No abstract

The disease mechanism of Rett syndrome (RTT) is not well understood. Studies in RTT mouse models have suggested a non-cell-autonomous role for astrocytes in RTT pathogenesis. However, it is not clear whether this is also true for human RTT astrocytes. To establish an in vitro human RTT model, we previously generated isogenic induced pluripotent stem cell (iPSC) lines from several RTT patients carrying different disease-causing mutations. Here, we show that these RTT iPSC lines can be efficiently differentiated into astroglial progenitors and glial fibrillary acidic protein-expressing (GFAP(+)) astrocytes that maintain isogenic status, that mutant RTT astrocytes carrying three different RTT mutations and their conditioned media have adverse effects on the morphology and function of wild-type neurons and that the glial effect on neuronal morphology is independent of the intrinsic neuronal deficit in mutant neurons. Moreover, we show that both insulin-like growth factor 1 (IGF-1) and GPE (a peptide containing the first 3 amino acids of IGF-1) are able to partially rescue the neuronal deficits caused by mutant RTT astrocytes. Our findings confirm the critical glial contribution to RTT pathology, reveal potential cellular targets of IGF-1 therapy and further validate patient-specific iPSCs and their derivatives as valuable tools to study RTT disease mechanism.

The pioneer event in eukaryotic DNA replication is binding of chromosomal DNA by the origin recognitioncomplex (ORC). The ORC-DNA complex directs the formation of origins, the specific chromosomal regions where DNA synthesis initiates. In all eukaryotes, incompletely understood features of chromatin promote ORC-DNA binding. Here, we uncover a role for the Fkh1 (Forkhead homolog) protein and its forkhead associated (FHA) domain in promoting ORC-origin binding and origin activity at a subset of origins in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Several of the FHA-dependent origins examined required a distinct Fkh1 binding site located 5′ of and proximal to their ORC sites (5′-FKH-T site). Genetic and molecular experiments provided evidence that the Fkh1-FHA domain promoted origin activity directly through Fkh1 binding to this 5′ FKH-T site. Nucleotide substitutions within two relevant origins that enhanced their ORC-DNA affinity bypassed the requirement for their 5′ FKH-T sites and for the Fkh1-FHA domain. Significantly, assessment of ORC-origin binding by ChIPSeq provided evidence that this mechanism was relevant at ∼25% of yeast origins. Thus, the FHA domain of the conserved cell-cycle transcription factor Fkh1 enhanced origin selection in yeast at the level of ORC-origin binding.

The polycomb repressive complexes 1 and 2 (PRCs; PRC1 and PRC2) are conserved histone-modifying enzymes that often function cooperatively to repress gene expression. The PRCs are regulated by long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) in complex ways. On the one hand, specific lncRNAs cause the PRCs to engage with chromatin and repress gene expression over genomic regions that can span megabases. On the other hand, the PRCs bind RNA with seemingly little sequence specificity, and at least in the case of PRC2, direct RNA-binding has the effect of inhibiting the enzyme. Thus, some RNAs appear to promote PRC activity, while others may inhibit it. The reasons behind this apparent dichotomy are unclear. The most potent PRC-activating lncRNAs associate with chromatin and are predominantly unspliced or harbor unusually long exons.Emerging data imply that these lncRNAs promote PRC activity through internal RNA sequence elements that arise and disappear rapidly in evolutionary time. These sequence elements may function by interacting with common subsets of RNA-binding proteins that recruit or stabilize PRCs on chromatin.

The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Fkh1 protein has roles in cell-cycle regulated transcription as well as a transcription-independent role in recombination donor preference during mating-type switching. The conserved FHA domain of Fkh1 regulates donor preference by juxtaposing two distant regions on chromosome III to promote their recombination. A model posits that this Fkh1-mediated long-range chromosomal juxtaposition requires an interaction between the FHA domain and a partner protein(s), but to date no relevant partner has been described. In this study, we used structural modeling, 2-hybrid assays, and mutational analyses to show that the predicted phosphothreonine-binding FHA domain of Fkh1 interacted with multiple partner proteins. The Fkh1 FHA domain was important for its role in cell-cycle regulation, but no single interaction partner could account for this role. In contrast, Fkh1’s interaction with the Mph1 DNA repair helicase regulated donor preference during mating-type switching. Using 2-hybrid assays, co-immunoprecipitation, and fluorescence anisotropy, we mapped a discrete peptide within the regulatory Mph1 C-terminus required for this interaction and identified two threonines that were particularly important. In vitro binding experiments indicated that at least one of these threonines had to be phosphorylated for efficient Fkh1 binding. Substitution of these two threonines with alanines (mph1-2TA) specifically abolished the Fkh1-Mph1 interaction in vivo and altered donor preference during mating-type switching to the same degree as mph1Δ. Notably, the mph1-2TA allele maintained other functions of Mph1 in genome stability. Deletion of a second Fkh1-interacting protein encoded by YMR144W also resulted in a change in Fkh1-FHA-dependent donor preference. We have named this gene FDO1 for Forkhead one interacting protein involved in donor preference. We conclude that a phosphothreonine-mediated protein-protein interface between Fkh1-FHA and Mph1 contributes to a specific long-range chromosomal interaction required for mating-type switching, but that Fkh1-FHA must also interact with several other proteins to achieve full functionality in this process.

The Xist lncRNA requires Repeat A, a conserved RNA element located in its 5′ end, to induce gene silencing during X-chromosome inactivation. Intriguingly, Repeat A is also required for production of Xist. While silencing by Repeat A requires the protein SPEN, how Repeat A promotes Xist production remains unclear. We report that in mouse embryonic stem cells, expression of a transgene comprising the first two kilobases of Xist (Xist-2kb) causes transcriptional readthrough of downstream polyadenylation sequences. Readthrough required Repeat A and the ∼750 nucleotides downstream, did not require SPEN, and was attenuated by splicing. Despite associating with SPEN and chromatin, Xist-2kb did not robustly silence transcription, whereas a 5.5-kb Xist transgene robustly silenced transcription and read through its polyadenylation sequence. Longer, spliced Xist transgenes also induced robust silencing yet terminated efficiently. Thus, in contexts examined here, Xist requires sequence elements beyond its first two kilobases to robustly silence transcription, and the 5′ end of Xist harbors SPEN-independent transcriptional antiterminator activity that can repress proximal cleavage and polyadenylation. In endogenous contexts, this antiterminator activity may help produce full-length Xist RNA while rendering the Xist locus resistant to silencing by the same repressive complexes that the lncRNA recruits to other genes.

The Xist lncRNA requires Repeat A, a conserved RNA element located in its 5′ end, to induce gene silencing during X-chromosome inactivation. Intriguingly, Repeat A is also required for the production of Xist. While silencing by Repeat A requires the protein SPEN, how Repeat A promotes Xist production remains unclear. We report that in mouse embryonic stem cells, expression of a transgene comprising the first two kilobases of Xist (Xist-2kb) causes transcriptional readthrough of multiple downstream polyadenylation sequences. Readthrough required Repeat A and the ~750 nucleotides downstream but did not require SPEN. Despite associating with SPEN and chromatin, Xist-2kb did not robustly silence transcription, whereas a transgene comprising Xist's first 5.5 kilobases robustly silenced transcription and read through its polyadenylation sequence. Longer, spliced Xist transgenes also induced robust silencing yet terminated efficiently. Thus, in contexts examined here, Xist requires sequence elements beyond its first two kilobases to robustly silence transcription, and the 5′ end of Xist harbors SPENindependent transcriptional antiterminator activity that can repress proximal cleavage and polyadenylation. In endogenous contexts, this antiterminator activity may help produce full-length Xist RNA while rendering the Xist locus resistant to silencing by the same repressive complexes that the lncRNA recruits to other genes.

Xist requires Repeat-A, a protein-binding module in its first two kilobases (2kb), to repress transcription. We report that when expressed as a standalone transcript in mouse embryonic stem cells (ESCs), the first 2kb of Xist (Xist-2kb) does not induce transcriptional silencing. Instead, Xist-2kb sequesters RNA produced from adjacent genes on chromatin. Sequestration does not spread beyond adjacent genes, requires the same sequence elements in Repeat-A that full-length Xist requires to repress transcription and can be induced by lncRNAs with similar sequence composition to Xist-2kb. We did not detect sequestration by full-length Xist, but we did detect it by mutant forms of Xist with attenuated transcriptional silencing capability. Xist-2kb associated with SPEN, a Repeat-A binding protein required for Xist-induced transcriptional silencing, but SPEN was not necessary for sequestration. Thus, when expressed in mouse ESCs, a 5′ fragment of Xist that contains Repeat-A sequesters RNA from adjacent genes on chromatin and associates with the silencing factor SPEN, but it does not induce transcriptional silencing. Instead, Xist-induced transcriptional silencing requires synergy between Repeat-A and additional sequence elements in Xist. We propose that sequestration is mechanistically related to the Repeat-A dependent stabilization and tethering of Xist near actively transcribed regions of chromatin.