Background and Aims Although medications for opioid use disorder (OUD), including extended‐release naltrexone (XR‐NTX), have demonstrated effectiveness, adherence is often low. We tested the preliminary efficacy of youth opioid recovery support (YORS), a multi‐component intervention designed to improve engagement and medication adherence for young adults with OUD. Design Single‐site randomized controlled trial with 24‐week follow‐up. Setting Community substance use disorder treatment program in Baltimore, MD, USA. Participants Young adults aged 18–26 years enrolled in inpatient/residential OUD treatment intending to pursue outpatient OUD treatment with XR‐NTX. Twenty‐one participants were randomized to YORS and 20 to treatment as usual (TAU). The analyzed sample was 65.8% male. Intervention and comparator Components of YORS include: (1) home delivery of XR‐NTX; (2) family engagement; (3) assertive outreach; and (4) contingency management for receipt of XR‐NTX doses. The comparator was TAU, which consisted of a standard referral to outpatient care following an inpatient stay. Measurements Primary outcomes were number of XR‐NTX doses received over 24 weeks and relapse to opioid use (defined as ≥ 10 days of use within 28 days) at 24 weeks. Findings Participants in the YORS condition received more XR‐NTX doses [mean = 4.28; standard deviation (SD) = 2.3] compared with those in TAU (mean = 0.70; SD = 1.2), P < 0.01. Participants in the YORS group compared with TAU had lower rates of relapse (61 versus 95%; P < 0.01). Survival analyses revealed group differences on time to relapse with participants in TAU being more likely to relapse sooner compared with participants in the YORS condition [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.72, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26–5.88, P < 0.01]. Conclusions The youth opioid recovery support intervention for extended‐release naltrexone adherence and opioid relapse prevention among young adults with opioid use disorder appeared to improve treatment and relapse outcomes compared with standard treatment.
Objectives: The effectiveness of treatment incorporating relapse prevention medications for opioid use disorder (OUD) is typically examined in research using rigidly predefined endpoints of success versus failure, usually over a single episode of care. But this perspective may not adequately portray the nonlinear trajectories typical of real-world treatment courses in this chronic, remitting, and relapsing disorder. Methods: This descriptive study examined 12-month treatment trajectories of n = 60 patients enrolled at a single site of a larger multisite randomized controlled trial examining the comparative effectiveness of buprenorphine versus extended-release naltrexone. While the parent study provided medication treatment through the research protocol for 6 months, this study documents treatment up to 12 months, including medications, provided through standard community resources (treatment as usual) outside of the protocol. Results: Some patients continued medications past the end of the study intervention, whereas others did not. Some patients initiated medications other than the one assigned by the study. Some patients switched from 1 medication to the other. Many patients returned to treatment after 1 or more periods of dropout and/or relapse. Patients utilized multiple episodes of bed-based care, including short-term acute residential and long-term residential treatment, and also recovery housing supports. Described trajectories are also depicted graphically. At 12 months, while rates of continuous treatment retention were low (8%), rates of cross-sectional treatment engagement including return to treatment after drop out were higher (35%). Conclusions: This description of nonlinear treatment trajectories highlights the potential benefits of flexibility and optimism in the promotion of re-engagement, despite interim outcomes that might traditionally be considered “failure” endpoints.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.