Crop evapotranspiration (ETC) of rice under an alternate wetting and drying (AWD) irrigation practice may be different from conventional (CON) irrigation methods due to the drying (water stress) phase. The focus of this study was to identify a suitable approach for estimating ETC for a rice crop under AWD practice. Field lysimeters were used for estimating daily ETC under AWD and CON practices during monsoon and non‐monsoon seasons. Lysimeter‐based evapotranspiration (ETC_Lys) was compared with that resulting from the product of reference evapotranspiration (FAO‐56 Penman–Monteith equation), crop coefficient (FAO tabulated values‐KC_Tab and FAO equation‐KC_Eqn) and soil water stress coefficient (linear equation‐KS_Lin; FAO equation‐KS_FAO; logarithmic equation‐KS_Log). The KC_Eqn and KS_FAO methods were found to be better estimates for KC and KS, respectively, for AWD practice. The mean KC in initial, mid and late season for AWD were found to be very close to CON practice. The KS was observed to vary from 1 to 0.15 for AWD. Overall, AWD irrigation practice saved 10–20% irrigation water with about 2% reduction in grain yield and 13% reduction in ETC. The reduction in ETC indicated that KS must be considered when calculating the ETC in rice under AWD irrigation practice.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.