San Diego, Calif.) was compared with a culture reference method for the detection of Chlamydia trachomatis. Using stock isolates of each of the 15 serovars (A to K, Ba, Lt, L2, and L3) of C. trachomatis, the lower limit of sensitivity for the DNA probe ranged between 1,086 inclusion-forming units (IFU) for serovar E (Bour) to 2,930 IFU for serovar Lt (440), with the only exception being serovar C (TW-3), with which 99 IFU was detected. There was no cross-reactivity with Chlamydia psittaci (Texas turkey) and Chlamydia pneumoniae (TWAR-183). Bacterial and fungal isolates representing 14 species of normal vaginal fora as well as Neisseria gonorrhoeae gave negative results with the DNA probe when tested at a level of 1.5 x 107 CFU/mI. In addition, the DNA probe, a direct fluorescent-antibody stain (DFA) (MicroTrak; Syva Corp., Palo Alto, Calif.), and an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (Chlamydiazyme; Abbott Laboratories, North Chicago, 111.) were compared with culture for the detection of C. trachomatis, using 196 clinical cervical samples. Of the 196 samples, 20 (10%) were culture positive. Of the 176 culture-negative samples, 1 was not evaluated by DNA probe and 4, because of a lack of cellular material, were not evaluated by DFA. The sensitivities of the DNA probe, DFA, and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay were 60, 75, and 85%, respectively, and specificities were 95, 99, and 97%, respectively. Of the false-positive direct results, there was only one specimen with which more than one direct method was positive, and with this specimen all three direct methods were positive. The majority of false-negative results by the direct methods were from specimens which by the culture method gave <100 IFU per culture.
An inclusion fluorescent-antibody assay (IFA) with McCoy cells infected with Chlamydia trachomatis serovar L2 was compared with a single-antigen (L2) microimmunofluorescence (MIF) assay for the detection of antichlamydial antibodies. A total of 562 serum specimens were tested by both assays, and sera representing a range of titers were tested for their ability to neutralize the infectivity of C. trachomatis. Overall, there was poor correlation between the two assays (r2 = 0.62). With most sera the inclusion IFA was more sensitive. There was better correlation between IFA titer and ability to neutralize the five serovars tested (L2, L3, C, E, and F) than between the MIF assay and neutralization. In summary, the IFA appeared to be more sensitive than the MIF assay for detecting antibodies to C. trachomatis.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.