical research, pertinent information around methodology was systematically absent from the majority of reviewed literature. This stymies critical disciplinary reflection and progress towards equitable practice.FundingFunding was provided through training grants from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development [T32 HD091058] and the Department of Sociology, UNC Chapel Hill. Carolina Population Center provided general support [P2C HD050924, P30 AG066615]. NRS received additional support from the National Cancer Institute [T32 CA057711].

Health inequity scholars, particularly those engaged with questions of structural and systemic racism, are increasingly vocal about the limitations of “resilience.” This is true for Indigenous health scholars, who have pushed back against resilience as a descriptor of modern Indigeneity and who are increasingly using the term survivance. Given the growing frequency of survivance in relation to health, we performed a scoping review to understand how survivance is being applied in health scholarship, with a particular interest in its relationship to resilience. Results from 32 papers indicate that health scholars are employing survivance in relation to narrative, temporality, community, decolonization, and sovereignty, with varying degrees of adherence to the term’s original conception. Overwhelmingly, authors employed survivance in relation to historical trauma, leading us to propose the analogy: as resilience is to trauma, so survivance is to historical trauma. There may be value in further operationalizing survivance for health research and practice through the development of a unified definition and measurement tool, ensuring comparability across studies and supporting future strengths-based Indigenous health research and practice.

BackgroundCommercial salmon fishing in Alaska is one of the most dangerous occupations in the United States. Between 1992 and 2008, the average annual industry mortality rate was 128 deaths per 100,000 workers, and despite an increase in industry regulations, there has not been a significant decrease in mortality rate since 2000. Unpredictable fishing openings and fierce competition for limited resources result in periods of intense sleep deprivation and physical strain during the short commercial salmon season in Alaska.ObjectiveWe hypothesize that the combined effect of sleep deprivation, intense physical workload, and significant short-term chronic stress may be deleterious to health in both the short- and long-term among commercial salmon drift gillnet fishermen in Alaska. The objective of this protocol is to determine the feasibility of the study design to test this hypothesis.MethodsThe study design uses mixed methods and includes biometric monitoring consisting of heart rate variability, respiration, and movement data collected via a personal, wearable biometric device. Additional methods include observational data on activity, including duration and quality of sleep, weather, catch, and financial gain, as well as the collection of salivary cortisol. As such, the study will provide a holistic assessment of individual stress on multiple simultaneous timescales: immediately and continuously through the personal wearable biometric device, on the minute-hour level through the multiple daily collections of salivary cortisol, and by the hour-day through the use of participant and environment observational data.ResultsData collection was initiated in July 2017 and will extend through August 2019. Initial data collection has indicated that the methods outlined in this protocol are feasible and allow for effective collection of qualitative and quantitative data related to the psychological and physiological impact of Alaska commercial salmon fishing.ConclusionsWe anticipate that the use of a biometric device will be crucial in establishing measures of stress and physical activity within a population and environment uniquely challenged by physical isolation, strong weather patterns, and the potential for significant financial gain by fishermen. The potential exists for individuals engaged long-term in the fishing industry, through repeated and extended exposure to periods of intense sleep deprivation and chronic stress, to be at increased risk of cardiovascular disease.International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID)DERR1-10.2196/10215