Sintered ceramics and glass-ceramics are widely used as biomaterials for dental restoration, especially as dental inlays, onlays, veneers, crowns or bridges. Biomaterials were developed either to veneer metal frameworks or to produce metal-free dental restorations. Different types of glass-ceramics and ceramics are available and necessary today to fulfill customers' needs (patients, dentists and dental technicians) regarding the properties of the biomaterials and the processing of the products. All of these different types of biomaterials already cover the entire range of indications of dental restorations. Today, patients are increasingly interested in metal-free restoration. Glass-ceramics are particularly suitable for fabricating inlays, crowns and small bridges, as these materials achieve very strong, esthetic results. High-strength ceramics are preferred in situations where the material is exposed to high masticatory forces.

A structured literature review aimed to elucidate test parameters for in vitro testing of post-endodontic restorations. The literature was digitally searched using MEDLINE, EMBASE, MedPilot and an additional hand search was performed. Two independent researchers assessed the articles in relation to the defined inclusion and exclusion criteria. The literature search revealed 125 abstracts. Sixty-nine studies were included. Fifty-seven per cent of the studies investigated maxillary incisors only. The restorative stage as complex of tooth, post, core, and crown and post-and-core restored specimens without crowns were used most frequently. Fifty-nine per cent of the studies used static loading. Only 15% of the studies performed thermocycling and mechanical loading (TCML). However, the number of thermo- and load cycles varied. The cross-head speed of linear loading after TCML ranged from 0.01 to 150 mm min(-1). The reviewed studies were heterogeneous in test design regarding the used test parameters. A methodological standardization of in vitro testing of post-endodontic restorations is recommended.

No abstract

No abstract

Both evaluation methods were found to be equally appropriate for quantifying the cement interface homogeneity of SEM cross-sections of adhesively luted GFPs.