Baseline serum sodium and SUN values are predictive of the rapidity of hyponatremia correction following tolvaptan use in SIADH. We advise caution when dosing tolvaptan in patients with both low serum sodium and SUN concentrations.

A fraction of the UK Pu inventory may be immobilised in a zirconolite ceramic matrix prior to disposal. Two zirconolite compositions, targeting CaZr0.80Ce0.20Ti2O7 and CaZr0.80U0.20Ti2O7, were fabricated by hot isostatic pressing, alongside a reformulated composition, nominally Ca0.80Zr0.90Ce0.30Ti1.60Al0.40O7, with an excess of Ti and Zr added to preclude the formation of an accessory perovskite phase. Materials were subjected to accelerated leaching in a variety of acidic and alkaline media at 90 °C, over a cumulative period of 14 d. The greatest Ce release was measured from CaZr0.80Ce0.20Ti2.00O7 exposed to 1 M H2SO4, for which 14.7 ± 0.2% of the original Ce inventory was released from the wasteform into solution. The extent of Ce leaching into the solution was correlated with the quantity of perovskite present in the wasteform, and associated with the incorporation and preferential dissolution of Ce3+. CaZr0.80U0.20Ti2.00O7 exhibited improved leach resistance relative to CaZr0.80Ce0.20Ti2.00O7, attributed to the decreased proportion of accessory perovskite, with 7.1 ± 0.1% U released to in 8 M HNO3 after 7 d. The Ca0.80Zr0.90Ce0.30Ti1.60Al0.40O7 composition, with no accessory perovskite phase, presented significantly improved leaching characteristics, with < 0.4%Ce released in both 8 M HNO3 and 1 M H2SO4. These data demonstrate the need for careful compositional design for zirconolite wasteforms with regard to accessory phase formation and surrogate choice.

No abstract

No abstract

Introduction: Pain is the most common complication of sickle cell disease (SCD) and a frequent cause of acute care utilization. It can be acute due to vaso-occlusive crisis or chronic with over 50% of adults experiencing chronic pain.1 Having chronic pain was associated with both high daily opioid use (≥ 90 MME) and worse quality of life (3,4). High daily opioid use in SCD was also associated with higher acute care utilization5 and ~50% of SCD adults presenting to a large urban acute-care centre were on chronic daily opioids.2 Opioids have been the mainstay of treatment for both acute and chronic pain in SCD however there is emerging evidence of the poor efficacy and high toxicity/morbidity associated with continuous daily use of opioids in any patient. These adverse effects include tolerance, dependency, opioid induced hyperalgesia, worsening of mood disorders, constipation and opioid withdrawal. The current opioid crisis demands that we identify alternatives to reduce daily high-dose opioids for treating SCD chronic pain that may also reduce acute care utilization and quality of life. Buprenorphine is a partial Mu receptor agonist and Kappa receptor antagonist. This product is approved to treat chronic pain. Naloxone is a Mu receptor antagonist. Buprenorphine/naloxone (B/N) combination products have been used to treat opioid use disorders and is increasingly used off-label to treat chronic pain in patients with opioid dependence. There is currently no published data on the use of buprenorphine alone or B/N in the management of chronic pain in adults with SCD. METHODS: We hypothesized that use of B/N in adults with SCD reduce both acute care utilization and daily opioid use while improving overall clinical outcomes. Using a retrospective chart audit we evaluated patients transitioned to B/N between January 1st, 2016 and April 30th, 2018 who had at least six months of follow up post transition. Patients were expected to follow up in clinic at least weekly for the first 4 visits, biweekly for 4 visits, and then monthly with a SCD provider and psychotherapist. We evaluated Morphine Equivalent Daily Dose (MEDD), acute care (ED) visits, inpatient (IP) admissions, length of stay (LOS), comorbid psychiatric diagnosis, hemoglobin S% (HbS) and F% (HbF) as markers of adherence to disease modifying therapy use and serum ferritin. MEDD was calculated by averaging monthly opioid use and included both outpatient prescriptions from the state's-controlled substance database and inpatient opioid doses administered from the electronic medical record, respectively. ED/IP visits (normalized on an annual basis), average LOS, and lab values were compared over two time-periods: from the date of entry into our SCD program to the date of initiation of B/N (switch date), and from the switch date to the last follow-up date. MEDD was compared for the 6 months pre- and post- initiation of B/N. Outcomes were analysed using generalized linear mixed models with the pre- and post-switch date as the fixed factor in the model. A random effect for subject was included to account the repeated observations. Results: Twenty-four patients were evalauted: 67% Female; median age 36 years (range 18 - 65). Genotype distribution: HbSS 15 (63%); HbSC 5 (21%); SB+Thal 4 (17%); 92% had a comorbid psychiatric condition (major depression, bipolar disorder, generalized anxiety disorder). Our results (summarized in Table 1) demonstrate significant reductions in acute care utilization (ED/IP visits, average IP LOS) and MEDD after initiation of B/N (p&lt;0.001). No significant differences were noted in Ferritin level and HbF% between pre- and post-initiation of B/N. There was a trend towards reduced HbS% as a marker of adherence to monthly erythrocytapheresis however sample size was small. Conclusion: These results demonstrate that Buprenorphine/naloxone is effective in reducing acute care utilization among adults with SCD and drastically lowering the amount of daily opioids used to manage chronic pain. The impact of B/N on acute care utilization and daily opioid use was independent of adherence to disease modifying therapy (hydroxycarbamide and chronic erythrocytapheresis). Disclosures Osunkwo: Micella Biopharma: Other: DSMB Member ; Terumo: Speakers Bureau; Pfizer: Consultancy; Novartis: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau. Symanowski:Boston Biomedical: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Eli Lilly: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Immatics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Carsgen Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Background: Treatment-dose enoxaparin is not well studied in obese patients. Guidelines suggest that obese patients receiving enoxaparin therapy for acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) should receive a standard initial dose, 1 mg/kg, based on actual body weight. It is possible that this dosing strategy in obese patients may be overestimated, leading to a higher bleeding risk compared to non-obese patients. Objective: To gather data regarding enoxaparin treatment dosing and anti-Xa level monitoring in patients who are obese to guide dose adjustments. Methods: A single-center, retrospective chart review that included patients who were ordered treatment-dose enoxaparin and had a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, which resulted in an automatic pharmacy consult.The primary endpoint of this study was incidence of bleeding. Results: The analysis included 102 patients. Most patients (92.1%) had a BMI of ≥ 40-60 kg/m2 while 7.8% of patients had a BMI of > 60 kg/m2. The average initial and final doses were 1.0 ± 0.1 mg/kg and 0.9 ± 0.2 mg/kg, respectively. The incidence of bleeding was 4.9%. The average dose for those that bled was 0.7 ± 0.1 mg/kg. On average, patients who bled had higher BMIs than patients who did not bleed (51.6 kg/m2 vs. 48.0 kg/m2). Of the 71 patients with an initial anti-Xa level, 42 of the levels were considered supratherapeutic (59.2%). Conclusion: A 1 mg/kg starting dose of enoxaparin may be too high for patients who are obese as many patients required an adjustment to their dose after initial anti-Xa levels.

No abstract

Objectives This review aimed to present the clinical and health-care outcomes for patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) who use home monitoring technologies. Methods Five databases were systematically searched from inception to November 2020 for quantitative studies in this area. Data were extracted using a pre-formatted data-collection table which included information on participants, interventions, outcome measures and results. Risk of bias was determined using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool for randomised controlled trials (RCTs), the Newcastle–Ottawa Quality Assessment Scale for cohort studies and the Institute of Health Economics quality appraisal checklist for case-series studies. Data synthesis: Twenty-two studies were included in this systematic review, which included four RCTs, 12 cohort studies and six case-series studies. Seventeen studies reported on mortality rates, with 59% reporting that home monitoring programmes were associated with either a significant reduction or trend for lower mortality and 12% reporting that mortality trended higher. Fourteen studies reported on unplanned readmissions/health-care resource use, with 29% of studies reporting that this outcome was significantly decreased or trended lower with home monitoring and 21% reported an increase. Impact on treatment was reported in 15 studies, with 67% of studies finding that either treatment was undertaken significantly earlier or significantly more interventions were undertaken in the home monitoring groups. Conclusion The use of home monitoring programmes may be beneficial in reducing mortality, enabling earlier and more timely detection and treatment of CHD complication. However, currently, this evidence is limited due to weakness in study designs.