Emerging adults are at an increased risk for trauma exposure, both interpersonal and noninterpersonal, which often occurs within a social context. How an individual interacts with this context may heighten or buffer against their risk for trauma. Social goal orientation represents individual differences that characterize how an individual navigates their social environment. These orientations fall along the 2 interacting dimensions, agency and communion. In a community sample (N = 274; 55% female, average age = 18.9 years) of young adults, we sought to examine the role that these 2 types of social goals, both uniquely and in interaction with one another, may play in interpersonal and noninterpersonal trauma risk. Because men and women are at differential risk for trauma, we also examined the impact of gender on these associations. Findings revealed that social goal orientations are linked to trauma exposure in ways that differ depending on the type of trauma, interpersonal or noninterpersonal. Moreover, these processes differed for men and women. Whereas a high communal orientation was associated with decreased exposure to all trauma, for both women and men, agentic orientation was associated with an increased number of interpersonal and noninterpersonal trauma. For men, agency and communion interacted, suggesting that the extent to which an agentic orientation may be risky or protective for interpersonal trauma depends strongly on communal orientation. These findings provided initial evidence for the role social goal orientation may play as a risk or protective factor for trauma exposure.

Objective: Verbal sexual coercion (VSC) is the most prevalent and pervasive form of sexual victimization that women experience, yet the long-term harmful effects of this type of experience are unknown. The current study examined the effects of verbal sexual coercion versus forcible sexual assault (FSA) on alcohol use and alcohol consequences, two deleterious outcomes that have been linked to sexual victimization. Method: In a sample of college women (N = 649), lifetime history of VSC and FSA were examined as predictors of trajectories of alcohol outcomes with latent growth models. Participants were assessed at six timepoints over their first year of college, a critical transition period of increased risk for both alcohol use and trauma exposure. We also examined the influence of victimization characteristics, such as relationship to the perpetrator and revictimization experiences in these associations. Results: VSC experiences were predictive of higher levels of alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences (i.e., intercept). This risk was sustained throughout the first year of college. VSC experiences did not predict changes (i.e., slope) in alcohol outcomes over this time. In contrast, FSA was not predictive of either initial level or change in alcohol use and consequences over time. Conclusion: Findings highlight the importance of distinguishing among types of coercive experiences, as they show unique associations with later harmful outcomes. Verbal sexual coercion, common in the lives of young women but often overlooked in the extant literature, is associated with substantial negative impact during the first year of college. Clinical Impact StatementWomen who have experienced verbal sexual coercion are at a higher risk for alcohol use and alcohol-related consequences. This elevated risk is sustained across the first college year. Identification of and intervention for those at greatest risk will be facilitated by assessments that explicitly inquire about women's exposure to the full range of coercive experiences. Helping women to identify and name their experiences can foster greater understanding of how these common types of eventssometimes overlooked-may still place them at risk for experiencing consequences.

Background: Identifying factors that protect against alcohol-related negative consequences associated with emerging adult drinking is a critical public health issue. It has been proposed that high levels of self-regulation moderate risks associated with drinking, decreasing alcohol-related negative consequences. Past research testing this possibility is limited by a lack of advanced methodology for testing moderation and failure to consider facets of self-regulation. This study addressed these limitations.Methods: Three hundred fifty-four community emerging adults (56% female; predominantly non-Hispanic Caucasian (83%) or African American (9%)) were assessed annually for 3 years. Moderational hypotheses were tested using multilevel models and the Johnson-Neyman technique was used to examine simple slopes. Data were organized such that repeated measures (level 1) were nested within participants (level 2) to test cross-sectional associations. Self-regulation was operationalized as effortful control and its facets (attentional, inhibitory, and activation control). Results:We found evidence of moderation. The association between alcohol use during a heavy drinking week and consequences weakened as effortful control increased. This pattern was supported for two facets (attentional and activation control), but not for inhibitory control. Regions of significance results revealed that this protective effect was only evident at very high levels of self-regulation. Conclusions:The results provide some evidence that very high levels of attentional and activation control protect against alcohol-related negative consequences associated with drinking. Emerging adults who are very high in attentional and activation control are likely better able to control their attention and engage in goal-directed behavior, like leaving a party at a reasonable hour, or attending school and/or work when experiencing the punishing effects of a hangover. Results emphasize the importance of distinguishing facets of self-regulation when testing self-regulation models.

No abstract