Visual latency difference was determined directly in normal volunteers, using the rotating Pulfrich technique described by Nickalls [Vision Research, 26, 367-372 (1986)]. Subjects fixated a black vertical rod rotating clockwise on a horizontal turntable turning with constant angular velocity (16.6,33.3 or 44.7 revs/min) with a neutral density filter (OD 0.7 or 1.5) in front of the right eye. For all subjects the latency difference associated with the 1.5 OD filter was significantly greater (P < 0.001) with the rod rotating at 16.6 rev/min than at 33.3 revs/min. The existence of an inverse relationship between latency difference and angular velocity is hypothesized.
This article describes a new and general line-and-conic property, leading to a consideration of a ‘six-point’ circle and the related geometry of an interesting visual illusion.
Girls aged between 18 and 25 were eligible for the job, provided they looked the part and had a basic grasp of maths. From The Times, 4 November 1999, gleaned by Frank Tapson who comments 'They had to be good-with figures!'
We tested the validity of Nickalls’ formula for determining visual latency difference by using two rotating Pulfrich techniques: (A) varying viewing distance while keeping target angular velocity constant (33 rev/min) and (B) varying the target angular velocity while keeping the viewing distance constant (180 cm). The formula predicts that the latency differences estimated by the two techniques are equal with a given neutral density filter. Observers were asked to judge whether or not the rotating target (clockwise) appeared to move back-and-forth from side-to-side with a neutral density filter (OD = 0.7, 1.0, 1.3) in front of the right eye. The results with ten observers showed that the mean visual latency differences associated with each technique for a given filter were not significantly different. These results further validate the Nickalls’ formula and, therefore, support the visual-latency hypothesis to account for the Pulfrich phenomenon.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.