Laryngotracheal stenosis (LTS) is a rare but serious condition characterized by narrowing of the airway. Iatrogenic injury from endotracheal intubation or tracheostomy insertion is the most common cause of LTS. We present the first reported experience of managing a patient diagnosed with subglottic stenosis (a subtype of LTS) following previous intubation and tracheostomy for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). This patient required an urgent surgical tracheostomy and subsequent referral to a tertiary airway surgery unit for definitive treatment, which included microlaryngoscopy, laser excision and balloon dilatation. This case highlights that LTS should be included in the differential diagnosis for patients re-presenting with breathing difficulties after prolonged intubation or tracheostomy for COVID-19. Furthermore, it raises the concern of a rise in the incidence of this condition and an increased burden on the few units specializing in airway surgery.
COVIDTrach is a UK multidisciplinary collaborative project that aims to evaluate the outcomes of tracheostomy in COVID-19 patients. It also examines the implementation of national guidance in COVID-19 tracheostomies and the incidence of COVID-19 infections amongst those health care workers involved in the procedure. An invitation to participate in an online survey tool (REDCap) was disseminated to all UK NHS departments involved in tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients via the Federation of Surgical Specialty Associations, it's subsidiary organisations and the Intensive Care Society. To date 78 hospitals have submitted 564 COVID-19 tracheostomy cases. Fifty-two percent (n=219/465) of patients who had undergone tracheostomy and were still alive, had been successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation at the point of completing the survey. The all cause in-hospital mortality following tracheostomy was 12% (n=62/530), with 3% of these (n=2/62) due to tracheostomy related complications and the remaining deaths due to COVID-19 related complications. Amongst 400 cases submitting data two weeks after the tracheostomy, no instance of COVID-19 infection amongst operators was recorded. FFP3 masks or Powered Air Purifying Respirators were used by operators in 100% of tracheostomies and a face visor or hood with face shield was available in 99% of cases. This interim report highlights early outcomes following tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated COVID-19 patients. Future reporting from COVIDTrach will include more detailed analysis at later timepoints using comparator groups in order to provide a more comprehensive assessment of tracheostomy in COVID-19.
Introduction Epistaxis is one of the most common ENT conditions leading to unplanned hospital admission. This closed loop quality improvement project looked at epistaxis admissions, and whether patients could be safely managed on an ambulatory basis with unilateral intranasal packing, through the implementation of a new epistaxis pathway. Method Two prospective cycles at a District General Hospital. First cycle: three-month period (October-December 2018); recorded all patients admitted with epistaxis and the percentage with intranasal packing; criteria for discharge with unilateral intranasal packing created (including normal observations, normal clotting/haemoglobin, only on aspirin, safe home environment). Second cycle (after implementation of new pathway): two months (December 2019 and January 2020); recorded all patients admitted with epistaxis or discharged with unilateral intranasal packing; patient feedback obtained. Results First cycle: 31 epistaxis admissions; 12 patients met discharge criteria; average length of stay was 1.4 days. Second cycle: 22 epistaxis admissions; 4 admissions were avoided; 2 admissions were unnecessary according to new pathway; no patient-reported issues with pack at home. Conclusions Successful creation and initial implementation of pathway with no adverse outcomes. Approximately £1380 of savings through avoided admissions. Pathway expanded and successfully used during COVID-19 to include patients on anticoagulation as suitable for discharge with intranasal packing.
Background: Radiological localization imaging aids in the identification of abnormal parathyroid glands resulting in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT), thereby facilitating minimally invasive parathyroid surgery. Sometimes initial imaging may fail to identify the abnormal gland and imaging may therefore be repeated. This study explored patient outcomes of repeated parathyroid localization imaging, after initial negative gland localization, at a United Kingdom institution.Methodology: Data was retrospectively collected and analyzed for patients with PHPT undergoing repeated imaging during a five-year period (2015)(2016)(2017)(2018)(2019)(2020). The total number of episodes of scanning, types of scans performed, the time interval between scans and the imaging success of gland localization were recorded. We explored the reasons for repeated imaging and attempted to identify any factors that might predict subsequent positive radiological localization.Results: A total of 45 patients were identified who underwent repeated localizing imaging after first localizing imaging was negative. Of these, 39 did not undergo surgery despite repeat imaging being undertaken; 11 out of these 39 patients (28%) had subsequent positive localization scans. Again, a large proportion of patients were managed conservatively, despite the repeated sets of imaging being done. Patients undergoing three or four sets of repetitive imaging did not have imaging or surgical success. Conclusion:A streamlined parathyroid pathway should be followed whereby patients should be triaged for suitability for surgery prior to repeated imaging. A second set of scans should be offered when patients are unsuitable for conservative management and are willing and fit to undergo surgery. There is no merit to repeating imaging more than twice.
Background: COVIDTrach is a UK multi-centre prospective cohort study project evaluating the outcomes of tracheostomy in patients with COVID-19 receiving mechanical ventilation. It also examines the incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection among healthcare workers involved in the procedure. Method: An invitation to participate was sent to all UK NHS departments involved in tracheostomy in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19. Data was entered prospectively and clinical outcomes updated over time via an online database (REDCap). Clinical variables were compared with clinical outcomes using multivariable regression analysis, with logistic regression used to develop a prediction model for mortality. Participants recorded whether any of the operators tested positive for SARS-CoV-2 within two weeks of the procedure. Findings: The cohort comprised 1605 tracheostomy cases from 126 UK hospitals. The median time from intubation to tracheostomy was 15 days (IQR 11, 21). 285 (18%) patients died following the procedure. 1229 (93%) of the survivors had been successfully weaned from mechanical ventilation at censoring and 1049 (81%) had been discharged from hospital. Age, inspired oxygen concentration requirement on the day of tracheostomy, PEEP setting, pyrexia, number of days of ventilation before tracheostomy, C-reactive protein and the use of anticoagulation and inotropic support independently predicticted mortality. Six reports were received of operators testing positive for SARS-CoV-2 within two weeks following the procedure. Interpretation: Tracheostomy appears to be safe in mechanically ventilated patients with COVID-19 and to operators performing the procedure and we identified clinical indicators that are predictive of mortality. Optimal timing of the procedure remains to be determined. Funding: The COVIDTrach project is supported by the Wellcome Trust UCL COVID-19 Rapid Response Award and the National Institute for Health Research.
deployed as a pre-close technique. 1 If complete haemostasis is not achieved, then the following adjunct procedure/s is/are employed.
Aorto-oesophageal fistula (AOF) is a life-threatening condition that usually presents with upper gastro-intestinal haemorrhage. This case report details the emergency presentation and management of a 51-year-old male who presented with hematemesis secondary to an impacted denture (ingested two years previously) in the oesophagus that had led to an AOF. This necessitated urgent thoracic endovascular aortic repair followed by thoracotomy, oesophagotomy, T-tube insertion and oesophagostomy. This is the first documentation in the literature of the dual-modality management for this rare cause of AOF and demonstrates the multidisciplinary approach to successful management of this complex yet rare presentation.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.