Malignant parotid tumors account for approximately 20% of all parotid lesions. In addition to the various primary parotid lesions there are secondary parotid malignancies, such as metastases or lymphomas. Data on histopathological distribution of all malignancies-including secondary parotid lesions-is limited. Recent evidence indicated a rising surgical incidence of secondary parotid malignancies. This study aims to review the distribution of malignancies in parotid resections from a salivary gland center. A retrospective review of prospectively collected data for all patients who had received parotidectomy between 2014 and 2019 was performed. Histopathological distribution was displayed separately for all parotid malignancies and for primary parotid malignancies. Further, patients` characteristics were compared between benign and malignant parotid lesions and between the two most common malignant parotid lesions. Out of 777 patients, 614 (78.9%) patients had a benign and 164 (21.1%) patients had a malignant parotid lesion. The most common parotid malignancy was metastatic cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (cSCC) accounting for 35.4% of all parotid malignancies. 71.5% of all malignant lesions were secondary malignancies. Patients with metastatic cSCC were significantly older (p < 0.001) and significantly more likely to be male (p < 0.001) than patients with primary parotid malignancies. No significant difference was found when the lesion size of metastatic cSCC was compared to primary parotid malignancies (p = 0.216). The present study shows the high prevalence of secondary parotid malignancies in patients who had received parotidectomy. Furthermore, it confirms a rising surgical incidence of metastatic cSCC to the parotid gland in a series from a salivary gland center. At this time, parotid surgery for malignant lesions is more likely to be performed for metastases than for primary parotid malignancies.

Purpose The COVID-19 pandemic has affected healthcare systems worldwide. Data on the impact on otolaryngological clinics and private practices is sparse. This study aimed to present data on healthcare worker (HCW) screening, status of HCW, pre-interventional testing, the use of personal protective equipment (PPE) and the economic impact of the pandemic. Methods Otolaryngological private practices and hospital-based departments were surveyed nationwide using an online questionnaire. Participating facilities were recruited via the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology and the German Association for Otolaryngologists in Bavaria. Results 365 private practices (2776 employees) and 65 hospitals (2333 employees) were included. Significantly more hospitals (68.7%) than practices (40.5%) performed pre-interventional testing in their outpatients (p < 0.00). Most inpatients were tested in practices and hospitals (100.0% and 95.0%; p = 0.08). HCW screening was performed in 73.7% of practices and in 77.3% of hospitals (p = 0.54). Significantly more HCW infections were reported in private practices (4.7%) than in hospital (3.6%; p = 0.03). The private or home environment was the most frequent source of infection among HCW in hospitals (44%) and practices (63%). The use of PPE increased over the course of the pandemic. The number of procedures and the revenue decreased in 2020. ConclusionThe rate of pre-interventional testing among outpatients in otolaryngological practices is low and HCW infections were found to be more frequent in practices than in hospitals. In addition, a high rate of infections in otolaryngological HCW seems to stem from the private or home environment.

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract