The relative effectiveness of Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium, selenite cystine (SC) broth, and tetrathionate (TT) broth for the recovery of Salmonella spp. from foods with a low microbial load was determined. RV medium made from its individual ingredients and incubated at 42 degrees C was compared with a commercial preparation of SC broth, incubated at 35 degrees C, and TT broth incubated at 35 and 43 degrees C, for the recovery of Salmonella spp. Twenty-one artificially contaminated food types that included dairy foods, spices, and egg products, as well as other low-microbial-load foods, were analyzed. The foods were inoculated with single Salmonella serovars at target levels ranging from 0.04 to 0.4 CFU/g. No significant differences (P< or =0.05) among the selective enrichment broths for the recovery of Salmonella spp. from 18 of the foods were observed. Significantly fewer Salmonella-positive test portions of gelatin, guar gum, and nonfat dry milk were recovered with RV medium than with SC broth incubated at 35 degrees C and TT broth incubated at 35 and 43 degrees C. TT broth incubated at 35 degrees C recovered the greatest number of Salmonella-positive test portions. For the recovery of Salmonella spp. from foods with a low microbial load, it is recommended that TT broth incubated at 35 degrees C and RV medium incubated at 42 degrees C be used.
A collaborative study was performed in 18 laboratories to validate use of Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium in the standard culture method for recovery of Salmonella spp. from raw, highly contaminated foods and poultry feed. RV medium made from its individual ingredients and incubated at 42�C was compared with selenite cystine (SC) broth incubated at 35�C and tetrathionate (TT) broth incubated at 35� and 43�C for effectiveness in recovery of Salmonella spp. Four artificially contaminated foods (oysters, frog legs, mushrooms, and shrimp) and poultry feed and one naturally contaminated food (chicken) were analyzed. The artificially contaminated foods were inoculated with single serovars of Salmonella at target levels of 0.04 colony-forming units (CFU)/g for the low level and 0.4 CFU/g for the high level. For analysis of 1125 test portions, RV medium (42�C) recovered Salmonellairom 409 test portions; TT (43�C), from 368 test portions; TT (35�C), from 310 test portions; and SC (35�C), from 334 test portions. Overall, RV medium was comparable with or better than other selective enrichments for recovery of Salmonella from the foods in this study, except mushrooms. From mushrooms, SC broth (35�C) recovered more positive test portions than did RV medium (42�C) and TT broth (43�C). The method for detection of Salmonella in raw, highly contaminated foods and
The relative effectiveness of three methods for the recovery of Salmonella serovars from orange juice was determined. One method, a modified Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM) procedure consisted of preenrichment in lactose broth at 35 degrees C for 24 h, selective enrichment, and selective plating. Another method, a National Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC 1) procedure, consisted of direct enrichment in tetrathionate broth at 35 degrees C for 24 and 48 h, followed by selective plating. The third method (also from CDC and designated CDC 2) consisted of preenrichment in Universal Preenrichment (UP) broth at 35 degrees C for 24 h, selective enrichment, and selective plating. In 10 experiments encompassing five different Salmonella serovars and 200 test portions per broth, the CDC 1 method recovered 141 Salmonella-positive test portions, the BAM method recovered 151, and the CDC 2 method recovered 171. In 2 of the 10 experiments, with two different Salmonella serovars, the BAM recovered significantly fewer (P < 0.05) Salmonella-positive test portions than did the CDC 2 method. On the basis of the above results, the second phase of this study focused on a comparison of the effectiveness of the BAM-recommended lactose broth and the CDC 2-recommended UP broth as preenrichment media for the recovery of Salmonella serovars from pasteurized and unpasteurized orange juice. Subsequent culture treatment of the two preenrichments was identical so that the effect of other variables (e.g., different selective enrichment media, various incubation temperatures, and different selective plating agars) on the relative performance of these two preenrichment media was excluded. In one of nine experiments, with pasteurized orange juice, lactose broth recovered significantly fewer (P < 0.05) Salmonella-positive test portions than did UP broth. For the combined results of the nine pasteurized orange juice experiments (180 test portions per broth), lactose broth recovered 99 Salmonella-positive test portions, and UP broth recovered 116. In three of seven experiments, with unpasteurized orange juice, lactose broth recovered significantly fewer (P < 0.05) Salmonella-positive test portions than did UP broth. For the combined results of the seven unpasteurized orange juice experiments (140 test portions per broth), lactose broth recovered 73 Salmonella-positive test portions, and UP broth recovered 117. For both pasteurized and unpasteurized orange juice, the total number of Salmonella-positive test portions recovered with UP broth was significantly greater than the number recovered with lactose broth. These results indicate that UP broth is a more effective enrichment broth for the recovery of Salmonella from orange juice than is lactose broth.
The effectiveness of selenite cystine (SC) broth, tetrathionate (TT) broth, and Rappaport-Vassiliadis (RV) medium for recovery of Salmonella spp. from 8 highly contaminated foods was determined. RV medium prepared from individual ingredients and incubated at 42° and 43°C was compared with 2 commercial (Difco and Oxoid) media incubated at 42°C. Naturally and artificially contaminated foods were tested under 2 protocols. For Protocol 1, each food was preenriched in the appropriate medium. After incubation, serial 10 fold dilutions of the preenriched foods were inoculated into selective enrichment media and incubated at 35°, 42°, or 43°C. Effectiveness of these conditions was evaluated by most probable number determination of Salmonella spp. recovered. Productivity of selective enrichments did not differ significantly with this protocol, except that with Oxoid RV medium the number of Salmonella cells recovered from most of the foods was significantly reduced. For Protocol 2, twenty 25 g test portions from artificially inoculated foods were examined qualitatively for Salmonella spp. The effectiveness of the broth/temperature combinations was determined by the number of positive tests under each condition. RV medium prepared from individual ingredients and TT broth incubated at 43°C yielded significantly more Salmonella-positive tests from frog legs and lettuce than did SC and TT broths incubated at 35°C or commercial RV medium incubated at 42°C. With pork sausage and ground beef, significantly fewer Salmonella-positive tests were found with Oxoid RV medium incubated at 42°C and SC incubated at 35°C than from other selective enrichments. With chicken, fewer Salmonella-positive tests were found from SC and TT broths incubated at 35°C and Oxoid RV medium incubated at 42°C than from other selective enrichments. There were no significant differences among selective enrichments in the recovery of Salmonella spp. from the remaining foods. Overall, RV prepared from individual ingredients and incubated at 42°C yielded the highest number of Salmonella-posWive tests.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.