m e d i c a l j o u r n a l a r m e d f o r c e s i n d i a 7 2 ( 2 0 1 6 ) 2 4 7 -2 5Methods: An observational case series was designed with the hypothesis that a combination of HB and IVRA would overcome the aforementioned drawbacks. A standardized protocol was followed for HB with 0.1 ml/kg of 0.5% bupivacaine preceding the conduct of IVRA, which permitted adequate exsanguination of the extremity (using compression bandage). For IVRA, 0.5% lignocaine at 3 mg/kg was used with an electro-pneumatic tourniquet. Pain scores were noted after the HB, at exsanguination and during surgery.Results: 100 cases were studied. Average time of onset of block after HB was 2 min 18 s. By the time the IVRA procedure was performed, 99% of patients had a pain score of zero. The quality of surgical anaesthesia revealed that 94% of the patients did not have any pain of incision, tourniquet or positioning at any time during surgery. Conclusion:The use of dual technique of HB and IVRA improved patient acceptance and compliance, and the safety and efficacy of the IVRA. The combination anaesthesia was found to be easy to administer, effective and safe with no complications. #

Background: Gastro laryngeal tube (GLT) is a newly introduced device. It is an advanced purpose specific design (essentially a modified laryngeal tube) which especially provides a separate wide channel specifically designed for the introduction of a gastroscope for endoscopic retrograde cholangio-pancreatography (ERCP), simultaneously functioning as a supra-glottic airway device for ventilation. Methods: In a randomized controlled trial on 100 patients undergoing ERCP under GA, GLT was compared with endotracheal tube as an alternative airway device. Device insertion conditions, oxygenation and ventilation parameters were recorded. Results: GLT was found to be comparable with ETT. Success rate of insertion of GLT was high (92%) and the insertion time of GLT was significantly shorter 42 (20-210) s vs. 206 (176-320) smedian (range). Both the devices were equally effective in normal oxygenation and ventilation. The recovery time was significantly shorter and postoperative complications such as hoarseness and dysphonia were less common in GLT group. Inserting conditions for the duodenoscope were better in GLT group. Conclusion:In this study, likely to be first of its kind, it is concluded that the GLT is a suitable and better alternative to ETT as it allows adequate ventilation and is associated with faster recovery times and minimal extubation-related complications while enhancing operative conditions for gastroenterologists. Its regular use in patients undergoing ERCP is strongly recommended.

No abstract

Background: Inter-costal chest drain (ICD) used for varied thoracic pathologies causes continuous pain and irritation of the pleura, which limits respiratory efforts and impairs ventilatory function. Intrapleural block deposits local anaesthetic between the layers of pleura and may improve ventilatory function especially in non surgical patients. Methods: Twenty eight ASA I-III patients treated with ICD, who could perform incentive spirometry, were included for study. They were randomized to 'Group C' (control group); 'Group B' (Bupivacaine); 'Group M' (Bupivacaine + Morphine) and 'Group D' (Bupivacaine + Dexmedetomidine). The drugs were administered via the ICD itself and clamped thereafter for 15 min. The success of the block was assessed by time for first analgesic demand, maximum inspiratory volume generated and Numerical Rating Scale score for pain; by patients. Results: Effective analgesia was observed in Group B, M and D. Addition of an adjuvant significantly prolonged time for rescue analgesic demand. Patients who received local anaesthetic alone or with an adjuvant had significantly improved maximal inspiratory volume and required lesser rescue analgesics. No significant complications were observed in any group. Pain relief in post-surgical patients using intraplural block is masked by systemic analgesics. However its application in patients with ICD for non surgical indications was explored in this study and was found to improve patient comfort and ventilation. Conclusion: Intra-pleural blockade is safe and effective in relieving the constant pleural irritation and pain of ICD, thus enabling the patient to improve ventilatory effort and faster recovery of respiratory function.

secondary care health delivery system is well developed and regular follow up is well ensured, we can design a larger study with an inbuilt system to assess the achievement of treatment goals periodically. This mechanism to audit comprehensive healthcare delivery in a condition like Type 2 DM which has such a significant impact on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality will be a huge step towards achieving improved health for our clientele. r e f e r e n c e s 1. Menon AS, Ahluwalia AI. The ABC of diabetes. How many patients are able to achieve the goal laid down by American Diabetes Association? Med J Armed Forces India. 2015;71: 132e134. 2. UK Prospective Diabetes Study (UKPDS) Group. Intensive blood-glucose control with sulphonylureas or insulin compared with conventional treatment and risk of complications in patients with type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 33).