Purpose Results of a study to determine the effect of a pharmacist-led opioid task force on emergency department (ED) opioid use and discharge prescriptions are presented. Methods An observational evaluation was conducted at a large tertiary care center (ED volume of 115,000 visits per year) to evaluate selected opioid use outcomes before and after implementation of an ED opioid reduction program by interdisciplinary task force of pharmacists, physicians, and nurses. Volumes of ED opioid orders and discharge prescriptions were evaluated over the entire 25-month study period and during designated 1-month preimplementation and postimplementation periods (January 2017 and January 2018). Opioid order trends were evaluated using linear regression analysis and further investigated with an interrupted time series analysis to determine the immediate and sustained effects of the program. Results From January 2017 to January 2018, ED opioid orders were reduced by 63.5% and discharge prescriptions by 55.8% from preimplementation levels: from 246.8 to 90.1 orders and from 85.3 to 37.7 prescriptions per 1,000 patient visits, respectively. Over the entire study period, there were significant decreases in both opioid orders (β, –78.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], –88.0 to –68.9; R2, 0.93; p < 0.0001) and ED discharge prescriptions (β, –24.4; 95% CI, –27.9 to –20.9; R2, 0.90; p < 0.001). The efforts of the task force had an immediate effect on opioid prescribing practices; results for effect sustainability were mixed. Conclusion A clinical pharmacist–led opioid reduction program in the ED was demonstrated to have positive results, with a more than 50% reduction in both ED opioid orders and discharge prescriptions.
Summary:Increasing numbers of patients are undergoing diagnostic catheterization as outpatients; however, a small proportion of patients requires hospital admission following the procedure. Unplanned admissions after consecutive outpatient tively reviewed to determine the incidence of and reasons for admission. Among 847 patients undergoing outpatient cardiac catheterization, 130 patients (1 5%) required hospital admission after the procedure. Admitted patients were divided into luminal coronary angioplasty (FICA) (Croup 1; 33%). patients with severe cardiac disease requiring urgent intervention (Group 2; 48%), patients suffering complications or hemodynamic instability (Group 3; 15%), and patients whose procedures were completed too late to allow same-day discharge (Group 4; 4%). Patients over 65 were more likely to require admission and women were more likely to be admitted with complications or hemdynamic instability. Findings are compared with results of other outpatient series, and implications reganling ap propriate setting for outpatient cathetehtion are discussed.cardiac catheterizations performeed during 1 Y~XX W= P~O S~~C -four groups: patients undergoing immediate percutaneoustrans-
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.